Geospatial Multicriteria Analysis for Earthquake Risk Assessment: Case Study of Fujairah City in the UAE

被引:4
|
作者
Al-Dogom, Diena [1 ]
Al-Ruzouq, Rami [2 ]
Kalantar, Bahareh [3 ]
Schuckman, Karen [4 ]
Al-Mansoori, Saeed [5 ]
Mukherjee, Sunanda [2 ]
Al-Ahmad, Hussain [1 ]
Ueda, Naonori [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dubai, Coll Engn & Informat Technol, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Sharjah 27272, U Arab Emirates
[3] RIICEN Ctr Adv Intelligence Project, Goal Oriented Technol Res Grp, Disaster Resilience Sci Team, Tokyo 1030027, Japan
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Geog, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Mohammed Bin Rashid Space Ctr, Applicat Dev & Anal Ctr, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; GIS; DUBAI; BUILDINGS; ISTANBUL; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1155/2021/6638316
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A clear understanding of the spatial distribution of earthquake events facilitates the prediction of seismicity and vulnerability among researchers in the social, physical, environmental, and demographic aspects. Generally, there are few studies on seismic risk assessment in United Arab Emirates (UAE) within the geographic information system (GIS) platform. Former researches and recent news events have demonstrated that the eastern part of the country experiences jolts of 3-5 magnitude, specifically near Fujairah city and surrounding towns. This study builds on previous research on the seismic hazard that extracted the eastern part of the UAE as the most hazard-prone zone. Therefore, this study develops an integrated analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and machine learning (ML) for risk mapping considering eight geospatial parameters-distance from shoreline, schools, hospitals, roads, residences, streams, confined area, and confined area slope. Experts' opinions and literature reviews were the basis of the AHP ranking and weighting system. To validate the AHP system, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) classifiers were applied to the datasets. The datasets were split into 60 : 40 ratio for training and testing. Results show that SVM has the highest accuracy of 79.6% compared to DT and RF with a "predicted high" precision of 87.5% attained from the model. Risk maps from both AHP and ML approaches were developed and compared. Risk analysis was categorised into 5 classes "very high," "high," "moderate," "low," and "very low." Both approaches modelled relatable spatial patterns as risk-prone zones. AHP approach concluded 3.6% as "very high" risk zone, whereas only 0.3% of total area was identified from ML. The total area for the "very high" (20 km(2)) and "high" (114 km(2)) risk was estimated from ML approach.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hazard and risk assessment of earthquake-induced landslides—case study
    Julijana Bojadjieva
    Vlatko Sheshov
    Christophe Bonnard
    Landslides, 2018, 15 : 161 - 171
  • [32] Comparative analysis of the earthquake disaster risk of cities in Eastern China based on lethal levels - a case study of Yancheng City, Suqian City and Guangzhou City
    Xia Chaoxu
    Nie Gaozhong
    Li Huayue
    Fan Xiwei
    Yang Rui
    Zeng Xun
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 3224 - 3264
  • [33] Risk assessment of people trapped in earthquake disasters based on a single building: a case study in Xichang city, Sichuan Province, China
    Wei, Benyong
    Nie, Gaozhong
    Su, Guiwu
    Guo, Xinxin
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2022, 13 (01) : 167 - 192
  • [34] A GEOSPATIAL ASSESSMENT OF FLOOD RISK TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES USING MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS
    Kadapa, Haritha
    GEOGRAPHIA TECHNICA, 2025, 20 (01): : 281 - 297
  • [35] Introduce a framework for landslide risk assessment using geospatial analysis: a case study from Kegalle District, Sri Lanka
    E. N. C. Perera
    D. T. Jayawardana
    Manjula Ranagalage
    D M S L B Dissanayake
    H. M. D. S. Wijenayaka
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2020, 6 : 2415 - 2431
  • [36] Introduce a framework for landslide risk assessment using geospatial analysis: a case study from Kegalle District, Sri Lanka
    Perera, E. N. C.
    Jayawardana, D. T.
    Ranagalage, Manjula
    Dissanayake, D. M. S. L. B.
    Wijenayaka, H. M. D. S.
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6 (04) : 2415 - 2431
  • [37] Case study: Multicriteria assessment of drought mitigation measures
    Rossi, G
    Cancelliere, A
    Giuliano, G
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (06) : 449 - 457
  • [38] Vulnerability Assessment and Earthquake Risk Mapping in Part of North Iran Using Geospatial Techniques
    Mohammad Sharifikia
    Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2010, 38 : 708 - 716
  • [39] Vulnerability Assessment and Earthquake Risk Mapping in Part of North Iran Using Geospatial Techniques
    Sharifikia, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 (04) : 708 - 716
  • [40] Risk assessment study of fire following an earthquake: a case study of petrochemical enterprises in China
    Li, J.
    Wang, Y.
    Chen, H.
    Lin, L.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 14 (04) : 891 - 900