Workplace incivility and bystanders' helping intentions

被引:11
|
作者
Jungert, Tomas [1 ]
Holm, Kristoffer [2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Fac Social Sci, Dept Psychol, Lund, Sweden
[2] Malmo Univ, Ctr Work Life & Evaluat Studies, Dept Urban Studies, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Workplace incivility; Motivation to intervene; Power; Severity; Bystander behaviour; Prosocial behaviour; ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIORS; ABUSIVE SUPERVISION; SELF-DETERMINATION; POWER DISTANCE; VICTIMS; INTERVENTION; JUDGMENTS; RUDENESS; GENDER; TIME;
D O I
10.1108/IJCMA-08-2021-0131
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Purpose Using observational and experimental designs, the purpose of this study was to explore if the power relation between the offender and the victim of incivility and the level of perceived severity of the incivility were associated with bystanders' intentions to help when witnessing workplace incivility. Design/methodology/approach In Study 1, 160 participants completed a questionnaire where they described a recent uncivil incident they had witnessed, and completed measures of perceived severity and measures of their behavioural response as bystanders. In Study 2, 183 participants were randomised to read one of two vignettes (a manager being uncivil towards a subordinate or vice versa), and completed measures of perceived severity and of their motivation to intervene. The authors investigated whether the power relation between perpetrator and victim, and the perceived severity of the uncivil exchange, were associated with prosocial bystander behaviours in Study 1 and with motivation to defend the victim of incivility in Study 2. Findings Higher perpetrator power was significantly associated with the incident being perceived as more severe, and higher perpetrator power was directly related to greater tendency to confront, and lower tendency to avoid, the perpetrator. Perpetrator power was indirectly associated with social support according to the perceived severity. A supervisor acting in an uncivil manner was rated as more severe than a subordinate acting in such a way. Perceived severity mediated the relationship between perpetrator power and the witness's introjected, identified and intrinsic motivation to intervene. Originality/value This study extends previous work by investigating how the perpetrator's power influences both the bystander's prosocial behaviour and their motivation to defend the victim. Furthermore, previous research has not considered how perceptions of severity might mediate the relationship between power, behaviour and motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 290
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF WORKPLACE INCIVILITY
    McPherson, Penne
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2020, 47 (02)
  • [22] The role of emotion in workplace incivility
    Sears, Karen
    Humiston, Gail Sears
    JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 30 (04) : 390 - 405
  • [23] Counter Workplace Incivility with Kindness
    Black, Amy C.
    Shank, Bettina
    Rice, Mary Eve
    JOURNAL OF CHRISTIAN NURSING, 2025, 42 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [24] Assessing and attacking workplace incivility
    Pearson, CM
    Andersson, LM
    Porath, CL
    ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2000, 29 (02) : 123 - 137
  • [25] Growing Concerns With Workplace Incivility
    Collins, Natasha Renee
    Rogers, Bonnie
    WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY, 2017, 65 (11) : 564 - 564
  • [26] A Survey of Incivility in the OT Workplace
    Bolding, Deborah J.
    McCallister, Cameron
    Poisson, Kate
    Pufki, David
    Ramirez, Angelica
    Rickley, Claire
    Scattini, Victoria
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2021, 75
  • [27] Workplace incivility: a concept analysis
    Vagharseyyedin, Seyyed Abolfazl
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2015, 50 (01) : 115 - 125
  • [28] Workplace Incivility, Bullying, and Mobbing
    Wachs, Joy
    AAOHN JOURNAL, 2009, 57 (02): : 88 - 88
  • [29] Workplace incivility - State of the science
    Hutton, SA
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 36 (01): : 22 - 27
  • [30] Workplace incivility: a literature review
    Vasconcelos, Anselmo Ferreira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (05) : 513 - 542