Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study

被引:7
|
作者
Walker, Marion F. [1 ]
Birchall, Sheila [1 ]
Cobley, Christine [2 ]
Condon, Laura [1 ]
Fisher, Rebecca [1 ]
Fletcher-Smith, Joanna [1 ]
Golding-Day, Miriam R. [1 ]
Greensmith, Christopher [3 ]
Kontou, Eirini [1 ]
Matias, Oliver [4 ]
Sprigg, Nikola [4 ]
Thomas, Shirley A. [1 ]
Whitehead, Phillip J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Rehabil Ageing & Wellbeing, Nottingham, England
[2] Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Clin Psychol, Derby, England
[3] Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, IAPT Serv, Nottingham, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Div Clin Neurosci, Nottingham, England
[5] Northumbria Univ, Dept Social Work Educ & Community Wellbeing, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Stroke; carers; biopsychosocial; complex intervention; randomised controlled trial; REHABILITATION; CAREGIVERS; SURVIVORS; RECOVERY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/0269215520937039
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. Design: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. Setting: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. Subjects: Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. Interventions: A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. Main Outcome: Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). Results: Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs.
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1281
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a Fibromyalgia Self-management Programme for adults in a community setting with a nested qualitative study (FALCON)
    Jennifer Pearson
    Jessica Coggins
    Sandi Derham
    Julie Russell
    Nicola E. Walsh
    Erik Lenguerrand
    Shea Palmer
    Fiona Cramp
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [22] A family support organiser for stroke patients and their carers: A randomised controlled trial
    Tilling, K
    Coshall, C
    McKevitt, C
    Daneski, K
    Wolfe, C
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2005, 20 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [23] Randomised controlled trial of an education and support package for stroke patients and their carers
    Eames, Sally
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Worrall, Linda
    Read, Stephen
    Wong, Andrew
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (05):
  • [24] A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a Fibromyalgia Self-management Programme for adults in a community setting with a nested qualitative study (FALCON)
    Pearson, Jennifer
    Coggins, Jessica
    Derham, Sandi
    Russell, Julie
    Walsh, Nicola E.
    Lenguerrand, Erik
    Palmer, Shea
    Cramp, Fiona
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [25] Adaptation and feasibility of START online, a multicomponent intervention for Australian carers of people with dementia: a pilot randomised controlled trial
    Kelly, Michelle
    Kilham, Kaylene
    Walter, Alison
    Bell-Weinberg, Karen
    Livingston, Gill
    Dow, Briony
    BRAIN IMPAIRMENT, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [26] Results of the HOme VIsit after Stroke (HOVIS) feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT)
    Sprigg, N.
    Drummond, A. E. R.
    Whitehead, P. J.
    Fellows, K. R.
    Sampson, C. J.
    Edwards, C.
    Lincoln, N.
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 35 : 784 - 784
  • [27] 'Well London' and the benefits of participation: results of a qualitative study nested in a cluster randomised trial
    Derges, Jane
    Clow, Angela
    Lynch, Rebecca
    Jain, Sumeet
    Phillips, Gemma
    Petticrew, Mark
    Renton, Adrian
    Draper, Alizon
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (04):
  • [28] Women's experiences of a randomised controlled trial of a specialist psychological advocacy intervention following domestic violence: A nested qualitative study
    Evans, Maggie
    Malpass, Alice
    Agnew-Davies, Roxane
    Feder, Gene
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [29] Snacktivity™ to promote physical activity and reduce future risk of disease in the population: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative study
    Daley, Amanda J.
    Griffin, Ryan A.
    Moakes, Catherine A.
    Sanders, James P.
    Skrybant, Magdalena
    Ives, Natalie
    Maylor, Ben
    Greenfield, Sheila M.
    Gokal, Kajal
    Parretti, Helen M.
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Greaves, Colin
    Maddison, Ralph
    Mutrie, Nanette
    Esliger, Dale W.
    Sherar, Lauren
    Edwardson, Charlotte L.
    Yates, Tom
    Frew, Emma
    Tearne, Sarah
    Jolly, Kate
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [30] Snacktivity™ to promote physical activity and reduce future risk of disease in the population: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative study
    Amanda J. Daley
    Ryan A. Griffin
    Catherine A. Moakes
    James P. Sanders
    Magdalena Skrybant
    Natalie Ives
    Ben Maylor
    Sheila M. Greenfield
    Kajal Gokal
    Helen M. Parretti
    Stuart J. H. Biddle
    Colin Greaves
    Ralph Maddison
    Nanette Mutrie
    Dale W. Esliger
    Lauren Sherar
    Charlotte L. Edwardson
    Tom Yates
    Emma Frew
    Sarah Tearne
    Kate Jolly
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9