Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke

被引:98
|
作者
Chen, Chia-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chung-Yao [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Hsieh-Ching [5 ]
Wu, Ching-Yi [1 ,6 ]
Lin, Keh-Chung [7 ,8 ]
Hsieh, Yu-Wei [6 ]
Shen, I-Hsuan [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, 5 Fu Hsing St, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Early Intervent, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Keelung, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Div Occupat Therapy, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Stroke; Muscle spasticity; Minimal clinically important difference; Psychometrics; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RELIABILITY; SPASTICITY; OUTCOMES; INTERRATER; CRITERIA; TOOLS; INDEX; TONE;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05545-X
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a major problem in patients with stroke and influences their activities of daily living, participation, and quality of life. The Modified Ashworth Scale is widely used to assess spasticity. However, the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke have not been explored. AIM: This study aims to examine the responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Longitudinal six-month follow-up study. SETTING: Rehabilitation wards of a tertiary hospital. POPULATION: One-hundred and fifteen patients with stroke were recruited. METHODS: All patients underwent the assessment of Modified Ashworth Scale for the upper extremity (flexors of the elbow, wrist, and fingers) and the lower extremity (hip adductor, knee flexor, and ankle plantar flexor) at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The average Modified Ashworth Scale scores of the upper and lower extremity muscles were obtained for analysis. Responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale was determined using standardized mean response, and the minimal clinically important differences were determined using a distribution-based approach with Effect Sizes of 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations. RESULTS: The responsiveness of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the upper and lower extremity muscles was marked (standardized response mean = 0.89-1.09). The minimal clinically important differences of the average Modified Ashworth Scale of Effect Sizes 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviations for the upper extremity muscles were 0.48 and 0.76, respectively, while those for the lower extremity muscles were 0.45 and 0.73, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Ashworth Scale was markedly responsive in detecting the changes in muscle tone in patients with stroke. The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study can be used by researchers and clinicians in determining whether the observed changes are clinically meaningful post-treatment or at follow-up. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The minimal clinically important differences of the Modified Ashworth Scale reported in this study will enable clinicians and researchers in determining whether changes in the muscle tone are true and clinically meaningful, and can be used as a reference for clinical decision-making. Key words: stroke, muscle spasticity, minimal clinically important difference, psychometrics
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 760
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study of the Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Trunk Impairment Scale in Patients With Acute Stroke
    Ishiwatari, Masahiro
    Takahara, Tsuyoshi
    Hayakawa, Masato
    Ogawa, Akihiro
    Kido, Satoshi
    ADVANCES IN REHABILITATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2023, 12
  • [2] Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in Stroke Patients
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Fu, Tiffany
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Wang, Yen-ho
    Liu, Jung-sen
    Hsieh, Ching-ju
    Lin, Shih-fan
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2010, 24 (05) : 486 - 492
  • [3] Responsiveness, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, and Validity of the MoCA in Stroke Rehabilitation
    Wu, Ching-Yi
    Hung, Shuan-Ju
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Chen, Kai-Hua
    Chen, Poyu
    Tsay, Pei-Kwei
    OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY INTERNATIONAL, 2019,
  • [4] The minimal clinically important difference of the Participation Measurement Scale in chronic stroke
    Kossi, Oyene
    Silva, Soraia M.
    Lena, Francesco
    Agbetou, Mendinatou
    Adoukonou, Thierry
    Feys, Peter
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2025, 81 (01)
  • [5] Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in Patients with Stroke
    Agustin, Rodrigo Martin-San
    Crisostomo, Ma Jose
    Sanchez-Martinez, Ma Piedad
    Medina-Mirapeix, Francesc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (05) : 1 - 12
  • [6] Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimal clinically important difference of the sitting balance scale and function in sitting test in people with stroke
    Alzyoud, Jehad
    Medley, Ann
    Thompson, Mary
    Csiza, Linda
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 38 (02) : 327 - 336
  • [7] Validation of the minimal clinically important difference for modified activities assessment scale
    Neela, Niharika
    Olavarria, Oscar A.
    Rondon, Alexis P.
    Bernardi, Karla
    Shah, Puja
    Dhanani, Naila
    Lyons, Nicole
    Matta, Eduardo J.
    Hasapes, Joseph P.
    Liang, Mike K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 223 (04): : 770 - 773
  • [8] Validity, Responsiveness, and Clinically Important Difference of the ABILHAND Questionnaire in Patients With Stroke
    Wang, Tien-ni
    Lin, Keh-chung
    Wu, Ching-yi
    Chung, Chia-ying
    Pei, Yu-cheng
    Teng, Yu-kuei
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (07): : 1086 - 1091
  • [9] Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke
    Beninato, M
    Gill-Body, KM
    Salles, S
    Stark, PC
    Black-Schaffer, RM
    Stein, J
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (01): : 32 - 39
  • [10] Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients
    Hsieh, Yu-Wei
    Wang, Chun-Hou
    Wu, Shwu-Chong
    Chen, Pau-Chung
    Sheu, Ching-Fan
    Hsieh, Ching-Lin
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2007, 21 (03) : 233 - 238