Model Inter-Comparison for PM2.5 Components over urban Areas in Japan in the J-STREAM Framework

被引:13
|
作者
Yamaji, Kazuyo [1 ]
Chatani, Satoru [2 ]
Itahashi, Syuichi [3 ]
Saito, Masahiko [4 ]
Takigawa, Masayuki [5 ]
Morikawa, Tazuko [6 ]
Kanda, Isao [7 ]
Miya, Yukako [8 ]
Komatsu, Hiroaki [9 ]
Sakurai, Tatsuya [10 ]
Morino, Yu [2 ]
Kitayama, Kyo [2 ]
Nagashima, Tatsuya [2 ]
Shimadera, Hikari [11 ]
Uranishi, Katsushige [11 ]
Fujiwara, Yuzuru [12 ]
Hashimoto, Tomoaki [12 ]
Sudo, Kengo [13 ]
Misaki, Takeshi [1 ,14 ]
Hayami, Hiroshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Maritime Sci, Kobe, Hyogo 6580022, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[3] Cent Res Inst Elect Power Ind, Abiko, Chiba 2701194, Japan
[4] Ehime Univ, Matsuyama, Ehime 7908566, Japan
[5] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360001, Japan
[6] Japan Automobile Res Inst, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050822, Japan
[7] Japan Meteorol Corp, Osaka 5560021, Japan
[8] Japan Weather Assoc, Toshima Ku, Tokyo 1706055, Japan
[9] Kanagawa Environm Res Ctr, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 2540014, Japan
[10] Meisei Univ, Sch Sci & Engn, Hino, Tokyo 1918506, Japan
[11] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[12] Suuri Keikaku, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1010003, Japan
[13] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
[14] Tokyo Elect Power Serv Co Ltd, Koto Ku, Tokyo 1350062, Japan
关键词
PM2; 5; 5components; three-dimensional chemical transport model; model inter-comparison; urban scale; secondary particles; THERMODYNAMIC-EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL; AIR-QUALITY; MICS-ASIA; EMISSIONS; TRANSPORT; PARAMETERIZATION; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE; ISORROPIA;
D O I
10.3390/atmos11030222
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A model inter-comparison of secondary pollutant simulations over urban areas in Japan, the first phase of Japan's study for reference air quality modeling (J-STREAM Phase I), was conducted using 32 model settings. Simulated hourly concentrations of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which are primary pollutant precursors of particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 mu m or less (PM2.5), showed good agreement with the observed concentrations, but most of the simulated hourly sulfur oxide (SO2) concentrations were much higher than the observations. Simulated concentrations of PM2.5 and its components were compared to daily observed concentrations by using the filter pack method at selected ambient air pollution monitoring stations (AAPMSs) for each season. In general, most models showed good agreement with the observed total PM2.5 mass concentration levels in each season and provided goal or criteria levels of model ensemble statistics in warmer seasons. The good performances of these models were associated with the simulated reproducibility of some dominant components, sulfates (SO42-) and ammonium (NH4+). The other simulated PM2.5 components, i.e., nitrates (NO3-), elemental carbon (EC), and organic carbon (OC), often show clear deviations from the observations. The considerable underestimations (approximately 30 mu g/m(3) for total PM2.5) of all participant models found on heavily polluted days with approximately 40-50 mu g/m(3) for total PM2.5 indicated some problems in the simulated local meteorology such as the atmospheric stability. This model inter-comparison suggests that these deviations may be owing to a need for further improvements both in the emission inventories and additional formation pathways in chemical transport models, and meteorological conditions also require improvement to simulate elevated atmospheric pollutants. Additional accumulated observations are likely needed to further evaluate the simulated concentrations and improve the model performance.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] MSAFormer: A Transformer-Based Model for PM2.5 Prediction Leveraging Sparse Autoencoding of Multi-Site Meteorological Features in Urban Areas
    Wang, Hongqing
    Zhang, Lifu
    Wu, Rong
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (08)
  • [32] ATR-FTIR Spectral Analysis and Soluble Components of PM10 And PM2.5 Particulate Matter over the Urban Area of Palermo (Italy) during Normal Days and Saharan Events
    Varrica, Daniela
    Tamburo, Elisa
    Vultaggio, Marcello
    Di Carlo, Ida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (14)
  • [33] Identifying key factors influencing model performance on ground-level ozone over urban areas in Japan through model inter-comparisons
    Chatani, Satoru
    Yamaji, Kazuyo
    Itahashi, Syuichi
    Saito, Masahiko
    Takigawa, Masayuki
    Morikawa, Tazuko
    Kanda, Isao
    Miya, Yukako
    Komatsu, Hiroaki
    Sakurai, Tatsuya
    Morino, Yu
    Nagashima, Tatsuya
    Kitayama, Kyo
    Shimadera, Hikari
    Uranishi, Katsushige
    Fujiwara, Yuzuru
    Shintani, Soma
    Hayami, Hiroshi
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 223
  • [34] Comparison of Transit User's Inhalation Rates of PM2.5 between Three Transportation Types (Walk, Bus, Subway) in Spring and Summer in Urban Areas of Busan, Korea
    Park, Yongmi
    Kim, Laeun
    Choi, Wonsik
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 35 (05) : 577 - 592
  • [35] A National-Scale 1-km Resolution PM2.5 Estimation Model over Japan Using MAIAC AOD and a Two-Stage Random Forest Model
    Jung, Chau-Ren
    Chen, Wei-Ting
    Nakayama, Shoji F.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [36] Inter-comparison of online and offline methods for measuring ambient heavy and trace elements and water-soluble inorganic ions (NO3-, SO42-, NH4+, and Cl-) in PM2.5 over a heavily polluted megacity, Delhi
    Bhowmik, Himadri Sekhar
    Shukla, Ashutosh
    Lalchandani, Vipul
    Dave, Jay
    Rastogi, Neeraj
    Kumar, Mayank
    Singh, Vikram
    Tripathi, Sachchida Nand
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2022, 15 (09) : 2667 - 2684
  • [37] Saharan dust contribution to PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 in urban and suburban areas of Rome: a comparison between single-particle SEM-EDS analysis and whole-sample PIXE analysis
    Matassoni, Luca
    Pratesi, Giovanni
    Centioli, Damiano
    Cadoni, Fabio
    Lucarelli, Franco
    Nava, Silvia
    Malesani, Piergiorgio
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2011, 13 (03): : 732 - 742