How do Clinicians View the Process of Shared Decision-Making with Parents Facing Extremely Early Deliveries? Results from an Online Survey

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Brennan Hodgson [1 ]
Krick, Jeanne [2 ]
Schneider, Simone [3 ]
Montes, Andres [4 ]
Anani, Uchenna E. [5 ]
Murray, Peter D. [6 ]
Arnolds, Marin [7 ]
Feltman, Dalia M. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Pediat, Comer Childrens Hosp, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Pediat, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] St Josephs Candler Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Savannah, GA USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[6] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Pediat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] NorthShore Univ HealthSyst, Evanston Hosp, Evanston, IL USA
[9] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
antenatal counseling; decision-making; extreme prematurity; maternal-fetal medicine; neonatology; ethical barriers; resuscitation; PHYSICIAN GENDER; INTENSIVE-CARE; RESUSCITATION; VIABILITY; LIFE; NEONATOLOGISTS; COMMUNICATION; OBSTETRICIANS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1742186
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The objective of this study was to better understand how neonatology (Neo) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians approach the process of shared decision-making (SDM) with parents facing extremely premature (<25 weeks estimated gestational age) delivery during antenatal counseling. Study Design Attending physicians at U.S. centers with both Neo and MFM fellowships were invited to answer an original online survey about antenatal counseling for extremely early newborns. Preferences for conveying information are reported elsewhere. Here, we report clinicians' self-assessments of their ability to engage in deliberations and decision-making and perceptions of what is important to parents in the SDM process. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed respondents' views with respect to individual characteristics, such as specialty, gender, and years of clinical experience. Results In total, 74 MFMs and 167 Neos representing 94% of the 81 centers surveyed responded. Neos versus MFMs reported repeat visits with parents less often (<0.001) and agreed that parents were more likely to have made delivery room decisions before they counseled them less often ( p < 0.001). Respondents reported regularly achieving most goals of SDM, with the exception of providing spiritual support. Most respondents reported that spiritual and religious views, risk to an infant's survival, and the infant's quality of life were important to parental decision-making, while a physician's own personal choice and family political views were reported as less important. While many barriers to SDM exist, respondents rated language barriers and family views that differ from those of a provider as the most difficult barriers to overcome. Conclusion This study provides insights into how consultants from different specialties and demographic groups facilitate SDM, thereby informing future efforts for improving counseling and engaging in SDM with parents facing extremely early deliveries and supporting evidence-based training for these complex communication skills.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 721
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Toward the Development of a Core Set of Outcome Domains to Assess Shared Decision-making Interventions in Rheumatology: Results from an OMERACT Delphi Survey and Consensus Meeting
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Barton, Jennifer
    Fraenkel, Liana
    Li, Linda C.
    Brooks, Peter
    De Wit, Maarten
    Stacey, Dawn
    Legare, France
    Meara, Alexa
    Shea, Beverley
    Lyddiatt, Anne
    Hofstetter, Cathie
    Gossec, Laure
    Christensen, Robin
    Scholte-Voshaar, Marieke
    Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
    Boonen, Annelies
    Meade, Tanya
    March, Lyn
    Pohl, Christoph
    Jull, Janet Elizabeth
    Sivarajah, Sigogini
    Campbell, Willemina
    Alten, Rieke
    Karuranga, Suvi
    Morgan, Esi
    Kaufman, Jessica
    Hill, Sophie
    Maxwell, Lara J.
    Welch, Vivian
    Beaton, Dorcas
    El-Miedany, Yasser
    Tugwell, Peter S.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (10) : 1544 - 1550
  • [22] Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?
    Oliveri, Serena
    Ongaro, Giulia
    Cutica, Ilaria
    Menicucci, Giulia
    Belperio, Debora
    Spinella, Francesca
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [23] Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?
    Serena Oliveri
    Giulia Ongaro
    Ilaria Cutica
    Giulia Menicucci
    Debora Belperio
    Francesca Spinella
    Gabriella Pravettoni
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [24] Do collaboRATE Scores Reflect Differences in Perceived Shared Decision-Making Across Diverse Patient Populations? Evidence From a Large-Scale Patient Experience Survey in the United States
    Forcino, Rachel C.
    Thygeson, Marcus
    O'Malley, A. James
    Meinders, Marjan J.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2020, 7 (05): : 778 - 787
  • [25] Patient Confidence and Information Preferences During the Treatment Decision-making Process: Results From a Large Multiple Myeloma Patient Survey Across 12 Countries in Europe and Israel
    Mellqvist, Ulf -Henrik
    Steinmetz, H. Tilman
    Perrot, Aurore
    Aerts, Erik
    Williams, Paul
    Vallejo, Ana
    Morgan, Kate
    Plate, Ananda
    Rodriguez-Leboeuf, Ana Maria
    Desgraz, Renaud
    Franck, Eva Hellqvist
    De Costa, Lucy
    Brescianini, Alessandra
    Ludwig, Heinz
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2023, 23 (05): : E240 - +