Improvements in Circumpolar Southern Hemisphere Extratropical Atmospheric Circulation in CMIP6 Compared to CMIP5

被引:48
|
作者
Bracegirdle, T. J. [1 ]
Holmes, C. R. [1 ]
Hosking, J. S. [1 ]
Marshall, G. J. [1 ]
Osman, M. [2 ]
Patterson, M. [3 ]
Rackow, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, England
[2] CONICET UBA, CIMA, Ctr Invest Mar & Atmosfera, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Oxford, Atmospher Ocean & Planetary Phys, Oxford, England
[4] Helmholtz Ctr Polar & Marine Res, Alfred Wegener Inst, Bremerhaven, Germany
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
EDDY-DRIVEN JET; ANNULAR MODE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WEST ANTARCTICA; AGULHAS LEAKAGE; SENSITIVITY; OCEAN; VARIABILITY; WESTERLIES; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1029/2019EA001065
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
One of the major globally relevant systematic biases in previous generations of climate models has been an equatorward bias in the latitude of the Southern Hemisphere (SII) mid-latitude tropospheric eddy driven westerly jet. The far-reaching implications of this for Southern Ocean heat and carbon uptake and Antarctic land and sea ice are key reasons why addressing this bias is a high priority. It is therefore of primary importance to evaluate the representation of the Si! westerly jet in the latest generation of global climate and earth system models that comprise the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). In this paper we assess the representation of major indices of SH extratropical atmospheric circulation in CMIP6 by comparison against both observations and the previous generation of CMIP5 models. Indices assessed are the latitude and speed of the westerly jet, variability of the Southern Annular Mode (SAM), and representation of the Amundsen Sea Low (ASL). These are calculated from the historical forcing simulations of both CMIP5 and CMTP6 for time periods matching available observational and reanalysis data sets. From the 39 CMIP6 models available at the time of writing there is an overall reduction in the equatorward bias of the annual mean westerly jet from 1.9 degrees in CMIP5 to 0.4 degrees in CMIP6 and from a seasonal perspective the reduction is clearest in austral spring and summer. This is accompanied by a halving of the bias of SAM decorrelation timescales compared to CMIP5. However, no such overall improvements arc evident for the ASL. Plain Language Summary Computer models that simulate the position, strength, and spatio-temporal behavior of winds in the Southern Hemisphere around the continent of Antarctica often show typical errors when compared to reality. This can impact answers to very relevant questions, such as how much heat and carbon are taken up by the ocean or how the sea ice cover will evolve in the future. Here we document how the newly available next generation of global climate models that form the basis for the next Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) performs with respect to observed Southern Hemisphere winds. We also analyze potential improvements compared to the previous generation of computer models. Overall, some important differences to observations (biases) are much smaller than in the previous models (by up to 50%). Other diagnostics are, however, virtually unchanged, which indicates that the improvements are rather limited between model generations. However, our study could help to identify possible reasons for the remaining biases and to further reduce errors in upcoming models.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model uncertainty in synoptic circulation patterns and precipitation changes in Southern South America using CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Olmo, Matias Ezequiel
    Bettolli, Maria Laura
    Balmaceda-Huarte, Rocio
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2023, 176 (12)
  • [22] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [23] Effects of prescribed CMIP6 ozone on simulating the Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation response to ozone depletion
    Ivanciu, Ioana
    Matthes, Katja
    Wahl, Sebastian
    Harlass, Jan
    Biastoch, Arne
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (08) : 5777 - 5806
  • [24] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [25] Simulations of ENSO Phase-Locking in CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Chen, Han-Ching
    Jin, Fei-Fei
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (12) : 5135 - 5149
  • [26] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Hu, Jinggao
    Liu, Zexuan
    Xu, Haiming
    Ren, Rongcai
    Jin, Dachao
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [27] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Chen, Jie
    JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [28] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Jinggao HU
    Zexuan LIU
    Haiming XU
    Rongcai REN
    Dachao JIN
    Science China(Earth Sciences), 2023, 66 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [29] Climate Model Projections for Canada: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Sobie, S. R.
    Zwiers, F. W.
    Curry, C. L.
    ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN, 2021, 59 (4-5) : 269 - 284
  • [30] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Jinggao Hu
    Zexuan Liu
    Haiming Xu
    Rongcai Ren
    Dachao Jin
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2023, 66 : 129 - 145