Forage management practices used in production of US grass-fed beef

被引:3
|
作者
Sitienei, I [1 ]
Gillespie, J. [2 ]
Scaglia, G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Austin Peay State Univ, Dept Agr, 601 Coll St, Clarksville, TN 37044 USA
[2] Econ Res Serv, USDA, 355 E St SW, Washington, DC 20024 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Iberia Res Stn, 603 LSU Bridge Rd, Jeanerette, LA 70544 USA
来源
APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2019年 / 35卷 / 06期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
beef cattle; grasses; grazing management; legumes;
D O I
10.15232/aas.2019-01890
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Objective: Management of forage resources is critical to ensuring animals destined for the grass-fed beef (GFB) market have access to quality forage needed for growth and development for acceptable meat products. The objective of this study was to evaluate the forage management systems and species used by US GFB producers, adoption rates of rotational grazing systems, producers' perceptions of the profitability associated with rotational grazing systems, and the economic effect of intensive grazing systems on GFB production costs and profitability. Materials and Methods: A survey questionnaire was mailed to 1,052 US GFB producers to examine forage management systems used in US CUB production. A total of 384 completed questionnaires were received. An ordered probit model was used to determine the types of farms and demographics of producers more likely to be involved in an intensive rotational grazing system. Results and Discussion: A total of 59 different forage species and types were listed in the study. In all US regions represented in the study, the average and median farm reported use of 3 to 4 forage species or types in their systems. More than half of the respondents indicated rotational grazing increased farm profit by greater than 20% relative to continuous grazing. Implications and Applications: The level of rotational grazing differed by region with producers in the Pacific region rotating the least relative to others. Producer demographics and farm size also significantly affected the frequency of rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 542
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FLORIDA MEETING EXAMINES FUTURE OF GRASS-FED BEEF
    BROWN, RH
    FEEDSTUFFS, 1975, 47 (20): : 27 - 27
  • [22] More than grass: Organizing the emerging grass-fed beef market
    Gwin, L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 : 166 - 166
  • [23] GRASS-FED, SHORT-FED AND LONG-FED BEEF COMPARED
    KROPF, DH
    ALLEN, DM
    THOUVENELLE, GJ
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1975, 41 (01) : 295 - 295
  • [24] The perfect beef? Ethical aspects of grass-fed beef of high meat quality
    Karlsson, A. H.
    Rocklinsberg, H.
    SUSTAINABLE GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF FOOD SYSTEMS: ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2019, : 338 - 342
  • [25] Estimating Preference Heterogeneity for Grass-fed Beef Cattle Traits
    Sitienei, Isaac
    Gillespie, Jeffrey
    Harrison, Robert W.
    Scaglia, Guillermo
    AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2020, 49 (03) : 492 - 516
  • [26] Analysis of preference for domestic grass-fed beef in Japanese youths
    Orime, Ai
    Yonezawa, Tomohiro
    Ogasawara, Hideki
    Kuroyanagi, Tadashi
    Manda, Tomiharu
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2012, 83 (03) : 268 - 271
  • [27] Nutritional Benefits from Fatty Acids in Organic and Grass-Fed Beef
    Davis, Hannah
    Magistrali, Amelia
    Butler, Gillian
    Stergiadis, Sokratis
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [28] Authentication of grass-fed beef using bovine muscle, hair or urine
    Monahan, F. J.
    Moloney, A. P.
    Osorio, M. T.
    Roehrle, F. T.
    Schmidt, O.
    Brennan, L.
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 28 (02) : 69 - 76
  • [29] Permanent pastures and industry policy guide certified grass-fed beef
    Maudsley, Grant
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 2009, 43 : 207 - 210
  • [30] Ruminal Transcriptomic Analysis of Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Angus Beef Cattle
    Li, Yaokun
    Carrillo, Jose A.
    Ding, Yi
    He, YangHua
    Zhao, Chunping
    Zan, Linsen
    Song, Jiuzhou
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):