Using the ecosys mathematical model to simulate temporal variability of nitrous oxide emissions from a fertilized agricultural soil

被引:39
|
作者
Metivier, K. A. [1 ]
Pattey, E. [2 ]
Grant, R. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Renewable Resources, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Res Ctr, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada
来源
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY | 2009年 / 41卷 / 12期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosys; N2O modelling; N2O emissions; Flux-gradient micrometeorological technique; N fertilizer; Temporal variability; Canola; Tunable diode laser; FILLED PORE-SPACE; N2O EMISSIONS; GAS FLUXES; TRACE GAS; DENITRIFICATION; CARBON; TRANSFORMATIONS; MANAGEMENT; NITRATE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.007
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Large temporal variability of N2O emissions complicates calculation of emission factors (EFs) needed for N2O inventories. To contribute towards improving these inventories, a process-based, 3-dimensional mathematical model, ecosys, was used to model N2O emissions from a canola crop. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis in ecosys that large temporal variability of N2O is due to transition among alternative reduction reactions in nitrification/denitrification caused by small changes in soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) following a threshold response, which controls diffusivity (D-g) and solubility of O-2. We simulated emissions at field scale, using a 20 x 20 matrix of 36 m x 36 m grid cells rendered in ArcGIS from a digital elevation model of the fertilized agricultural field. Modelled results were compared to measured N2O fluxes using the flux-gradient technique from a micrometeorological tower equipped with a tunable diode laser, to assess temporal N2O variability. Grid cell simulations were performed using original, earlier and later planting and fertilizer dates, to show the influence of changing precipitation and temperature on EFs. Fertilizer application (112 kg N ha(-1)), precipitation and temperature were the main factors responsible for N2O emissions. Ecosys represented the temporal variation of N2O emissions measured at the tower by modelling significant emissions at WFPS > 60% which reduced the oxygen diffusivity, causing a rising need for alternative electron acceptors, thus greater N2O production via nitrification/denitrification. Small changes in WFPS above a threshold value caused comparatively large changes in N2O flux not directly predictable from soil temperature and WFPS. In ecosys, little N2O production occurred at WFPS < 60% because the oxygen diffusivity was large enough to meet microbial demand. Coefficients of diurnal temporal variation in N2O fluxes were high, ranging from 25-51% (modelled) and 24-63% (measured), during emission periods (0-0.8 mg N2O-N m(2) h(-1)). This variation was shown to rise strongly with temperature during nitrification of N fertilizer so that El's were affected by timing of fertilizer application. EFs almost quadrupled when fertilizer applications were delayed (average: 1.67% (fertilizer-induced emissions), causing nitrification to occur in warmer soils (18 degrees C), compared to earlier applications (average: 0.45%) when nitrification occurred in cooler soils (12 degrees C). Large temporal variation caused biases in seasonal emissions if calculated from infrequent (daily and weekly) measurements. These results show the importance of the use of models that include climate impact on N2O, with appropriate time-steps that capture its temporal variation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2370 / 2386
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized and unfertilized grasslands on peat soil
    van Beek, C. L.
    Pleijter, M.
    Kuikman, P. J.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 89 (03) : 453 - 461
  • [2] Nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized and unfertilized grasslands on peat soil
    C. L. van Beek
    M. Pleijter
    P. J. Kuikman
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2011, 89 : 453 - 461
  • [3] Temperature sensitivity of N2O emissions from fertilized agricultural soils: Mathematical modeling in ecosys
    Grant, R. F.
    Pattey, E.
    GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2008, 22 (04)
  • [4] Temporal Variability of Nitrous Oxide from Fertilized Croplands: Hot Moment Analysis
    Molodovskaya, Marina
    Singurindy, Olga
    Richards, Brian K.
    Warland, Jon
    Johnson, Mark S.
    Steenhuis, Tammo S.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2012, 76 (05) : 1728 - 1740
  • [5] Modeling nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soil incubation experiments using CoupModel
    Zhang, Jie
    Zhang, Wenxin
    Jansson, Per-Erik
    Petersen, Soren O.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 19 (19) : 4811 - 4832
  • [6] Temporal and spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture in Argentina
    Castesana, Paula S.
    Vazquez-Amabile, Gabriel
    Dawidowski, Laura H.
    Gomez, Dario R.
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (03) : 251 - 263
  • [7] Nitrous oxide emission from an agricultural soil fertilized with liquid swine waste or constituents
    Whalen, SC
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (02) : 781 - 789
  • [8] The influence of winter soil cover on spring nitrous oxide emissions from an agricultural soil
    Dietzel, Ranae
    Wolfe, David
    Thies, Janice E.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 43 (09): : 1989 - 1991
  • [9] Emissions of nitrous oxide from soil
    Pathak, H
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (03): : 359 - 369
  • [10] Spatial variability of nitrous oxide emissions and their soil-related determining factors in an agricultural field
    Yanai, J
    Sawamoto, T
    Oe, T
    Kusa, K
    Yamakawa, K
    Sakamoto, K
    Naganawa, T
    Inubushi, K
    Hatano, R
    Kosaki, T
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2003, 32 (06) : 1965 - 1977