A non-invasive direct nose to brain drug delivery platform vs. invasive brain delivery approach: patient-centered care impact analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Kobo-Greenhut, Ayala [1 ,2 ]
Frankenthal, Hilel [2 ]
Darawsha, Aziz [3 ]
Karasik, Avraham [4 ]
Beja, Adit Zohar
Ben Hur, Tamir [5 ]
Ekstien, Dana [5 ]
Amir, Lisa [6 ]
Shahaf, Daniel [7 ]
Ben Shlomo, Izhar [2 ]
Shichor, Iris [7 ]
Frey, William H. [8 ]
机构
[1] Risk Management, Validat, Regulat, Haifa, Israel
[2] Zefat Acad Coll, Zefet, Israel
[3] Rambam Med Ctr, Emergency Dept, Haifa, Israel
[4] Sheba Med Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[5] Hadassah Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Jerusalem, Israel
[6] Schneider Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Petakh Tikva, Israel
[7] SipNose LTD, Yokneam Illit, Israel
[8] HealthPartners Neurosci Ctr, Ctr Memory & Aging, St Paul, MN USA
关键词
SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/10717544.2022.2080889
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Current literature lacks structured methodologies for analyzing medical technologies' impact from the patient-centered care perspective. This study introduces, applies and validates 'Patient-Centered Care Impact Analysis' (PCIA) as a method for identifying patient-centered care associated demands and expectations for a particular technology and assessing its compliance with these demands. PCIA involves five stages: (1) demand identification, (2) ranking demands' impact magnitude, (3) scoring demand compliance (DC), (4) demand priority (DP) assignment based on impact magnitude and compliance, (5) generating a summative impact priority number (IPN). PCIA was performed as a comparative assessment of two central nervous system (CNS) drug-delivery platforms; SipNose, a novel noninvasive Direct-Nose-to-Brain (DNTB), vs. the standard-of-care invasive intrathecal/intracerebroventricular injection (Invasive I/I). Study participants included a ranking team (RT) without experience with the SipNose technology that based their scoring on experimental data; and a validation team (VT) experienced with the SipNose platform. All had experience with, or knowledge of, InvasiveI/I. Demand identification and impact magnitude were performed by one content and one assessment expert. Each participant assessed each technology's DC. DP scores, IPN's and IPN DNTB:InvasiveI/I ratios were generated for each technology, for each team, based on DC and summative DP scores, respectively. Both teams assigned DNTB higher DC scores, resulting in higher DNTB DP, IPN scores and DNTB:InvasiveI/I IPN ratios. Lack of difference between team assessments of DP and IPN ratio validate PCIA as an assessment tool capable of predicting patient-centered clinical care quality for a new technology. The significant differences between the platforms highlight SipNose's patient-care centered advantages as an effective CNS drug-delivery platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1754 / 1763
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In Vivo Wireless Brain Stimulation via Non-invasive and Targeted Delivery of Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles
    Nguyen, Tyler
    Gao, Jianhua
    Wang, Ping
    Nagesetti, Abhignyan
    Andrews, Peter
    Masood, Sehban
    Vriesman, Zoe
    Liang, Ping
    Khizroev, Sakhrat
    Jin, Xiaoming
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 18 (03) : 2091 - 2106
  • [22] Non-invasive PTEN mRNA brain delivery effectively mitigates growth of orthotopic glioblastoma
    Liu, Yanjie
    Zhang, Dongya
    An, Yang
    Sun, Yajing
    Li, Jia
    Zheng, Meng
    Zou, Yan
    Shi, Bingyang
    NANO TODAY, 2023, 49
  • [23] In Vivo Wireless Brain Stimulation via Non-invasive and Targeted Delivery of Magnetoelectric Nanoparticles
    Tyler Nguyen
    Jianhua Gao
    Ping Wang
    Abhignyan Nagesetti
    Peter Andrews
    Sehban Masood
    Zoe Vriesman
    Ping Liang
    Sakhrat Khizroev
    Xiaoming Jin
    Neurotherapeutics, 2021, 18 : 2091 - 2106
  • [24] Nose-to-brain delivery of hyaluronate - FG loop peptide conjugate for non-invasive hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy therapy
    Kim, Yun Seop
    Sung, Dong Kyung
    Kim, Hyemin
    Kong, Won Ho
    Kim, Young Eun
    Hahn, Sei Kwang
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2019, 307 : 76 - 89
  • [25] Goal Selection vs. Process Control in Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface
    Royer, Audrey S.
    Rose, Minn L.
    He, Bin
    2011 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2011, : 4235 - 4238
  • [26] Direct nose to brain drug delivery via integrated nerve pathways bypassing the blood-brain barrier: an excellent platform for brain targeting
    Pardeshi, Chandrakantsing Vijaysing
    Belgamwar, Veena Shailendra
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2013, 10 (07) : 957 - 972
  • [27] Non-invasive gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier: present and future perspectives
    Kimura, Seigo
    Harashima, Hideyoshi
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (04) : 785 - 787
  • [28] Non-invasive gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier: present and future perspectives
    Seigo Kimura
    Hideyoshi Harashima
    NeuralRegenerationResearch, 2022, 17 (04) : 785 - 787
  • [29] Development of a brain computer interface for delivery of non-invasive brain stimulation during visuomotor task performance - a method study
    Foerster, Aguida
    Jacob, Athira
    Dutta, Anirban
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER), 2015, : 178 - 181
  • [30] Is non-invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure waveform analysis possible? Preliminary results of a comparative study of non-invasive vs. invasive intracranial slow-wave waveform analysis monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury
    Fountas, KN
    Sitkauskas, A
    Feltes, CH
    Kapsalaki, EZ
    Dimopoulos, VG
    Kassam, M
    Grigorian, AA
    Robinson, JS
    Ragauskas, A
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2005, 11 (02): : CR58 - CR63