The effect of carbon emission trading scheme on energy efficiency: Evidence from China

被引:41
|
作者
Tan, Xiujie [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yishuang [3 ,6 ]
Dong, Hanmin [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Zhan [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Inst Int Studies, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Climate Change & Energy Econ Study Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission trading scheme; Energy efficiency; Green recovery; Sustainable development; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; MARKET; INNOVATION; IMPACT; COSTS; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2022.06.012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global economic recession and even changed its development pattern. Improving energy efficiency has become one of the best choices worldwide to achieve green recovery in the post-COVID-19 era. Therefore, this study explores the effect of carbon emission trading scheme (ETS) pilots on energy efficiency by the difference-in-differences (DID) model, using panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2009 to 2020. The following results are obtained: (1) Carbon ETS pilots could significantly increase energy efficiency by an overall effect of 1.82%, among which technical efficiency might be improved more obviously than others; (2) The average effect of carbon ETS pilots may differ between provinces because of some economic regional factors, being more significant in regions with a large number of employees and high wages; (3) This positive effect is transferred through industrial structure and R & D investment.(c) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 517
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research on the impact and intermediary effect of carbon emission trading policy on carbon emission efficiency in China
    Hou, Jian
    Shi, Chengxi
    Fan, Guoliang
    Xu, Hongxia
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (04)
  • [22] Political uncertainty and carbon emission trading: Evidence from China
    Tang, Tony He
    Bao, Helen X. H.
    CITIES, 2024, 145
  • [23] Carbon Emission Trading and Corporate Financing: Evidence from China
    Meng, Li
    Wang, Ke
    Su, Taoyong
    He, He
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (14)
  • [24] Does carbon emission trading scheme really improve the CO2 emission efficiency? Evidence from China's iron and steel industry
    Wu, Rongxin
    Tan, Zhizhou
    Lin, Boqiang
    ENERGY, 2023, 277
  • [25] Does the coexistence of carbon emission trading and energy efficiency trading make sense? The case of China
    Li, Jia-lin
    Chi, Yuan-ying
    Li, Yuan
    Pang, Yuexia
    Jin, Feng
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 710 - 721
  • [26] The spatial spillover effect of China's pollutants emission trading pilot scheme on green efficiency: evidence from 285 China's cities
    Wang, Kaifeng
    Zhong, Chunping
    Chen, Lifeng
    Zeng, Yunmin
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (08) : 8137 - 8163
  • [27] The spatial spillover effect of China’s pollutants emission trading pilot scheme on green efficiency: evidence from 285 China’s cities
    Kaifeng Wang
    Chunping Zhong
    Lifeng Chen
    Yunmin Zeng
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 8137 - 8163
  • [28] Does China's regional emission trading scheme lead to carbon leakage? Evidence from conglomerates
    He, Ling-Yun
    Chen, Kun-Xian
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 175
  • [29] Will carbon emission trading scheme affect industrial investment? Evidence from China's listed companies
    Zheng, Haotian
    Zhang, Caiyun
    Zhang, Xiaoxi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [30] The impact of carbon emission trading scheme policy on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from China
    Yuan, Xue
    Dong, Yu
    Liang, Liang
    Wei, Yuting
    ENERGY POLICY, 2025, 198