Fused Deposition modeling process parameters optimization and effect on mechanical properties and part quality: Review and reflection on present research

被引:191
|
作者
Sheoran, Ankita Jaisingh [1 ]
Kumar, Harish [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Mech Engn, Sect A-7, Delhi 110040, India
关键词
Additive Manufacturing (AM); Mechanical properties; Fused Deposition modeling (FDM); Optimization; Process parameters; Design of Experiments (DOE); FDM PROCESS PARAMETERS; MATRIX COMPOSITES; STRENGTH; IMPROVEMENT; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; SHEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.296
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) was developed initially as a technique for rapid prototyping, to visualize, test and authenticate a design, before end-user production of the design. In recent years, Additive Manufacturing (AM) technique Fused Deposition modeling (FDM), has developed to become a rapid manufacturing technique because of the ability to produce complex parts layer-by-layer in lesser production cycle time than as compared to conventional machining processes. FDM also offers the advantage of the lowest cost because of no tooling requirements. Despite these advantages, building parts by utilizing FDM for end-use is still a demanding endeavor. This is because FDM has multiple processing parameters, which affect the part quality, mechanical properties, build time and dimensional accuracy. These FDM processing parameters include air gap, build orientation, infill percentage, raster angle, layer thickness, etc. Depending upon the application, for which the part is manufactured, careful selection of these process parameters needs to be done. For a specific output requirement, some of the process parameters are significant than the rest, these significant process parameters need to be identified and optimized. Due to this, researchers have explored and utilized various experimental or statistical Design of Experiment (DOE) techniques for optimizing the FDM process parameters to improve the mechanical properties or part quality or both. Some of these DOE techniques include the Taguchi method, Genetic algorithm (GA), gray relational, Response surface method (RSM), fractional factorial, Artificial Neural networks (ANN), Fuzzy logic, ANOVA, etc. This article aims at reviewing the current research on the statistical and experimental design techniques for different applications or output responses such as enhancing mechanical properties, build time, part quality, etc. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Mechanical and Energy Technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1659 / 1672
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental Investigation and Prediction of Mechanical Properties in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process
    Tura, Amanuel Diriba
    Lemu, Hirpa G.
    Mamo, Hana Beyene
    CRYSTALS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [32] Optimizing multiple process parameters in fused deposition modeling with particle swarm optimization
    Arup Dey
    David Hoffman
    Nita Yodo
    International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2020, 14 : 393 - 405
  • [33] Investigations into Complete Liquefier Dynamics and Optimization of Process Parameters for Fused Deposition Modeling
    Pandey, Ashutosh
    Pradhan, Sharad K.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 5 (05) : 12940 - 12955
  • [34] Optimizing multiple process parameters in fused deposition modeling with particle swarm optimization
    Dey, Arup
    Hoffman, David
    Yodo, Nita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2020, 14 (02): : 393 - 405
  • [35] Effect of Process Parameters and Material Selection on the Quality of 3D Printed Products by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): A Review
    Palanisamy, Sivasubramanian
    Karuppiah, Ganesan
    Kumar, Praveen
    Dharmalingam, Shanmugam
    Mubarak, Suhail
    Santulli, Carlo
    Ayrilmis, Nadir
    Karumuri, Srikanth
    ADVANCES IN POLYMER TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 2024
  • [36] Advances in fused deposition modeling on process, process parameters, and multifaceted industrial application: a review
    Enyan, Michael
    Amu-Darko, Jesse Nii Okai
    Issaka, Eliasu
    Abban, Olivier Joseph
    ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPRESS, 2024, 6 (01):
  • [37] Mechanical properties of thermoplastic parts produced by fused deposition modeling: a review
    Bakir, Ali Alperen
    Atik, Resul
    Ozerinc, Sezer
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (03) : 537 - 561
  • [38] Part surface quality improvement studies in fused deposition modelling process: a review
    Taufik, Mohammad
    Jain, Prashant K.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (02) : 527 - 551
  • [39] EFFECT OF PROCESS PARAMETERS ON VOID FORMATION IN FUSED DEPOSITION MODELLING (FDM) PART
    Sudin, Mohd Nizam
    Daud, Nazri Md
    Ramli, Faiz Redza
    Yusuff, Mohd Asri
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02):
  • [40] Influence of slicing parameters on selected mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling prints
    Sandhu, Gurmaheshinder Singh
    Boparai, Kamaljit Singh
    Sandhu, Kawaljit Singh
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 48 : 1378 - 1382