Multi-agency Problem in Financial Markets

被引:0
|
作者
Magessi, Nuno Trindade [1 ]
Antunes, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, MAS, BioISI, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
AGENCY; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multi-Agency problem occurs in Financial Markets, when multiple companies face agency problems at the same time, in different companies. It happens, when different shareholders' types entering in conflict in order to maximise their benefits. This article explores the agency conflict between controlling shareholders and minor shareholders. This type of conflict arises from arbitrary power that sometimes major shareholders have, over small ones. In order to understand this multilateral conflict occurring in different companies, at the same time, it was created a multi-agent model where different agents' type interact each other in an artificial financial market. The interaction occurs under the assumptions of a game theory, which means that multiple games happen among shareholders in different companies at the same time. In this specific study, we also added the agent who retaliates to the incursions of other agents. This article analyses the type of agents that constantly "wins the fights" in distinct scenarios previously simulated. After several simulations, it could be concluded that the initial structure of shareholders in a companies has impact in how the multiple games end up. Another important result that was achieved is about the gap between the value to be distributed among shareholders and consequent agency costs. Shareholders give more relevance to the value rather than agency costs that they can face out. This means that if the gap is negative because of the value, the shareholders may abandon the market and the same doesn't happen, when it comes from a raise of the agency costs.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 183
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systemic Approach to Multi-agency Community Safety
    Taylor, Mark John
    Higgins, Emma
    Francis, Hulya
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 32 (03) : 344 - 357
  • [22] A NURSING CAMP - A MULTI-AGENCY COOPERATIVE EFFORT
    SCHEFFEL, AL
    SWANSON, EA
    POTTER, M
    TRIOLO, PK
    JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 1992, 22 (04): : 53 - 57
  • [23] Leading for public value in multi-agency collaboration
    Parker, Steven
    Hartley, Jean
    Beashel, Jim
    Vo, Quoc
    PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 38 (01) : 83 - 106
  • [24] FUNCTIONAL COORDINATION OF MULTI-AGENCY PROGRAMS - SYMPOSIUM
    CRAWFORD, RD
    BERNSTEIN, GS
    LONDON, GD
    FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1970, 2 (01): : 38 - 41
  • [25] Excalibur: Multi-agency intervention and support barometer
    Stein, Samuel
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 20 (01) : S62 - S62
  • [26] MULTI-AGENCY PLANNING FOR NATURAL AREAS IN TENNESSEE
    PEARSALL, S
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1984, 44 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [27] Information sharing practice in multi-agency working
    Peel, Michelle
    Rowley, Jennifer
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 62 (01): : 11 - 28
  • [28] Arrest referral - a proactive multi-agency approach
    Seeling, C
    King, C
    Metcalfe, E
    Tober, G
    Bates, S
    DRUGS-EDUCATION PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2001, 8 (04) : 327 - 333
  • [29] A MULTI-AGENCY AND COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO TACKLING CYBERCRIME
    Smith, Paul A.
    Sugiura, Lisa
    Howard, Samantha
    Karagiannopoulos, Vasileios
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 277 : 57 - 57
  • [30] Sole agency vs multi-agency: an investigation of agency practice across England and Wales
    Ke, Qiulin
    Jayne, Michael
    Isaac, David
    PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (04) : 228 - +