A review of layer of protection analysis techniques for oil and gas industry

被引:4
|
作者
Markowski, Adam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Lodz, Safety Engn Dept, Fac Proc & Environm Engn, PL-90133 Lodz, Poland
关键词
process safety; risk assessment; safety assurance; RISK-ASSESSMENT; LOPA; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1504/IJOGCT.2012.044178
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The paper indicates advantages (and disadvantages) of layer of protection analysis (LOPA) over other methods to support its paramount position among different process safety analysis (PSA) methods in use today. Its simplicity (using order-of-magnitude estimates for all elements that constitute an accident scenario), universality (easy adaptation to particular needs), directness to indicate the effect of risk reduction measures as well as to assess the total level of risk to be compared with the company risk tolerance criteria are strong arguments for wider application of LOPA. However, the method may have some limitations (disadvantages) in comparison to other methods and therefore different extended approaches of LOPA have been developed to overcome the problem. Those approaches include an inclusion of an expert system into accident scenario identification (ExSysLOPA), new approach to deal with uncertainty connected with input data (fuzzy LOPA) as well as for explosion at workplace risk assessment (ExLOPA). Some of these combined techniques will be presented here and they support and extend the applications of layer of protection analysis, especially for safety assurance assessment of risk-based determination that is used in oil and gas process industries. [Received: March 25, 2011; Accepted: June 16, 2011]
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 79
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
    Al-Rbeawi, Salam
    UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [22] Environmental problems of the oil-and-gas industry (Review)
    L. P. Gossen
    L. M. Velichkina
    Petroleum Chemistry, 2006, 46 : 67 - 72
  • [23] Oil and gas pipeline robot localization techniques: A review
    Li, Yujia
    Huang, Xiao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2024, 238 (23) : 11049 - 11067
  • [24] RISK ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OF OIL AND GAS PIPELINE
    Altuwair, Ibrahim A.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES-UNIVERSIDAD DEL QUINDIO, 2022, 34 (01): : 162 - 173
  • [25] A Review of Mercury Waste Management in the ASEAN Oil and Gas Industry
    Le, Huyen Thi
    Punurai, Wonsiri
    Zawawi, Noor Amila Wan
    Yaakob, Omar Bin
    Nguyen, Nhung Thi Phuong
    Le, Thanh Thanh
    Nguyen, Kiet Van
    Amelia, Sari
    Kamarudin, Nurul Anis
    Kang, Hooi-Siang
    Le, Sy Van
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [26] A review of hydrocarbon allocation methods in the upstream oil and gas industry
    Kanshio, Sunday
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 184
  • [27] Advanced developments in nanotechnology and nanomaterials for the oil and gas industry: A review
    Pang, Shaocong
    Zhao, Luo
    An, Yuxiu
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 238
  • [28] Review and Outlook on the Energy Transition in the Global Oil and Gas Industry
    Xu Dong
    Zhan Yiming
    China Oil & Gas, 2025, 32 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [29] CFD Applied to Process Development in the Oil and Gas Industry - A Review
    Raynal, L.
    Augier, F.
    Bazer-Bachi, F.
    Haroun, Y.
    da Fonte, C. Pereira
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2016, 71 (03):
  • [30] Human factors engineering in oil and gas - a review of industry guidance
    Robb, Martin
    Miller, Gerald
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 752 - 762