Towards Understanding the Relationships between Interdependence and Trust in Software Development: A Qualitative Research

被引:3
|
作者
Barbosa, Itanaua F. [1 ]
Oliveira, Marcela P. [1 ]
Reis, Priscila B. S. [1 ]
Gomes, Tancicleide C. S. [1 ]
da Silva, Fabio Q. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco UFPE, Ctr Informat CIn, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
interdependence; trust; software teams; software engineering; JOB DESIGN; WORK; POWER;
D O I
10.1109/CHASE.2017.12
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Context: Interdependence deals with the dependence on others that people encounter when executing their tasks. This dependence is influenced by technical, social and psychological factors that affect the way the work is done. Software development is almost always performed by teams. Consequently, trust among team members is likely to affect individual and team performance. Similarly interdependence, as an intrinsic team characteristic, also can influence team performance. Objective: To study the perception of work interdependence and its relation to trust among software engineers that work with agile methods. Method: We selected an organization and performed 6 interviews with a team composed of different roles. We asked about task interdependence perception, trust perception, and the impact of interdependence on trust. Results: Our results show a direct link between factors such as feelings, maturity, and technical level with trust, and its impact on interdependence. Conclusion: This is still a preliminary investigation. Nevertheless, our findings showed that trust is an important psychological factor that can be influenced by both maturity and technical levels.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 69
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Qualitative research on software development: a longitudinal case study methodology
    Laurie McLeod
    Stephen G. MacDonell
    Bill Doolin
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2011, 16 : 430 - 459
  • [22] A Qualitative Investigation of the Relationships Between Foster Care Stakeholders and Research
    Ruff, Saralyn
    Linville, Deanna
    Hawkins, Quanice
    GLOBAL SOCIAL WELFARE, 2024,
  • [23] Advanced Relationships Between Categories Analysis as a Qualitative Research Tool
    Rabinovich, Merav
    Kacen, Lea
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 66 (07) : 698 - 708
  • [24] Towards an Understanding of Software Development Process Knowledge in Very Small Companies
    Basri, Shuib
    O'Connor, Rory V.
    INFORMATICS ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, PT III, 2011, 253 : 62 - 71
  • [25] Towards understanding the impact of mental states on software development using EEG
    Dlamini, Gcinizwe
    Singatullina, Karina
    Succi, Giancarlo
    2022 IEEE/ACS 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2022,
  • [26] Towards an Understanding of Developers' Perceptions of Transparency in Software Development: A Preliminary Study
    Obie, Humphrey O.
    Ukwella, Juliet
    Madampe, Kashumi
    Grundy, John
    Shahin, Mojtaba
    2023 38TH IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS, ASEW, 2023, : 40 - 45
  • [27] Scientific software development viewed as knowledge acquisition: Towards understanding the development of risk-averse scientific software
    Kelly, Diane
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2015, 109 : 50 - 61
  • [28] Understanding the importance of therapeutic relationships in the development of self-management behaviours during cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative research protocol
    Wilkinson, Wendy M.
    Rance, Jaynie
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [29] Understanding Financial Relationships Between Orthopedic Surgeons and Industry for Research
    Tippabhatla, Abhishek
    Silvestre, Jason
    Torres-Izquierdo, Beltran
    Garvin, Lawrence
    Shea, Kevin G.
    Kelly, John D.
    Hosseinzadeh, Pooya
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 47 (03) : 172 - 178
  • [30] The development and disruption of relationships between leaders and organizational members and the importance of trust
    Wilson, Julie A.
    Cunliffe, Ann L.
    LEADERSHIP, 2022, 18 (03) : 359 - 382