Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China

被引:116
|
作者
Zhang, Weike [1 ]
Luo, Qian [1 ]
Liu, Shiyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Sch Econ, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Government regulation; Corporate environmental performance (CEP); New Ambient Air Quality Standard (new AAQS); DID; AIR-QUALITY; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; GREEN INNOVATION; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENFORCEMENT; IMPACT; UNCERTAINTY; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2022.01.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Due to the severe air pollution, the Chinese state issued the new Ambient Air Quality Standard (hereafter new AAQS) in 2012, which requires local governments to control pollution and improve air quality. As such, we take that practice as a quasi-natural experiment to examine the effect of government regulation on corporate environmental performance (CEP). We employ the difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct an empirical investigation using Chinese listed enterprises' data from 2008 to 2018. Our findings indicate that the new AAQS significantly promotes the improvement of CEP. However, for enterprises in provinces with less environmental regulatory enforcement and poor environmental information transparency, this effect is weakened. Besides, the influence of the new AAQS reduces when the enterprises are regulated by the government at a greater administrative hierarchical distance to the central state. Our findings offer some critical implications for developing countries to implement government regulation. (C) 2022 Economic Society of Australia, Queensland. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 121
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China
    Zhu, Danyu
    Gao, Xin
    Luo, Zijun
    Xu, Weidong
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 74
  • [22] Climate risk and corporate environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China
    Ren, Xiaohang
    Li, Yiying
    Shahbaz, Muhammad
    Dong, Kangyin
    Lu, Zudi
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 30 : 467 - 477
  • [23] Do Auditors Applaud Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from China
    Xingqiang Du
    Wei Jian
    Quan Zeng
    Yingying Chang
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 : 1049 - 1080
  • [24] Retail investor attention and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from china
    Ming, Yaxin
    Li, Yubo
    Liu, Nian
    Li, Jing
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 56
  • [25] Social Insurance Burden and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China
    Wang, Nai-Chun
    Si, Deng-Kui
    Dong, Chun-Feng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [26] Do Auditors Applaud Corporate Environmental Performance? Evidence from China
    Du, Xingqiang
    Jian, Wei
    Zeng, Quan
    Chang, Yingying
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 151 (04) : 1049 - 1080
  • [27] Can the government environmental audits improve corporate green investment? Evidence from China
    Sun, Lipeng
    Luo, Kaikai
    Zhou, Chaobo
    Yan, Jiale
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 97
  • [28] How environmental regulation affect corporate green investment: Evidence from China
    Huang, Lingyun
    Lei, Zhuojun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [29] Financialization, Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation, and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Ke, Di
    Li, Guodong
    Tsai, Sang-bing
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (03): : 2739 - 2760
  • [30] Corporate earnings management strategy under environmental regulation: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Jintao
    Su, Taoyong
    Meng, Li
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 90 : 154 - 166