Sibyl: Explaining Machine Learning Models for High-Stakes Decision Making

被引:3
|
作者
Zytek, Alexandra [1 ]
Liu, Dongyu [1 ]
Vaithianathan, Rhema [2 ]
Veeramachaneni, Kalyan [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
machine learning; interpretability; explainability; child welfare; social good; tool;
D O I
10.1145/3411763.3451743
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As machine learning is applied to an increasingly large number of domains, the need for an effective way to explain its predictions grows apace. In the domain of child welfare screening, machine learning offers a promising method of consolidating the large amount of data that screeners must look at, potentially improving the outcomes for children reported to child welfare departments. Interviews and case-studies suggest that adding an explanation alongside the model prediction may result in better outcomes, but it is not obvious what kind of explanation would be most useful in this context. Through a series of interviews and user studies, we developed Sibyl, a machine learning explanation dashboard specifically designed to aid child welfare screeners' decision making. When testing Sibyl, we evaluated four different explanation types, and based on this evaluation, decided a local feature contribution approach was most useful to screeners.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Educators as Judges: Applying Judicial Decision-Making Principles to High-Stakes Education Assessment Decisions
    Hu, Wendy C. Y.
    Dillon, Hugh C. B.
    Wilkinson, Tim J.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 35 (02) : 168 - 179
  • [32] Elevating humanism in high-stakes automation: experts-in-the-loop and resort-to-force decision making
    Davis, Jenny L.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2024, 78 (02) : 200 - 209
  • [33] Curriculum making as novice professional development - Practical risk taking as learning in high-stakes times
    Clayton, Christine D.
    JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2007, 58 (03) : 216 - 230
  • [34] Early prediction of medical students' performance in high-stakes examinations using machine learning approaches
    Mastour, Haniye
    Dehghani, Toktam
    Moradi, Ehsan
    Eslami, Saeid
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (07)
  • [35] Causal Artificial Intelligence for High-Stakes Decisions: The Design and Development of a Causal Machine Learning Model
    Sahoh, Bukhoree
    Haruehansapong, Kanjana
    Kliangkhlao, Mallika
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 (24327-24339): : 24327 - 24339
  • [36] Can lies be faked? Comparing low-stakes and high-stakes deception video datasets from a Machine Learning perspective
    Camara, Mateus Karvat
    Postal, Adriana
    Maul, Tomas Henrique
    Paetzold, Gustavo Henrique
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 249
  • [37] Decision Heuristics and Descriptive Choice Models for Sequential High-Stakes Risky Choices in the Deal or No Deal Game
    Chen, Zhiqin
    John, Richard S.
    DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2021, 8 (03): : 155 - 179
  • [38] Interpretable high-stakes decision support system for credit default forecasting
    Sun, Weixin
    Zhang, Xuantao
    Li, Minghao
    Wang, Yong
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 196
  • [39] High-Stakes Decision-Making by Female Crickets (Gryllus texensis): When to Trade In Wing Muscles for Eggs*
    Miyashita, Atsushi
    Lee, Ting Yat Marco
    Adamo, Shelley A.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY, 2020, 93 (06): : 450 - 465
  • [40] Algorithmic Risk Assessments Can Alter Human Decision-Making Processes in High-Stakes Government Contexts
    Green B.
    Chen Y.
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 5 (CSCW2)