Behavioral test methods workshop

被引:23
|
作者
Slikker, W
Acuff, K
Boyes, WK
Chelonis, J
Crofton, KM
Dearlove, GE
Li, A
Moser, VC
Newland, C
Rossi, J
Schantz, S
Sette, W
Sheets, L
Stanton, M
Tyl, S
Sobotka, TJ
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Neurotoxicol, US FDA, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH 45202 USA
[3] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
[5] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[7] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[8] US FDA, CFSAN, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
关键词
behavior; dose-response; experimental design; safety assessment; test method selection; training; validation; control of confounds; data variability; data analysis; data interpretation and risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ntt.2005.02.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A one and a half day workshop on behavioral testing was conducted in order to discuss experimental procedures and practices that may help enhance the utility of behavioral data as a reliable index of neurotoxicity and in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. The workshop was open to participation by all sectors of the neuroscience community including academia, government, testing laboratories, and industry. The level of confidence with which changes in behavior can reliably signal adverse effects on the nervous system depends, in part, on the scientific quality of the data generated. With an emphasis on education and problem solving, the workshop focused on the practical aspects and scientific rationale underlying valid and high quality testing. In behavioral testing, there are numerous experimental factors that may impact on the quality of data. These include such elements as experimental design, selection of test methods, the care and precision in the conduct of behavioral testing, procedures to minimize bias and potential confounds, appropriateness of statistical analyses, and data interpretation. In plenary session investigators experienced in behavioral testing discussed the significance of these various experimental factors to data quality, outlined problematic issues, and presented a synopsis of approaches for addressing each of the factors as outlined in a draft of a primer developed by the Interagency Committee on Neurotoxicology (ICON). During the remainder of the workshop, open discussions in small breakout groups were used to address the problematic issues identified by the plenary speakers and explore alternative approaches for dealing with them. Finally, all workshop participants were reconvened in plenary session for summation of breakout group discussions and final recommendations. Information from the workshop was used to form the basis of this manuscript and will be used to help finalize a behavioral test methods primer being drafted by the ICON. The overall conclusions from the workshop were that consensus can be reached on the fundamentals of behavioral assessment, and that aspects of behavioral assessment including experimental design, test method selection, training, validation, control of confounds, data variability, data analysis, and data interpretation need to be carefully considered in the planning and conduct of behavioral safety assessments. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 427
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WORKSHOP ON IMMUNOSUPPRESSION BY BIOLOGIC METHODS
    LEVEY, RH
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1979, 11 (01) : 1179 - 1182
  • [32] ILAY Workshop on Iterative Methods
    Benzi, M
    Douglas, C
    IEEE COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 1996, 3 (03): : 84 - 86
  • [33] Methods of work: Workshop.
    Ziener, C
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2001, 126 (04) : 129 - 129
  • [34] Behavioral test economics
    Davidson, Scott
    Ambler, Anthony
    Davidson, Helen
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 18 - +
  • [35] A test for behavioral equivalence
    Hou, M
    Pugh, AC
    Hayton, GE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2000, 45 (11) : 2177 - 2182
  • [36] SUMMARY OF WORKSHOP - COMPUTERIZED TEST BATTERIES
    IREGREN, A
    LETZ, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 60 (01) : 82 - 83
  • [37] TEST-TAKING SKILLS WORKSHOP
    TOOMER, JE
    JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 1977, 18 (01) : 68 - 69
  • [38] BEHAVIORAL GENETIC METHODS
    PLOMIN, R
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1986, 54 (01) : 226 - 261
  • [39] Goal Orientation Test: An Objective Behavioral Test
    Romero, Miriam
    Manuel Hernandez, Jose
    Juola, James F.
    Casadevante, Cristina
    Santacreu, Jose
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2020, 123 (04) : 1425 - 1451
  • [40] Third international workshop on empirical evaluation of agile methods ("the data workshop")
    Melnik, G
    El Emam, K
    EXTREME PROGRAMMING AND AGILE METHODS - XP/ AGILE UNIVERSE 2004, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3134 : 188 - 189