Time required for specific immunotherapy with subcutaneous and sublingual administration in clinical practice

被引:2
|
作者
Peter, R. U. [1 ]
Weimer, M. [1 ]
Goertzen, W. [2 ]
Holdt, C. [3 ]
Schreder, C. H.
机构
[1] Gefass & Hautzentrum Blaustein Ulm, Munich, Germany
[2] Hochstadt, Munich, Germany
[3] Schmiedl Marktforsch GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
specific immunotherapy; sublingual immunotherapy; subcutaneous immunotherapy; expenditure of time;
D O I
10.5414/ALX01497
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Time required for specific immunotherapy with subcutaneous and sublingual administration in clinical practice Background: Available therapeutic options for specific immunotherapy (SIT) include products for subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) administration. Their efficacy and tolerability have been studied in clinical trials, and they can be used in accordance with the German S2 guidelines on SIT. To date, little is known about the time it takes to carry out SCIT or SLIT in the clinical practice of non-hospital-based specialists per patient and year. Amongst other things, such figures are, however, important for economic calculations. Methods: Data were collected from 545 patients (SCIT: n = 274; SLIT: n = 271) in 52 allergology practices. Each individual step of patient management was timed, with a stopwatch whenever possible, and the times recorded in a standardised case report form. Results: Each year, on average, SLIT required 1.22 hours per patient, while the figure for SCIT was 6.03 hours per patient. The time involved in the initial stages was longer for SLIT than SCIT. Writing purchasing orders and prescriptions took about the same amount of time (about three minutes) for the two routes of administration. The difference between the overall times arose because almost twice as many visits to the doctor were required for SCIT than for SLIT (8 to 9 vs. 4 to 5), in addition to the time taken to prepare and administer the injections and the subsequent 30-minute waiting time. Conclusions: The difference between SCIT and SLIT in the time required is 4.81 hours on average in favour of SLIT. Given the fact that products for evidence-based treatment are available in equal measure for both SLIT and SCIT, the time factor involved in the two administration routes should also be included in therapeutic considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:S5 / S8
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of patients for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) versus subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)
    Tabatabaian, Farnaz
    Casale, Thomas B.
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 36 (02) : 100 - 104
  • [42] Grass pollen SIT in daily medical practice - effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy is comparable with subcutaneous treatment
    Sieber, J.
    Shah-Hosseini, K.
    Moesges, R.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 : 347 - 347
  • [43] Preseasonal sublingual (SLIT) in comparison to subcutaneous preseasonal Immunotherapy (SCIT) Experience from a Pediatric practice
    Sander, H.
    ALLERGOLOGIE, 2012, 35 (05) : 265 - 265
  • [44] Clinical efficacy evaluation of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in patients monosensitised to house dust mites
    Yildirim, O.
    Coskun, B. U.
    Ucal, Y. O.
    Ucak, I
    Tetik, F.
    ALLERGY, 2013, 68 : 479 - 480
  • [45] Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy: methodological approaches and experimental results
    Malling, Hans-Jorgen
    CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 4 (06) : 539 - 542
  • [46] Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy versus Subcutaneous Injection Immunotherapy in Allergic Patients
    Saporta, Diego
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 2012
  • [47] Modelling the Costs of Sublingual Immunotherapy versus Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Based on Clinical Appointments and Impacts of Patient Travel in Sweden
    Cardell, Lars-Olaf
    Sterner, Thomas
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Slaettanes, Andreas Kallsoy
    Svard, Mikael
    Pollock, Richard F.
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 16 : 493 - 506
  • [48] Clinical Applications of Sublingual Immunotherapy
    Edwards, Thomas S.
    Wise, Sarah K.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 50 (06) : 1121 - +
  • [49] Basic science for the clinician: Mechanisms of sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy
    Lawrence, Monica G.
    Steinke, John W.
    Borish, Larry
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 117 (02) : 138 - 142
  • [50] Sublingual Immunotherapy works differently than Subcutaneous Therapy
    不详
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (04) : 248 - 248