Geofoam blocks to protect buried pipelines subjected to strike-slip fault rupture

被引:30
|
作者
Rasouli, Habib [1 ]
Fatahi, Behzad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Geosynthetics; Geofoam; Pipeline; Permanent ground deformation; Strike-slip fault; EPS GEOFOAM; INTERNAL DRAINAGE; BEHAVIOR; PIPES; EARTHQUAKE; REMEDIATION; PERFORMANCE; RESISTANCE; GAS; REINFORCEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.011
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper proposes using geofoam blocks to improve the safety of buried steel pipelines under permanent ground deformation due to strike-slip fault rupture. Since these geofoam blocks are deformable, they can compress during fault rupture and thus reduce the pressure imposed on the pipeline by the surrounding soil. This means that the pipe can sustain a higher level of tectonic deformations. For the pipeline system adopted in this study, the geofoam blocks consist of two 1 m thick blocks at each side and another on the top of the pipeline. The effectiveness of this configuration is then assessed in comparison to the conventional buried pipeline by three dimensional numerical simulations that consider the interaction between soil and structure and the impact of critical parameters such as the pipeline-fault trace crossing angle, geofoam blocks thickness and the internal pressure of the pipeline. The results indicated that the geofoam blocks reduced the axial tensile strain of non-pressurised pipeline from the unacceptable 4.16% to the safe level of 0.75% when the crossing angle was 135 degrees. In addition, geofoam blocks successfully decreased the maximum ovalisation parameter and compressive strain of the non-pressurised pipeline from 0.237 and - 25.8% to 0.065 and - 0.47%, respectively when the crossing angle was 65 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 274
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of fault steps on rupture termination of strike-slip earthquake faults
    Li, Zhengfang
    Zhou, Bengang
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2018, 22 (02) : 487 - 498
  • [32] Dextral strike-slip evidence on seismic slice for Tanlu strike-slip fault
    Peng, Wen-Xu
    Shi, Hao
    Sun, He-Feng
    Yu, Hai-Bo
    Zheng, Jiang-Feng
    Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009, 44 (06): : 755 - 759
  • [33] The 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake: Rupture of a blind strike-slip fault
    Talebian, M
    Fielding, EJ
    Funning, GJ
    Ghorashi, M
    Jackson, J
    Nazari, H
    Parsons, B
    Priestley, K
    Rosen, PA
    Walker, R
    Wright, TJ
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (11) : L116111 - 4
  • [34] Hypocentral dependent shallow slip distribution and rupture extents along a strike-slip fault
    Yao, Suli
    Yang, Hongfeng
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 578
  • [35] Behaviour of buried continuous pipelines crossing strike-slip faults: Experimental and numerical study
    Demirci, Hasan Emre
    Karaman, Mustafa
    Bhattacharya, Subhamoy
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 92
  • [36] Appropriate pipe length for numerical modeling of buried pipelines crossing strike-slip faults
    Mohammad Reza Radaei
    Mohammad Hossein Erami
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2022, 7
  • [37] Nonlinear structural responses of the buried oval steel pipelines crossing strike-slip faults
    Zhang, Shiyi
    Li, Zhaochao
    Bu, Rui
    Shen, Meiling
    STRUCTURES, 2024, 69
  • [38] Appropriate pipe length for numerical modeling of buried pipelines crossing strike-slip faults
    Radaei, Mohammad Reza
    Erami, Mohammad Hossein
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2022, 7 (02)
  • [39] Refinement to the Existing Analytical Methods of Analysis of Buried Pipelines due to Strike-Slip Faulting
    Sabermahany, H.
    Bastami, M.
    CIVIL ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURES JOURNAL-CEIJ, 2019, 52 (02): : 309 - 322
  • [40] Mechanical Behavior of Submarine Pipelines under Active Strike-Slip Fault Movement
    Xu, Longjun
    Chen, Yabin
    Liu, Qingyang
    Gardoni, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2018, 9 (03)