Healthcare Misinformation Detection and Fact-Checking: A Novel Approach

被引:0
|
作者
Barve, Yashoda [1 ]
Saini, Jatinderkumar R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Suryadatta Coll Management Informat Res & Technol, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[2] Symbiosis Int Deemed Univ, Symbiosis Inst Comp Studies & Res, Pune, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Misinformation detection; sentiment analysis; document similarity; fact-check; healthcare; FAKE NEWS;
D O I
10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0121032
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Information gets spread rapidly in the world of the internet. The internet has become the first choice of people for medication tips related to their health problems. However, this ever-growing usage of the internet has also led to the spread of misinformation. The misinformation in healthcare has severe effects on the life of people, thus efforts are required to detect the misinformation as well as fact-check the information before using it. In this paper, the authors proposed a model to detect and fact-check the misinformation in the healthcare domain. The model extracts the healthcare-related URLs from the web, pre-processes it, computes Term-Frequency, extracts sentimental and grammatical features to detect misinformation, and computes distance measures viz. Euclidean, Jaccard, and Cosine similarity to fact-check the URLs as True or False based on the manually generated dataset with expert's opinions. The model was evaluated using five state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and Random forest. The experimental results showed that the sentimental features are crucial while detecting misinformation as more negative words are found in URLs containing misinformation compared to the URLs having true information. It was observed that Wye Bayes outperformed all other models in terms of accuracy showing 98.7% accuracy whereas the decision tree classifier showed less accuracy compared to all other models showing an accuracy of 92.88% Also, the Jaccard Distance measure was found to be the best distance measure algorithm in terms of accuracy compared to Euclidean distance and Cosine similarity measures.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 303
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fact-Checking, a Public Service Value in the Face of the Hoaxes of the Healthcare Crisis
    Jose Ufarte-Ruiz, Maria
    Galletero-Campos, Belen
    Maria Lopez-Cepeda, Ana
    TRIPODOS, 2020, (47): : 87 - 103
  • [42] The Chicago Guide to Fact-Checking
    Dar, Mahnaz
    Knapp, Maggie
    Lothrop, Patricia
    Medina, Gary
    Parrott, Kiera
    Pugl, Dave
    Selwyn, Laurie
    Sendaula, Stephanie
    Tench, Robert
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2017, 142 (04) : 32 - 32
  • [43] FACT-CHECKING FISA APPLICATIONS
    Groden, Claire
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2021, 96 (05) : 1634 - 1674
  • [44] Increasing Demand for Fact-Checking
    Graham, Matthew H.
    Porter, Ethan V.
    POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2025, 42 (02) : 325 - 348
  • [45] Fact-Checking Lawrence of Arabia
    Powell, Eric A.
    ARCHAEOLOGY, 2016, 69 (04) : 12 - 12
  • [47] Unpacking Multimodal Fact-Checking: Features and Engagement of Fact-Checking Videos on Chinese TikTok (Douyin)
    Lu, Yingdan
    Shen, Cuihua
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [48] Fact-checking algorithms for the Internet
    Martynov, A. S.
    Voronina, I. E.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND MECHANICS: CURRENT PROBLEMS, 2020, 1479
  • [49] Automated fact-checking: A survey
    Zeng, Xia
    Abumansour, Amani S.
    Zubiaga, Arkaitz
    LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS, 2021, 15 (10):
  • [50] The limits of live fact-checking: Epistemological consequences of introducing a breaking news logic to political fact-checking
    Steensen, Steen
    Kalsnes, Bente
    Westlund, Oscar
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024, 26 (11) : 6347 - 6365