Hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant era: A clinicopathologic analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Nart, D [1 ]
Arikan, C
Akyildiz, M
Yuce, G
Demirpolat, G
Zeytunlu, M
Karasu, Z
Aydogdu, S
Killi, R
Yuzer, Y
Tokat, Y
Kilic, M
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Paediat Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[4] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[5] Ege Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.10.076
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors in the world, and the prognosis is usually poor. Today, liver transplantation (LT) is a radical but frequently curative treatment modality for HCC. In selected patients, it cures HCC and the underlying cirrhosis at the same time. The present clinicopathological study examined the importance of tumor characteristics for their effects on recurrence and survival rates after LT for HCC. Forty-two native hepatectomy specimens among 250 consecutive orthotopic liver transplantations contained HCC. Patients were predominantly men (30 men, 12 women), ranging in age from 1 to 61 years (median 51). While 20 patients received cadaveric organs, 22 were transplanted from living donors. In 14 patients (33%) HCC presented as a solitary nodule, 5 (12%) as two nodules; 2 (5%) as three nodules; and 21 patients (50%) as more than three nodules. The maximal diameter of the largest tumor not larger than 3 cm in 28 patients (66%), exceeding this size in 14 patients (34%). There was a significant correlation between nodule number and tumor size (r = 0.36, P = 0.05). While 23 patients had no sign of vascular involvement, 17 tumors showed microscopic invasion and two large vessel involvement. There was a positive correlation between vascular invasion and nodule number (r = 0.41, P = 0.05). The histopathological grade of differentiation of the tumors was assessed as "well" in seven patients (14%), moderate in 28 (72%), and poor in 7 (14%). The differentiation was significantly poorer when vascular invasion was observed (r = 0.43, P = .01). According to the TNM classification, 11 patients (26%) were stage I, 6 (14%) stage II, 13 (31%) stage III, and 12 (29%) stage IV. After a median follow-up of 10 months (1-50 months), the overall mortality was 18% (n = 8). Patient survival at 6 month, 1, and 4 years was 88%, 80%, and 60%, respectively. The outcome was significantly poorer for TNM stage IV versus stage I, II, and III tumors to (P = .02). Tumor recurred in three patients at 4,6, and 50 months after liver transplantation. The sites of recurrence were bone, lung, and adrenal glands. In conclusion, liver transplantation represents a safe and feasible treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with excellent outcomes compared with other treatment modalities. Liver transplantation offers excellent survival rates and chance for cure in stages I, II, and III hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2986 / 2990
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of Metformin in Liver Transplant Recipient With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Choi, J.
    Lee, K.
    Rhu, J.
    Gil, E.
    Na, B.
    Oh, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 750 - 750
  • [42] Management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplant
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 7 (08) : 1142 - 1148
  • [43] Clinicopathologic Review and Outcome of 31 Cases of Liver Transplant with Both Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma
    Tranesh, Ghassan
    Lee, David
    Krishna, Murli
    Patel, Tushar
    Nguyen, Justin
    Harnois, Denise
    Nakhleh, Raouf E.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 96 : 426A - 427A
  • [45] Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Management after the transplant
    Verna, Elizabeth C.
    Patel, Yuval A.
    Aggarwal, Avin
    Desai, Archita P.
    Frenette, Catherine
    Pillai, Anjana A.
    Salgia, Reena
    Seetharam, Anil
    Sharma, Pratima
    Sherman, Courtney
    Tsoulfas, Georgios
    Yao, Francis Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (02) : 333 - 347
  • [46] A New Liver Transplant Priority for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Grazi, Gian Luca
    Vetrone, Gaetano
    Kimura, Takuya
    Zanello, Matteo
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Cescon, Matteo
    Varotti, Giovanni
    Del Gaudio, Massimo
    Tuci, Francesco
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    La Barba, Giuliano
    Vivarelli, Marco
    Lauro, Augusto
    Ramacciato, Giovanni
    Pinna, Antonio Daniele
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 55 (86-87) : 1742 - 1745
  • [47] Liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience in a Saudi population
    Allam, Naglaa
    Khalaf, Hatem
    Fagih, Mosa
    Al-Sebayel, Mohamed
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 6 (01) : 14 - 24
  • [48] Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Orthotopic Liver Transplant
    Bansal, Sourav
    Dommaraju, Sunil
    Thaker, Sarang
    Karimi, Saman
    Guzman, Grace
    Di Cocco, Pierpaolo
    Benedetti, Enrico
    Koppe, Sean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S1991 - S1991
  • [49] Management of liver transplant patients with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Safak, Adem
    Karakaya, Emre
    Yildirim, Sedat
    Okyay, Ozan
    Boyvat, Fatih
    Tseveldorj, Nomingerel
    Boyacioglu, Sedat
    Haberal, Mehmet A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 648 - 648
  • [50] Benefit of downsizing hepatocellular carcinoma in a liver transplant population
    Jang, J. W.
    You, C. R.
    Kim, C. W.
    Bae, S. H.
    Yoon, S. K.
    Yoo, Y. K.
    Kim, D. G.
    Choi, J. Y.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 31 (03) : 415 - 423