The reduction of cotton cultivation in Shandong Province of China Does off-farm employment matter?

被引:0
|
作者
Min, Shi [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Adv Agr Sci, China Ctr Agr Policy, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Off-farm employment; Risk attitude; Cotton cultivation; Three-stage least squares; INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES; BT COTTON; SELF-EMPLOYMENT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ADOPTION; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; PREFERENCES; STRATEGIES; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1108/CAER-10-2016-0176
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the potential causes of the reduction of cotton cultivation in Shandong Province of China from the perspective of smallholders and notably examine the role of off-farm employment. Design/methodology/approach - This paper extends an integrated behavioral model to analyze the relationship between off-farm employment and cotton cultivation by taking into account farmers' risk attitudes. A household survey data of 144 Bt cotton farmers in six villages in Linqing County, Shandong Province conducted in 2012 and 2013 is used. A simultaneous equations model is established and further estimated by using three-stage least squares method. Findings - Although the introduction of Bt cotton has promoted the increase in cotton acreage in China from 1999 to 2007, the planting area of cotton has been decreasing since 2007. The results show the significant correlations among risk attitude, off-farm employment, and cotton cultivation. The planting area of cotton is positively correlated with farmers' willingness to take risk but negatively associated with off-farm employment of family members. The findings imply that the rapid emergence of off-farm labor markets is a major reason for the reduction of cotton acreage in Shandong Province. In the context of the more opportunities of off-farm employment in China, cotton acreage is expected to decrease further. Originality/value - The findings provide a reasonable explanation for the reduction of cotton cultivation in Shandong. This analysis contributes to a better understanding of the relationships among individual risk attitude, off-farm employment, and agricultural behavior, thereby adding to the literature about the application of the integrated behavioral model.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 622
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Does education still pay off in rural China: Revisit the impact of education on off-farm employment and wages
    Zhang, Haiqing
    Zhang, Linxiu
    Luo, Renfu
    Li, Qiang
    CHINA & WORLD ECONOMY, 2008, 16 (02) : 50 - 65
  • [23] Off-farm employment over the past four decades in rural China
    Zhang, Linxiu
    Dong, Yongqing
    Liu, Chengfang
    Bai, Yunli
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 10 (02) : 190 - 214
  • [24] Farm income variability and off-farm employment in Ireland
    Loughrey, Jason
    Hennessy, Thia
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2016, 76 (03) : 378 - 401
  • [25] Reconciling the returns to education in off-farm wage employment in rural China
    de Brauw, Alan
    Rozelle, Scott
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 12 (01) : 57 - 71
  • [26] Does labor off-farm employment inevitably lead to land rent out? Evidence from China
    Xin Deng
    Ding-de Xu
    Miao Zeng
    Yan-bin Qi
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2019, 16 : 689 - 700
  • [27] Does labor off-farm employment inevitably lead to land rent out? Evidence from China
    Deng Xin
    Xu Ding-de
    Zeng Miao
    Qi Yan-bin
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (03) : 689 - 700
  • [28] Does labor off-farm employment inevitably lead to land rent out?Evidence from China
    DENG Xin
    XU Ding-de
    ZENG Miao
    QI Yan-bin
    JournalofMountainScience, 2019, 16 (03) : 689 - 700
  • [29] Does unstable off-farm employment cause stagnant farmland rent-out in rural China?
    Cao, Yueming
    Zhou, Dongjie
    Bai, Yunli
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 16 (03) : 545 - 567
  • [30] Water savings through off-farm employment?
    Castro, Veronica Wachong
    Heerink, Nico
    Shi, Xiaoping
    Qu, Wei
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 2 (02) : 167 - 184