Behavioral test methods workshop

被引:23
|
作者
Slikker, W
Acuff, K
Boyes, WK
Chelonis, J
Crofton, KM
Dearlove, GE
Li, A
Moser, VC
Newland, C
Rossi, J
Schantz, S
Sette, W
Sheets, L
Stanton, M
Tyl, S
Sobotka, TJ
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Neurotoxicol, US FDA, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] Procter & Gamble Co, Cincinnati, OH 45202 USA
[3] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
[5] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60680 USA
[7] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[8] US FDA, CFSAN, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
关键词
behavior; dose-response; experimental design; safety assessment; test method selection; training; validation; control of confounds; data variability; data analysis; data interpretation and risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ntt.2005.02.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A one and a half day workshop on behavioral testing was conducted in order to discuss experimental procedures and practices that may help enhance the utility of behavioral data as a reliable index of neurotoxicity and in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. The workshop was open to participation by all sectors of the neuroscience community including academia, government, testing laboratories, and industry. The level of confidence with which changes in behavior can reliably signal adverse effects on the nervous system depends, in part, on the scientific quality of the data generated. With an emphasis on education and problem solving, the workshop focused on the practical aspects and scientific rationale underlying valid and high quality testing. In behavioral testing, there are numerous experimental factors that may impact on the quality of data. These include such elements as experimental design, selection of test methods, the care and precision in the conduct of behavioral testing, procedures to minimize bias and potential confounds, appropriateness of statistical analyses, and data interpretation. In plenary session investigators experienced in behavioral testing discussed the significance of these various experimental factors to data quality, outlined problematic issues, and presented a synopsis of approaches for addressing each of the factors as outlined in a draft of a primer developed by the Interagency Committee on Neurotoxicology (ICON). During the remainder of the workshop, open discussions in small breakout groups were used to address the problematic issues identified by the plenary speakers and explore alternative approaches for dealing with them. Finally, all workshop participants were reconvened in plenary session for summation of breakout group discussions and final recommendations. Information from the workshop was used to form the basis of this manuscript and will be used to help finalize a behavioral test methods primer being drafted by the ICON. The overall conclusions from the workshop were that consensus can be reached on the fundamentals of behavioral assessment, and that aspects of behavioral assessment including experimental design, test method selection, training, validation, control of confounds, data variability, data analysis, and data interpretation need to be carefully considered in the planning and conduct of behavioral safety assessments. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 427
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Workshop on Test Methods
    Yu. A. Zolotov
    Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 55 (12) : 1182 - 1183
  • [2] Workshop on Test Methods and Metrics for Accessible HRI
    Marvel, Jeremy
    Bagchi, Shelly
    Zimmerman, Megan
    Aksu, Murat
    Antonishek, Brian
    Case, Jennifer
    Fong, Terry
    Nguyen, Vinh
    Norton, Adam
    Senft, Emmanuel
    Wang, Yue
    COMPANION OF THE ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2023, 2023, : 944 - 946
  • [3] Summary of the workshop on training for the implementation of alternative test methods
    Halder, M
    Sailstad, D
    ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2004, 32 : 699 - 701
  • [4] WORKSHOP ON UPDATING EYE IRRITATION TEST METHODS - PROPOSALS FOR REGULATORY CONSENSUS
    HILL, RN
    CHAMBERS, WA
    GREEN, S
    GUPTA, KC
    HURLEY, PM
    LAMBERT, LA
    LEE, CC
    LEE, JK
    LIU, PT
    LOWTHER, DK
    ROBERTS, CD
    SEABAUGH, VM
    SPRINGER, JA
    WILCOX, NL
    FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1993, 31 (02) : 79 - 79
  • [5] COMPARISON OF TRACKING METHODS IN RESPECT OF AUTOMATION OF AN ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL TEST
    Mazur-Milecka, Magdalena
    Nowakowski, Antoni
    METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS, 2011, 18 (01) : 91 - 104
  • [6] BEHAVIORAL AND NEUROGENETICS WORKSHOP SUMMARY
    SOKOLOWSKI, MB
    GENOME, 1989, 31 (01) : 462 - 463
  • [7] 4th Annual Workshop on Test Methods and Metrics for Effective HRI
    Marvel, Jeremy
    Bagchi, Shelly
    Zimmerman, Megan
    Nguyen, Vinh
    Aksu, Murat
    Antonishek, Brian
    Case, Jennifer
    Ben Amor, Heni
    Fong, Terry
    Mead, Ross
    Norton, Adam
    Wang, Yue
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '22), 2022, : 1272 - 1274
  • [8] Soft Matter Mechanics: Behavioral Characteristics, Theoretical Models and Test Methods
    Xue X.
    Zeng C.
    Wang S.
    He W.
    Cailiao Daobao/Materials Review, 2018, 32 (08): : 2693 - 2700
  • [9] European Test Workshop
    Zorian, Y
    IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, 1996, 13 (03): : 8 - 8
  • [10] Methods of behavioral testing in dogs: a scoping review and analysis of test stimuli
    Moser, Ariella Y.
    Welch, Mitchell
    Brown, Wendy Y.
    McGreevy, Paul
    Bennett, Pauleen C.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11