Addition of Synthetic Biomaterials to Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) for Bone Augmentation-A Preclinical In Vivo Study

被引:1
|
作者
Fujioka-Kobayashi, Masako [1 ,2 ]
Katagiri, Hiroki [1 ,3 ]
Lang, Niklaus P. [1 ]
Imber, Jean-Claude [4 ]
Schaller, Benoit [1 ]
Saulacic, Nikola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp, Dept Craniomaxillofacial Surg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Nippon Dent Univ Tokyo, Sch Life Dent Tokyo, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1028159, Japan
[3] Nippon Dent Univ, Sch Life Dent Niigata, Adv Res Ctr, Chuo Ku, 1-8 Hamauracho, Niigata 9518580, Japan
[4] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
in vivo; biomaterials; tricalcium phosphate; biphasic calcium phosphate; bone augmentation; BIPHASIC CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; EARLY IMPLANT PLACEMENT; LONG-TERM STABILITY; AUTOGENOUS BONE; HYDROXYAPATITE; REGENERATION; SUBSTITUTES; SINGLE;
D O I
10.3390/ijms231810516
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
(1) Aim: To investigate the effect of synthetic bone substitutes, alpha-tricalcium phosphate (alpha-TCP) or bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate (BBCP) combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), on bone formation. (2) Methods: Thirty critical size defects were randomly treated with the following five different treatment modalities: (1) negative control (NC, empty), (2) DBBM, (3) alpha-TCP + DBBM (1:1), (4) BBCP 3%HA/97%alpha-TCP + DBBM (1:1), and (5) BBCP 6%HA/94%alpha-TCP + DBBM (1:1). The samples, at four weeks post-surgery, were investigated by micro-CT and histological analysis. (3) Results: A similar level of new bone formation was demonstrated in the DBBM with alpha-TCP bone substitute groups when compared to the negative control by histomorphometry. DBBM alone showed significantly lower new bone area than the negative control (p = 0.0252). In contrast to DBBM, the micro-CT analysis revealed resorption of the alpha-TCP + DBBM, BBCP 3%HA/97%alpha-TCP + DBBM and BBCP 6%HA/94%alpha-TCP + DBBM, as evidenced by a decrease of material density (p = 0.0083, p = 0.0050 and p = 0.0191, respectively), without changing their volume. (4) Conclusions: New bone formation was evident in all defects augmented with biomaterials, proving the osteoconductive properties of the tested material combinations. There was little impact of the HA coating degree on alpha-TCP in bone augmentation potential and material resorption for four weeks when mixed with DBBM.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE SINUS BONE GRAFT USING DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE MINERAL WITH LATERAL APPROACH
    Hong, Soon-Min
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2006, 32 (05) : 482 - 487
  • [32] The clinical use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in conjunction with immediate implant installation
    van Steenberghe, D
    Callens, A
    Geers, L
    Jacobs, R
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 (03) : 210 - 216
  • [33] Deproteinized bovine bone mineral is non-inferior to deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in maintaining the soft tissue contour post-extraction: A randomized trial
    Sapata, Vitor M.
    Llanos, Alexandre H.
    Cesar Neto, Joao B.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Pannuti, Claudio M.
    Romito, Giuseppe A.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) : 294 - 301
  • [34] Radiographic and histological evaluation of deproteinized bovine bone mineral vs. deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen in ridge preservation. A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Nart, Jose
    Barallat, Lucia
    Jimenez, Daniel
    Mestres, Jaume
    Gomez, Alberto
    Angel Carrasco, Miguel
    Violant, Deborah
    Ruiz-Magaz, Vanessa
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (07) : 840 - 848
  • [35] Efficacy of bovine bone mineral for alveolar augmentation: a human histologic study
    Norton, MR
    Odell, EW
    Thompson, ID
    Cook, RF
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (06) : 775 - 783
  • [36] Bone Regeneration of Macropore Octacalcium Phosphate-Coated Deproteinized Bovine Bone Materials in Sinus Augmentation: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Lee, Jee-Ho
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    Jeon, Ju-Hong
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [37] Guided bone regeneration of non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Sanz, Mariano
    Ferrantino, Luca
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    de Sanctis, Massimo
    Berglundh, Tord
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1466 - 1476
  • [38] Maxillary sinus floor elevation and grafting with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a clinical and histomorphometric study
    Lee, Derrick Z.
    Chen, Stephen T.
    Darby, Ivan B.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (08) : 918 - 924
  • [39] Comparative evaluation of autologous dental bone powder and deproteinized bovine bone mineral allografts for oral implant bone deficits
    Zhang, Hongpeng
    Liu, Shuo
    Hao, Rui
    Yao, Jing
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (12)
  • [40] Deproteinized Bovine Bone Versus β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Sinus Augmentation Surgery: A Comparative Histologic and Histomorphometric Study
    Simunek, Antonin
    Kopecka, Dana
    Somanathan, Rakesh V.
    Pilathadka, Shriharsha
    Brazda, Tomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2008, 23 (05) : 935 - 942