Team-based model for non-operating room airway management: validation using a simulation-based study

被引:2
|
作者
DeMaria, S., Jr. [1 ]
Berman, D. J. [1 ]
Goldberg, A. [1 ]
Lin, H. -M. [1 ]
Khelemsky, Y. [1 ]
Levine, A. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Anesthesiol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl Box 1010, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
airway management; high-fidelity simulation; team-based anaesthesia; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; TRACHEAL INTUBATIONS; COMPLICATIONS; EDUCATION; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aew121
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Non-operating room(non-OR) airway management has previously been identified as an area of concern because it carries a significant risk for complications. One reason for this could be attributed to the independent practice of residents in these situations. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether differences in performance exist between residents working alone vs with a resident partner when encountering simulated non-OR airway management scenarios. Methods: Thirty-six anaesthesia residents were randomized into two groups. Each group experienced three separate scenarios (two scenarios initially and then a third 6 weeks later). The scenarios consisted of one control scenario and two critical event scenarios [i.e. asystole during laryngoscopy and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) upon post-intubation institution of positive pressure ventilation]. One group experienced the simulated non-OR scenarios alone (Solo group). The other group consisted of resident pairs, participating in the same three scenarios (Team group). Results: Although the time to intubation did not differ between the Solo and Team groups, there were several differences in performance. The Team group received better overall performance ratings for the asystole (8.5 vs 5.5 out of 10; P<0.001) and PEA (8.5 vs 5.8 out of 10; P<0.001) scenarios. The Team group was also able to recognize asystole and PEA conditions faster than the Solo group [10.1 vs 23.5 s (P<0.001) and 13.3 vs 36.0 s (P<0.001), respectively]. Conclusions: Residents who performed a simulated intubation with a second trained provider had better overall performance than those who practised independently. The residents who practised in a group were also faster to diagnose serious complications, including peri-intubation asystole and PEA. Given these data, it is reasonable that training programmes consider performing all non-OR airway management with a team-based method.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 108
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Eye-tracking during simulation-based neonatal airway management
    Michael Wagner
    Peter Gröpel
    Katharina Bibl
    Monika Olischar
    Marc A. Auerbach
    Isabel T. Gross
    Pediatric Research, 2020, 87 : 518 - 522
  • [42] Eye-tracking during simulation-based neonatal airway management
    Wagner, Michael
    Groepel, Peter
    Bibl, Katharina
    Olischar, Monika
    Auerbach, Marc A.
    Gross, Isabel T.
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2020, 87 (03) : 518 - 522
  • [43] A SIMULATION-BASED APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF UNCERTAINTY ON PATIENT WAITING TIME IN THE OPERATING ROOM
    Rifi, Leah
    Fontanili, Franck
    Martinez, Clea
    Di Mascolo, Maria
    Fortineau, Virginie
    2022 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2022, : 1057 - 1068
  • [44] The Timing of Simulation-Based Scenario Implementation in Patient Safety Education: The Example of the Operating Room
    Ocaktan, Nermin
    Uslu, Yasemin
    Kanig, Merve
    Unver, Vesile
    Karabacak, Ukke
    CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2020, 48 : 80 - 88
  • [45] A Failure Model Library for Simulation-Based Validation of Functional Safety
    Munaro, Tiziano
    Muntean, Irina
    Pretschner, Alexander
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2024, 2024, 14988 : 18 - 32
  • [46] Team factors influence emotions and stress in a non-operating room anesthetizing location. A Qualitative interview study among anesthesia clinicians
    Schroeck, Hedwig
    Dong, June
    Jacobi, Sophia
    Taenzer, Andreas
    Schifferdecker, Karen
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 132 (5S_SUPPL): : 672 - 675
  • [47] A simulation-based apheresis platelet inventory management model
    Asllani, Arben
    Culler, Elizabeth
    Ettkin, Lawrence
    TRANSFUSION, 2014, 54 (10) : 2730 - 2735
  • [48] Non-deterministic model validation methodology for simulation-based safety assessment of automated vehicles?
    Riedmaier, Stefan
    Schneider, Jakob
    Danquah, Benedikt
    Schick, Bernhard
    Diermeyer, Frank
    SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2021, 109
  • [49] Trauma Non-Technical Training (TNT-2): the development, piloting and multilevel assessment of a simulation-based, interprofessional curriculum for team-based trauma resuscitation
    Doumouras, Aristithes G.
    Keshet, Itay
    Nathens, Avery B.
    Ahmed, Najma
    Hicks, Christopher M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 57 (05) : 354 - 355
  • [50] Using Simulation-Based Training to Enhance Management Education
    Salas, Eduardo
    Wildman, Jessica L.
    Piccolo, Ronald F.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2009, 8 (04) : 559 - 573