Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Responsiveness, Minimal Detectable Change, and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Patients With Improved Performance After Stroke Rehabilitation
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Chuang, Li-ling
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Lee, Shin-da
    Hong, Wei-hsien
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (08): : 1281 - 1287
  • [12] Responsiveness and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for HM-PRO in Patients with Hematological Malignancies
    Goswami, Pushpendra
    Oliva, Esther Natalie
    Ionova, Tatyana
    Salek, Sam
    BLOOD, 2018, 132
  • [13] The Wisconsin gait scale - The minimal clinically important difference
    Guzik, Agnieszka
    Druzbickia, Mariusz
    Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
    Przysada, Grzegorz
    Kwolek, Andrzej
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 68 : 453 - 457
  • [14] Minimal clinically important difference of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale in Parkinson's disease
    Kluger, Benzi M.
    Garimella, Sanjana
    Garvan, Cynthia
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2017, 43 : 101 - 104
  • [15] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Chen, Poyu
    Lin, Keh-Chung
    Liing, Rong-Jiuan
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Chia-Ling
    Chang, Ku-Chou
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (06) : 1585 - 1596
  • [16] Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation
    Poyu Chen
    Keh-Chung Lin
    Rong-Jiuan Liing
    Ching-Yi Wu
    Chia-Ling Chen
    Ku-Chou Chang
    Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 1585 - 1596
  • [17] Establishing minimal clinically important difference of modified dynamic gait index in people with subacute stroke
    Mestanza Mattos, Fabiola Giovanna
    Bowman, Thomas
    Allera Longo, Cristina
    Bocini, Serena
    Gennuso, Michele
    Marazzini, Francesca
    Materazzi, Francesco Giuseppe
    Pelosin, Elisa
    Putzolu, Martina
    Salvalaggio, Silvia
    Turolla, Andrea
    Mezzarobba, Susanna
    Cattaneo, Davide
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2025,
  • [18] Minimal clinically important differenceof fatigue severity scale in patients with chronic stroke
    Taghizadeh, Ghorban
    Sarlak, Nazanin
    Fallah, Soheila
    Sharabiani, Parvaneh Taghavi Azar
    Cheraghifard, Moslem
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 33 (04):
  • [19] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients
    Henrik H Lauridsen
    Jan Hartvigsen
    Claus Manniche
    Lars Korsholm
    Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7
  • [20] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in patients with Parkinson's disease
    Godi, Marco
    Arcolin, Ilaria
    Giardini, Marica
    Corna, Stefano
    Schieppati, Marco
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2020, 80 : 14 - 19