Optimal sensor placement for artificial swimmers

被引:25
|
作者
Verma, Siddhartha [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Papadimitriou, Costas [2 ]
Luethen, Nora [1 ]
Arampatzis, Georgios [1 ]
Koumoutsakos, Petros [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Computat Sci & Engn Lab, Clausiusstr 33, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Thessaly, Dept Mech Engn, GR-38334 Volos, Greece
[3] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Ocean & Mech Engn, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[4] Florida Atlantic Univ, Oceanog Inst, Harbor Branch, Ft Pierce, FL 34946 USA
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
swimming; flying; LATERAL-LINE SYSTEM; PREDICTION ERROR CORRELATION; MOTTLED SCULPIN; FISH; FLOW; PRESSURE; ACCELERATION; SIMULATIONS; SENSITIVITY; KINEMATICS;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2019.940
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Natural swimmers rely for their survival on sensors that gather information from the environment and guide their actions. The spatial organization of these sensors, such as the visual fish system and lateral line, suggests evolutionary selection, but their optimality remains an open question. Here, we identify sensor configurations that enable swimmers to maximize the information gathered from their surrounding flow field. We examine two-dimensional, self-propelled and stationary swimmers that are exposed to disturbances generated by oscillating, rotating and D-shaped cylinders. We combine simulations of the Navier-Stokes equations with Bayesian experimental design to determine the optimal arrangements of shear and pressure sensors that best identify the locations of the disturbance-generating sources. We find a marked tendency for shear stress sensors to be located in the head and the tail of the swimmer, while they are absent from the midsection. In turn, we find a high density of pressure sensors in the head along with a uniform distribution along the entire body. The resulting optimal sensor arrangements resemble neuromast distributions observed in fish and provide evidence for optimality in sensor distribution for natural swimmers.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal sensor placement for structural parameter identification
    Corrado Chisari
    Lorenzo Macorini
    Claudio Amadio
    Bassam A. Izzuddin
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55 : 647 - 662
  • [22] Optimal sensor placement for structural response estimation
    Wei Chen
    Wen-guang Zhao
    Hong-ping Zhu
    Jun-feng Chen
    Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 : 3993 - 4001
  • [23] Optimal sensor placement via Gaussian quadrature
    Miller, RE
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 1998, 97 (01) : 71 - 97
  • [24] Optimal sensor selection and placement for perimeter defense
    Mattikalli, Raju
    Fresnedo, Roman
    Frank, Paul
    Locke, Summer
    Thunemann, Zack
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 1086 - 1093
  • [25] A review on optimal sensor placement for health monitoring
    Liao CanXing
    Li Xingshan
    Zhang Ping
    Dai Jing
    ICEMI 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, VOL IV, 2007, : 170 - 173
  • [26] SENSOR PLACEMENT IN OPTIMAL FILTERING AND SMOOTHING PROBLEMS
    ARBEL, A
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1982, 27 (01) : 94 - 98
  • [27] Optimal Sensor Placement for Fault Information System
    Rostek, Kornel
    ADVANCED MECHATRONICS SOLUTIONS, 2016, 393 : 67 - 72
  • [28] Optimal Sensor Placement for Monitoring of Spatial Networks
    Krishnamurthy, Prashanth
    Khorrami, Farshad
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [29] Optimal sensor placement via Gaussian quadrature
    Miller, Robert E.
    Applied Mathematics and Computation (New York), 1998, 97 (01): : 71 - 97
  • [30] Optimal sensor placement for parameter estimation of bridges
    Eskew, Edward
    Jang, Shinae
    HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2017, 2017, 10170