Correlation between Contact Angle and Surface Roughness of Silicon Carbide Wafers

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, Jung Gon [1 ]
Yoo, Woo Sik [1 ]
Kim, Woo Yeon [2 ]
Lee, Won Jae [2 ]
机构
[1] WaferMasters Inc, Dublin, CA 94568 USA
[2] Dong Eui Univ, Dept Adv Mat Engn, Busan 47340, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1149/2162-8777/ac3ad0
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Two-inch diameter 6H-SiC wafers were sliced from a SiC ingot and the wafers were ground and polished using different diamond slurries (1 mu m and 0.1 mu m in particles size) to investigate their dependence on wetting on surface roughness (Ra) and polarity using precisely dispensed de-ionized (DI) water drops. The Ra of the Si-face (0001) SiC wafer, after grinding and polishing, was 5.6 and 1.6 nm, respectively, as measured by atomic force microscopy (AFM). For C-face (000-1) SiC wafers, the Ra was 7.2 nm after grinding and 3.3 nm after polishing. The average contact angle measurement of the SiC wafers after final polishing showed clear differences between surface polarity; the contact angle for the Si-face (0001) was similar to 7 degrees greater than that for the C-face (000-1). The difference in contact angles between the Si-face (0001) and the C-face (000-1) tends to increase as the reduction of surface roughness approaches the final stage of polishing. The uniformity of Raman peak intensity in the folded transverse optical phonon band at similar to 780 cm(-1) in scanned areas correlated well with the surface roughness measured by AFM. The contact angle measurement can be used as a convenient surface polarity and surface roughness testing technique for SiC wafers. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published on behalf of The Electrochemical Society by IOP Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationship between permeate flux and surface roughness of membranes with similar water contact angle values
    Woo, Sahng Hyuck
    Park, Jinwon
    Min, Byoung Ryul
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 146 : 187 - 191
  • [43] SURFACE-ROUGHNESS OF SILICON-WAFERS ON DIFFERENT LATERAL LENGTH SCALES
    MALIK, IJ
    PIROOZ, S
    SHIVE, LW
    DAVENPORT, AJ
    VITUS, CM
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1993, 140 (05) : L75 - L77
  • [44] Bondability and surface roughness of ultra-thin single crystal silicon wafers
    Beggans, M
    Farmer, K
    Federici, J
    Digges, TG
    Garofalini, S
    Hensley, D
    SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER BONDING: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND APPLICATIONS IV, 1998, 36 : 64 - 71
  • [45] Ultrahydrophobic surfaces: Relation between roughness and contact angle hysteresis
    Hennig, A
    Grundke, K
    Frenzel, R
    Stamm, M
    TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS, 2002, 39 (06) : 243 - 246
  • [46] Comparative study of the surface roughness of Nicalon and Tyranno silicon carbide fibres
    Vanswijgenhoven, E
    Lambrinou, K
    Wevers, M
    Van Der Biest, O
    COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 1998, 29 (11) : 1417 - 1423
  • [47] Analysis of contact and bending stiffness for Curvic couplings considering contact angle and surface roughness
    Yu, Younghun
    Lee, Bora
    Cho, Yongjoo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART E-JOURNAL OF PROCESS MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 233 (06) : 1257 - 1267
  • [48] Turning Non-Sticking Surface into Sticky Surface: Correlation between Surface Topography and Contact Angle Hysteresis
    Bai, Jingyuan
    Wang, Xuejiao
    Zhang, Meilin
    Yang, Zhou
    Zhang, Jin
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (09)
  • [49] Effect of contact line roughness on contact angle
    Rusanov, AI
    MENDELEEV COMMUNICATIONS, 1996, (01) : 30 - 31
  • [50] Fluid contact angle on solid surfaces: Role of multiscale surface roughness
    Bottiglione, F.
    Carbone, G.
    Persson, B. N. J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 143 (13):