Using the ecosys mathematical model to simulate temporal variability of nitrous oxide emissions from a fertilized agricultural soil

被引:39
|
作者
Metivier, K. A. [1 ]
Pattey, E. [2 ]
Grant, R. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2009年 / 41卷 / 12期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosys; N2O modelling; N2O emissions; Flux-gradient micrometeorological technique; N fertilizer; Temporal variability; Canola; Tunable diode laser; FILLED PORE-SPACE; N2O EMISSIONS; GAS FLUXES; TRACE GAS; DENITRIFICATION; CARBON; TRANSFORMATIONS; MANAGEMENT; NITRATE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.007
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Large temporal variability of N2O emissions complicates calculation of emission factors (EFs) needed for N2O inventories. To contribute towards improving these inventories, a process-based, 3-dimensional mathematical model, ecosys, was used to model N2O emissions from a canola crop. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis in ecosys that large temporal variability of N2O is due to transition among alternative reduction reactions in nitrification/denitrification caused by small changes in soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) following a threshold response, which controls diffusivity (D-g) and solubility of O-2. We simulated emissions at field scale, using a 20 x 20 matrix of 36 m x 36 m grid cells rendered in ArcGIS from a digital elevation model of the fertilized agricultural field. Modelled results were compared to measured N2O fluxes using the flux-gradient technique from a micrometeorological tower equipped with a tunable diode laser, to assess temporal N2O variability. Grid cell simulations were performed using original, earlier and later planting and fertilizer dates, to show the influence of changing precipitation and temperature on EFs. Fertilizer application (112 kg N ha(-1)), precipitation and temperature were the main factors responsible for N2O emissions. Ecosys represented the temporal variation of N2O emissions measured at the tower by modelling significant emissions at WFPS > 60% which reduced the oxygen diffusivity, causing a rising need for alternative electron acceptors, thus greater N2O production via nitrification/denitrification. Small changes in WFPS above a threshold value caused comparatively large changes in N2O flux not directly predictable from soil temperature and WFPS. In ecosys, little N2O production occurred at WFPS < 60% because the oxygen diffusivity was large enough to meet microbial demand. Coefficients of diurnal temporal variation in N2O fluxes were high, ranging from 25-51% (modelled) and 24-63% (measured), during emission periods (0-0.8 mg N2O-N m(2) h(-1)). This variation was shown to rise strongly with temperature during nitrification of N fertilizer so that El's were affected by timing of fertilizer application. EFs almost quadrupled when fertilizer applications were delayed (average: 1.67% (fertilizer-induced emissions), causing nitrification to occur in warmer soils (18 degrees C), compared to earlier applications (average: 0.45%) when nitrification occurred in cooler soils (12 degrees C). Large temporal variation caused biases in seasonal emissions if calculated from infrequent (daily and weekly) measurements. These results show the importance of the use of models that include climate impact on N2O, with appropriate time-steps that capture its temporal variation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2370 / 2386
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strategies for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from weathered soils fertilized with urea
    do Nascimento, Alexandre Ferreira
    Ferreira, Anderson
    Clemente, Rafael Alanis
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2025, 130 (01) : 129 - 143
  • [42] Soil nitrous oxide emissions in forage systems fertilized with liquid dairy manure and inorganic fertilizers
    Lazcano, Cristina
    Tsang, Alia
    Doane, Timothy A.
    Pettygrove, G. Stuart
    Horwath, William R.
    Burger, Martin
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 225 : 160 - 172
  • [43] Soil nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in Canada: Exploring relationships with soil, crop and climatic variables
    Rochette, Philippe
    Liang, Chang
    Pelster, David
    Bergeron, Onil
    Lemke, Reynald
    Kroebel, Roland
    MacDonald, Douglas
    Yan, Weikai
    Flemming, Corey
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 254 : 69 - 81
  • [44] Estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from soil in the UK
    Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0QB, United Kingdom
    不详
    不详
    Energy Convers. Manage., 6-7 (1303-1308):
  • [45] Estimates of nitrous oxide emissions from soil in the UK
    Skiba, U
    McTaggart, IP
    Smith, KA
    Hargreaves, KJ
    Fowler, D
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 37 (6-8) : 1303 - 1308
  • [46] Nitrous oxide emissions from streams in a Swedish agricultural catchment
    Audet, Joachim
    Wallin, Marcus B.
    Kyllmar, Katarina
    Andersson, Stefan
    Bishop, Kevin
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 236 : 295 - 303
  • [47] NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURAL SOILS IN WISCONSIN
    GOODROAD, LL
    KEENEY, DR
    PETERSON, LA
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1984, 13 (04) : 557 - 561
  • [48] Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural toposequences in Alberta and Saskatchewan
    Izaurralde, RC
    Lemke, RL
    Goddard, TW
    McConkey, B
    Zhang, Z
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (04) : 1285 - 1294
  • [49] Spatial and temporal variability of nitrous oxide emissions in a mixed farming landscape of Denmark
    Schelde, K.
    Cellier, P.
    Bertolini, T.
    Dalgaard, T.
    Weidinger, T.
    Theobald, M. R.
    Olesen, J. E.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2012, 9 (08) : 2989 - 3002
  • [50] Nitrous Oxide Emission by Agricultural Soils: A Review of Spatial and Temporal Variability for Mitigation
    C HNAULT
    A GROSSEL
    B MARY
    M ROUSSEL
    J LONARD
    Pedosphere, 2012, 22 (04) : 426 - 433