Bilateral Single-session vs Staged Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones: A Comparative Study

被引:5
|
作者
ElSheemy, Mohammed S.
Ghoneima, Waleed
Elmarakbi, Akram A.
Al-Kandari, Ahmed M.
Ibrahim, Hamdy
Shrestha, Sunil
Khadgi, Sanjay
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Urol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Beni Suef Univ, Urol Dept, Bani Suwayf, Egypt
[3] Kuwait Univ, Kuwait, Kuwait
[4] Fayoum Univ, Urol Dept, Al Fayyum, Egypt
[5] Vayodha & Venus Int Hosp, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
COMPLICATION RATES; EFFICACY; SAFETY; FEASIBILITY; NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY; PREFERENCE; CALCULI; DISEASE; SUPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To compare safety and efficacy of bilateral single-session mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (BSS-Mini-PNL) vs staged-Mini-PNL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adult patients with bilateral renal stones indicated for PNL were managed with BSS-Mini-PNL (45 patients and 90 renal units) and prospectively compared vs staged-Mini-PNL (55 patients and 110 renal units) between July 2014 and December 2017. Mini-PNL was done through 18-Fr tract in prone position under regional anesthesia and fluoroscopy using pneumatic lithotripsy. A semirigid ureteroscope (8.5/11.5 Fr) was used. Mann-Whitney, Student t, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS Both groups were comparable in characteristics of stones and patients. Stone burden was 3.36 +/- 1.61 vs 3.38 +/- 1.18 cm(2) in BSS-Mini-PNL vs staged-Mini-PNL, respectively. Staghorn stones were present in 13.3% vs 8.2% in BSS-Mini-PNL vs staged-Mini-PNL, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of required tracts (1.34 +/- 0.6 vs 1.25 +/- 0.51 tract/renal unit) as well as the rate of tubeless Mini-PNL (81.1% vs 85.5%) or stone-free rate (90% vs 92.7%) in BSS-Mini-PNL vs staged-Mini-PNL, respectively. BSS-Mini-PNL had significantly shorter operative time (126.22 +/- 37.2 vs 169.63 +/- 61.28 minutes), shorter hospital stay (2 [1-8] vs 4 [2-16] days) and higher hemoglobin loss (1.1 [0.1-2.8] vs 0.5 [0.1-2.17] gm/d) than staged-Mini-PNL. The complications profile (17.8% vs 13.6%) and rate of blood transfusion (4.4% vs 3.6%) were comparable in BSS-Mini-PNL vs staged-Mini-PNL, respectively, without significant difference. CONCLUSION BSS-Mini-PNL is comparable to staged-PNL as regard stone-free rate and complications according to the selection criteria of the present study. However, BSS-Mini-PNL is associated with significant reduction in the cumulative operative time and hospital stay, which are reflected on the overall cost. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 67
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Guohua Zeng
    Jianye Jia
    Zhijian Zhao
    Wenqi Wu
    Zhigang Zhao
    Wen Zhong
    Urological Research, 2012, 40 : 599 - 603
  • [32] Correction: Safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of renal stones in pediatric age group
    Sarwar Noori Mahmood
    Shakhawan Hama Amin Said
    Rawa O. Mohammed
    Mzhda Sahib Jaafar
    BMC Nephrology, 26 (1)
  • [33] Tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for ≤2 cm renal stones: A prospective study
    Galeti, E. H.
    Pogula, V. R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1484 - S1484
  • [34] Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy
    Zeng, Guohua
    Jia, Jianye
    Zhao, Zhijian
    Wu, Wenqi
    Zhao, Zhigang
    Zhong, Wen
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (05): : 599 - 603
  • [35] Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With an Endoscopic Surgical Monitoring System for the Management of Renal Stones: A Retrospective Evaluation
    Gui, Huiming
    Wang, Hanzhang
    Kaushik, Dharam
    Rodriguez, Ronald
    Wang, Zhiping
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [36] Simultaneous Treatment of Renal Cysts and Stones with Single-Session Retroperitoneoscopic Renal Cyst Decortication and Retroperitoneoscopy-Assisted Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Qiu, Jianguang
    Wang, Dejuan
    Chen, Xihui
    Fang, Youqiang
    Lei, Hua
    Yan, Xiaoxu
    Gao, Xin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 88 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [37] Vacuum-assisted Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for 2-3-cm Renal Stones: A Comparative Study with Retrograde Intra-renal Surgery
    Collura, Giuseppe
    D'Ippolito, Giulia
    Mandes, Ana Ludy Lopes
    Innocenzi, Michele
    Del Prete, Laura
    Mele, Ermelinda
    Barneschi, Andrea Celeste
    Castagnetti, Marco
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2024, 59 (03) : 412 - 415
  • [38] Asymptomatic Giant Renal Calculi: Single-Session Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Images
    Bozkurt, Yunus Erol
    Temeltas, Gokhan
    Ucer, Oktay
    Muezzinoglu, Talha
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 85 (03) : 650 - 651
  • [39] Editorial Comment to Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
    Ishii, Keiichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 570 - 571
  • [40] Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones Larger Than 10 mm: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Jeong Woo
    Park, Juhyun
    Lee, Seung Bae
    Son, Hwancheol
    Cho, Sung Yong
    Jeong, Hyeon
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (05) : 873 - 877