Patients' regrets after participating in a randomized controlled trial depended on their involvement in the decision making

被引:20
|
作者
Mancini, Julien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Genre, Dominique [4 ,5 ]
Dalenc, Florence [6 ]
Ferrero, Jean-Marc [7 ]
Kerbrat, Pierre [8 ]
Martin, Anne-Laure [9 ]
Roche, Henri [6 ]
Maylevin, Francoise [10 ]
Tarpin, Carole [4 ]
Viens, Patrice [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Gamet, Corinne [9 ]
Julian-Reynier, Claire [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Sch Med, F-13385 Marseille, France
[2] INSERM, SE4S, IRD, UMR912, F-13273 Marseille, France
[3] Timone Hosp, APHM, Publ Hlth Dept SSPIM, F-13273 Marseille, France
[4] Inst J Paoli I Calmettes, F-13273 Marseille, France
[5] Ctr Rech Cancerol Marseille, UMR891, INSERM, F-13273 Marseille, France
[6] Claudius Regaud Inst, Dept Med Oncol, F-31052 Toulouse, France
[7] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, Dept Med Oncol, F-06189 Nice, France
[8] Eugene Marquis Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, F-35042 Rennes, France
[9] FNCLCC, F-75654 Paris, France
[10] Ligue Natl Contre Canc, Comites Patients FNCLCC, Paris, France
关键词
Breast cancer; Randomized controlled trials; Regret; Decision-making; Patient participation; Informed consent; CANCER CLINICAL-TRIALS; INFORMED-CONSENT; BREAST-CANCER; INFORMATION; SCALE; QUALITY; CARE; SATISFACTION; ASSOCIATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To identify the factors associated with long-term regrets expressed a posteriori by randomized controlled trial (RCT) participants questioned about their decision to participate in an RCT. Study Design and Setting: Participants were questioned 6 years on average after their inclusion in a breast cancer adjuvant therapy RCT. Among 115 women from 21 centers, 93 (81%) answered a self-administered questionnaire based on the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Results: Mean DRS score was 16.8 (standard deviation = 15.9): 43.0% of participants expressed mild regret, and 25.8% expressed moderate to strong regret. A quarter of the women (25.6%) said that the decision was taken by the doctor alone, and 13.5% said it was not consistent with their own wishes. In the multivariate ordinal regression analysis, an involuntarily passive role in decision making was found to be associated with greater regret (cumulative proportional odds ratio = 7.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.0-27.6), regardless of age, and being allotted or not to the standard treatment in the RCT. Conclusion: Whether patients' regret depended on their level of participation in the decision making or vice versa could not be determined in this cross-sectional survey, but efforts should be made to ensure that patients' participation in trials is always based on an active personal decision. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 642
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial
    Laure Perrier
    Nav Persaud
    Kevin E. Thorpe
    Sharon E. Straus
    Implementation Science, 10
  • [42] Shared Decision Making in Neurosurgery Clinic Visits: General Descriptions and a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Hubner, Lauren M.
    Gardner, Rebecca M.
    Huffman, Lynne C.
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 42 (02): : S6 - S6
  • [43] The evolution of the randomized controlled trial and its role in evidence-based decision making
    Devereaux, PJ
    Yusuf, S
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 254 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [44] Structured shared decision-making using dialogue and visualization: A randomized controlled trial
    Westermann, George M. A.
    Verheij, Fop
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Verhulst, Frank C.
    Van Oort, Floor V. A.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 90 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [45] Using a systematic review in clinical decision making: a pilot parallel, randomized controlled trial
    Perrier, Laure
    Persaud, Nav
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [46] Improving Decision-Making for Feeding Options in Advanced Dementia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Hanson, Laura C.
    Carey, Timothy S.
    Caprio, Anthony J.
    Lee, Tae Joon
    Ersek, Mary
    Garrett, Joanne
    Jackman, Anne
    Gilliam, Robin
    Wessell, Kathryn
    Mitchell, Susan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (11) : 2009 - 2016
  • [47] Results from a randomized controlled trial of team decision-making in child welfare
    Rushovich, Berenice
    Hebert, Allison
    Crampton, David
    Malm, Karin
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2021, 131
  • [48] Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
    Rivero-Santana, A.
    Torrente-Jimenez, R. S.
    Perestelo-Perez, L.
    Torres-Castano, A.
    Ramos-Garcia, V.
    Bilbao, A.
    Escobar, A.
    Serrano-Aguilar, P.
    Feijoo-Cid, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2021, 29 (09) : 1265 - 1274
  • [49] Getting patients back for routine colorectal cancer screening: Randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making intervention
    Sepucha, Karen R.
    Valentine, Kathrene D.
    Atlas, Steven J.
    Chang, Yuchiao
    Fairfield, Kathleen M.
    Ha, Jasmine
    Leavitt, Lauren
    Lee, Vivian
    Percac-Lima, Sanja
    Richter, James M.
    Simmons, Leigh
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03): : 3555 - 3566
  • [50] Impact of the VTE-PREDICT calculator on clinicians' decision making in fictional patients with venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled trial
    Duijzer, Daniel
    de Winter, Maria A.
    Carrier, Marc
    Cohen, Alexander T.
    Hansen, John-Bjarne
    Kaasjager, Karin A. H.
    Kakkar, Ajay K.
    Middeldorp, Saskia
    Sorensen, Henrik T.
    Visseren, Frank L. J.
    Wells, Philip S.
    Dorresteijn, Jannick A. N.
    Nijkeuter, Mathilde
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 8 (07)