Macrovasculature and positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake value in patients with lung cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Pu, Jiantao [1 ,2 ]
Leader, Joseph K. [1 ]
Zhang, Dongning [3 ]
Beeche, Cameron A. [1 ]
Sechrist, Jacob [1 ]
Pennathur, Arjun [3 ]
Villaruz, Liza C. [4 ]
Wilson, David [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Pulm, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer; macrovasculatures; positron emission tomography (PET); standard update value (SUV); FDG-PET; SELECTION; NODULE; CT;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15158
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To investigate the relationship between macrovasculature features and the standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET), which is a surrogate for the metabolic activity of a lung tumor. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 90 lung cancer patients who had both chest CT and PET-CT examinations before receiving cancer treatment. The SUVs in the medical reports were used. We quantified three macrovasculature features depicted on CT images (i.e., vessel number, vessel volume, and vessel tortuosity) and several tumor features (i.e., volume, maximum diameter, mean diameter, surface area, and density). Tumor size (e.g., volume) was used as a covariate to adjust for possible confounding factors. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to develop a model for predicting PET SUV from the relevant image features. The Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. Results PET SUV was positively correlated with vessel volume (R = 0.44, p < 0.001) and vessel number (R = 0.44, p < 0.001) but not with vessel tortuosity (R = 0.124, p > 0.05). After adjusting for tumor size, PET SUV was significantly correlated with vessel tortuosity (R = 0.299, p = 0.004) and vessel number (R = 0.224, p = 0.035), but only marginally correlated with vessel volume (R = 0.187, p = 0.079). The multiple regression model showed a performance with an R-Squared of 0.391 and an adjusted R-Squared of 0.355 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Our investigations demonstrate the potential relationship between macrovasculature and PET SUV and suggest the possibility of inferring the metabolic activity of a lung tumor from chest CT images.
引用
收藏
页码:6237 / 6246
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relationship between tumor mutational burden and maximum standardized uptake value in 2-[18F]FDG PET (positron emission tomography) scan in cancer patients
    Jahromi, Amin Haghighat
    Barkauskas, Donald A.
    Zabel, Matthew
    Goodman, Aaron M.
    Frampton, Garret
    Nikanjam, Mina
    Hoh, Carl K.
    Kurzrock, Razelle
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [32] The value of positron emission tomography (PET) for therapeutic management in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP)
    Rades, D
    Kühnel, G
    Wildfang, I
    Börner, AR
    Knapp, W
    Karstens, JH
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2001, 177 (10) : 525 - 529
  • [33] Relationship between tumor mutational burden and maximum standardized uptake value in 2-[18F]FDG PET (positron emission tomography) scan in cancer patients
    Amin Haghighat Jahromi
    Donald A. Barkauskas
    Matthew Zabel
    Aaron M. Goodman
    Garret Frampton
    Mina Nikanjam
    Carl K. Hoh
    Razelle Kurzrock
    EJNMMI Research, 10
  • [34] Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake Measured by Positron Emission Tomography and Standardized Uptake Value Predicts Long-Term Survival of CT Screening Detected Lung Cancer in Heavy Smokers
    Pastorino, Ugo
    Landoni, Claudio
    Marchiano, Alfonso
    Calabro, Elisa
    Sozzi, Gabriella
    Miceli, Rosalba
    Picchio, Maria
    Mariani, Luigi
    Messa, Cristina
    Fazio, Ferruccio
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4 (11) : 1352 - 1356
  • [35] Genomic characteristics of standardized uptake value of 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer
    Kim, S-K.
    Ahn, S. G.
    Leem, S-H.
    Jeong, J.
    Chu, I-S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [36] Value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography before radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: does the standardized uptake value predict treatment outcome?
    Suzuki, Keishiro
    Nishioka, Takeshi
    Homma, Akihiro
    Tsuchiya, Kazuhiko
    Yasuda, Motoaki
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Onimaru, Rikiya
    Tamaki, Nagara
    Shirato, Hiroki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 27 (06) : 237 - 242
  • [37] Biological Significance of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Values on Positron Emission Tomography in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Takenaka, Tomoyoshi
    Yano, Tokujiro
    Ito, Kensaku
    Morodomi, Yousuke
    Miura, Naoko
    Kawano, Daigo
    Shoji, Fumihiro
    Abe, Koichiro
    Honda, Hiroshi
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 100 (08) : 688 - 692
  • [38] Value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography before radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: does the standardized uptake value predict treatment outcome?
    Keishiro Suzuki
    Takeshi Nishioka
    Akihiro Homma
    Kazuhiko Tsuchiya
    Motoaki Yasuda
    Hidefumi Aoyama
    Rikiya Onimaru
    Nagara Tamaki
    Hiroki Shirato
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2009, 27 : 237 - 242
  • [39] The relationship between maximal standardized uptake value on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and clinical prognostic factors in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Nakamura, Y
    Watanabe, S
    Kariatumari, K
    Sakasegawa, K
    Fukumori, K
    Jinnouchi, S
    Sakata, R
    LUNG CANCER, 2005, 49 : S386 - S386
  • [40] Is there any maximum standardized uptake value variation among positron emission tomography scanners for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer?
    Iskender, Ilker
    Kadioglu, Salih Zeki
    Kosar, Altug
    Atasalihi, Ali
    Kir, Altan
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 12 (06) : 965 - 969