Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Ma, Chen-ying [1 ]
Zhou, Ju-ying [1 ]
Xu, Xiao-ting [1 ]
Qin, Song-bing [1 ]
Han, Miao-fei [2 ]
Cao, Xiao-huan [2 ]
Gao, Yao-zong [2 ]
Xu, Lu [2 ]
Zhou, Jing-jie [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [2 ]
Jia, Le-cheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, 188 Shizi St, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co Ltd, Jiading 201807, Peoples R China
[3] United Imaging Res Inst Innovat Med Equipment, Shenzhen 518045, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cervical cancer CTV; Deep learning; Auto-segmentation; Registration; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; IMAGE; VARIABILITY; DELINEATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-022-00851-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a key element of radiotherapy in cervical cancer. We validated a novel deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation algorithm for CTVs in cervical cancer called the three-channel adaptive auto-segmentation network (TCAS). Methods A total of 107 cases were collected and contoured by senior radiation oncologists (ROs). Each case consisted of the following: (1) contrast-enhanced CT scan for positioning, (2) the related CTV, (3) multiple plain CT scans during treatment and (4) the related CTV. After registration between (1) and (3) for the same patient, the aligned image and CTV were generated. Method 1 is rigid registration, method 2 is deformable registration, and the aligned CTV is seen as the result. Method 3 is rigid registration and TCAS, method 4 is deformable registration and TCAS, and the result is generated by a DL-based method. Results From the 107 cases, 15 pairs were selected as the test set. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of method 1 was 0.8155 +/- 0.0368; the DSC of method 2 was 0.8277 +/- 0.0315; the DSCs of method 3 and 4 were 0.8914 +/- 0.0294 and 0.8921 +/- 0.0231, respectively. The mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance of methods 3 and 4 were markedly better than those of method 1 and 2. Conclusions The TCAS achieved comparable accuracy to the manual delineation performed by senior ROs and was significantly better than direct registration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer
    Ahn, Sang Hee
    Yeo, Adam Unjin
    Kim, Kwang Hyeon
    Kim, Chankyu
    Goh, Youngmoon
    Cho, Shinhaeng
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Lim, Young Kyung
    Kim, Haksoo
    Shin, Dongho
    Kim, Taeyoon
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Youn, Sang Hee
    Oh, Eun Sang
    Jeong, Jong Hwi
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [32] Auditing the clinical usage of deep-learning based organ-at-risk auto-segmentation in radiotherapy
    Mason, Josh
    Doherty, Jack
    Robinson, Sarah
    de la Bastide, Meagan
    Miskell, Jack
    Mclauchlan, Ruth
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [33] Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer
    Sang Hee Ahn
    Adam Unjin Yeo
    Kwang Hyeon Kim
    Chankyu Kim
    Youngmoon Goh
    Shinhaeng Cho
    Se Byeong Lee
    Young Kyung Lim
    Haksoo Kim
    Dongho Shin
    Taeyoon Kim
    Tae Hyun Kim
    Sang Hee Youn
    Eun Sang Oh
    Jong Hwi Jeong
    Radiation Oncology, 14
  • [34] Deep Learning-based Auto-Segmentation for Pelvic Organs at Risk and Clinical Target Volumes in Intracavitary High Dose Rate Brachytherapy
    Wong, J.
    Kolbeck, C.
    Giambattista, J.
    Giambattista, J. A.
    Huang, V.
    Jaswal, J. K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E284 - E284
  • [35] A Deep Learning-Based Method with Prior Information for Auto-Delineation of Clinical Target Volume in Postmastectomy Radiotherapy
    Deng, X.
    Cai, W. P.
    Lin, F. Y.
    Jia, L. C.
    Dai, Z. J.
    Zhang, W.
    Li, J. N.
    Lei, R. H.
    Sun, H.
    Jiang, P.
    Wang, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E96 - E96
  • [36] Clinical evaluation of organs at risk deep learning auto-segmentation for cervix brachytherapy
    Keek, Simon A.
    Mans, Anton
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    Rijkmans, Eva E.
    Schaake, Eva C.
    Simoes, Rita
    Janssen, Tomas M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S333 - S336
  • [37] Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-segmentation for organs at risk delineation
    Yamauchi, Ryohei
    Itazawa, Tomoko
    Kobayashi, Takako
    Kashiyama, Shiho
    Akimoto, Hiroyoshi
    Mizuno, Norifumi
    Kawamori, Jiro
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 167 - 176
  • [38] Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
    Jordan Wong
    Vicky Huang
    Derek Wells
    Joshua Giambattista
    Jonathan Giambattista
    Carter Kolbeck
    Karl Otto
    Elantholi P. Saibishkumar
    Abraham Alexander
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [39] Implementation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy planning structures: a workflow study at two cancer centers
    Wong, Jordan
    Huang, Vicky
    Wells, Derek
    Giambattista, Joshua
    Giambattista, Jonathan
    Kolbeck, Carter
    Otto, Karl
    Saibishkumar, Elantholi P.
    Alexander, Abraham
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [40] Evaluation of deep learning-based target auto-segmentation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided cervix brachytherapy
    Simoes, Rita
    Rijkmans, Eva C.
    Schaake, Eva E.
    Nowee, Marlies E.
    van der Velden, Sandra
    Janssen, Tomas
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 32