共 38 条
- [21] Comparison of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction having subsequent percutaneous coronary interventionAMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (05): : 477 - 482Fox, KAAAntman, EMCohen, MBigonzi, F
- [22] The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients ineligible for reperfusion (TETAMI) - A randomized trialJOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (08) : 1348 - 1356Cohen, MGensini, GFMaritz, FGurfinkel, EPHuber, KTimerman, AKrzeminska-Pakula, MDanchin, NWhite, HDSantopinto, JBigonzi, FHecquet, CVittori, L
- [23] Underuse of reperfusion therapy in female patients: Insights from the TETAMI study and registry (The safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and of tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction)JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 358A - 358ACohen, MGensini, GFMaritz, FGurfinkel, EPHuber, KTimerman, AKrzeminska-Pakula, MDanchin, NWhite, HDVittori, L
- [24] Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin:: The ACUTE II studyAMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (03) : 470 - 477Cohen, MThéroux, PBorzak, SFrey, MJWhite, HDVan Mieghem, WSenatore, FLis, JMukherjee, RHarris, KBigonzi, F
- [25] Regional block anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia. Are different antithrombotic drugs equally effective in patients undergoing hip replacement? Retrospective analysis of 2354 patients undergoing hip replacement receiving either recombinant hirudin, unfractionated heparin or enoxaparinTHROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 1997, : P1992 - P1992Eriksson, BIEkman, SBaur, MLindbratt, SBach, DKalebo, PClose, P
- [26] 2-year survival among elderly hospitalised for acute respiratory infection versus hip fracture: a useful comparison to raise awarenessEUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2020, 29 (158):Guillon, AntoineMizgerd, Joseph P.Grammatico-Guillon, Leslie
- [27] ENOXAPARIN VERSUS UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN FOR THE NON-INVASIVE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES (NSTE-ACS): THE PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION IN RUSSIAVALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A150 - A150Syrov, A.Zyryanov, S.Belousov, Y. B.
- [28] Characteristics and outcome of patients presenting with ST elevation MI ineligible for reperfusion therapy in the Tetami study [the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin and of tirofiban versus placebo in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction]CIRCULATION, 2000, 102 (18) : 795 - 795Cohen, MGensini, GFMaritz, FTimerman, ADanchin, NHuber, KGurfinkel, EPWhite, HDFox, KAAVittori, LLe-Louer, VBigonzi, F
- [29] Effect of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) trialAMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 154 (06) : 1078 - 1084.e1Morrow, David A.Antman, Elliott M.Murphy, Sabina A.Qin, JieRuda, MikhailGuneri, SemaJacob, Ashok JosephBudaj, AndrejBraunwald, Eugene