Assessment and improvement of liver specific function of the AMC-bioartificial liver

被引:28
|
作者
van de Kerkhove, MP [1 ]
Poyck, PPC
Van Wijk, ACWA
Galavotti, D
Hoekstra, R
Van Gulik, TM
Chamuleau, RAFM
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Surg Lab, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, AMC Liver Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Hepatol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] RanD Srl, Modena, Italy
来源
关键词
liver failure; bioartificial liver; porcine; hepatocyte; function; bioactive mass;
D O I
10.1177/039139880502800611
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The variety of methods for measuring bioactive mass and functionality of bioartificial livers (BAL) is confusing and prevents accurate comparison of reported data. Here we present a comparison of different hepatocyte quantification methods and propose that estimation of cell pellet volume after centrifugation generates a reliable, useful and fast method. In addition a correlation is made between several function tests performed in 26 bioreactors to assess their predictive value. The ammonia eliminating capacity was found to be most predictive for other liver functions, except for lidocaine elimination as a measure of mixed function oxidase activity, which should therefore be determined separately. The oxygen consumption test proved to be an easy and predictive parameter as well. The first generation of our BAL system needed further development to assure optimal treatment of acute liver failure (ALF) patients. Changes in the porcine hepatocyte isolation method and bioreactor loading as well as changes in bioreactor configuration, including use of different materials, resulted in a significantly improved level and maintenance of in vitro BAL function. A fourfold increase in ammonia eliminating capacity, which is only reduced to 75% after seven days of culturing, offers promising prospects for further clinical application. Conclusion: The current second generation of our BAL and improvement of hepatocyte isolation and testing protocols have led to a significant increase in the level as well as the maintenance of hepatocyte specific function in our BAL. Finally, consensus on definition of the bioactive mass to be loaded in the bioreactor and insight in the variation and reliability of the functional and metabolic parameters enhances comparison of the different types of bioartificial livers presented in literature.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 630
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bioartificial liver
    Demetriou, Achilles A.
    XENOTRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 14 (05) : 427 - 427
  • [22] Perfusion flow rate substantially contributes to the performance of the HepaRG-AMC-bioartificial liver
    Nibourg, Geert A. A.
    Boer, Justin D.
    van der Hoeven, Tessa V.
    Ackermans, Mariette T.
    van Gulik, Thomas M.
    Chamuleau, Robert A. F. M.
    Hoekstra, Ruurdtje
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2012, 109 (12) : 3182 - 3188
  • [23] Mild hypothermic preservation for transport purposes of the AMC bioartificial liver charged with porcine hepatocytes
    Poyck, PPC
    Hoekstra, R
    van Wijk, ACWA
    ten Bloemendaal, L
    Chamuleau, RAFM
    van Gulik, TM
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 80 (09) : 1153 - 1160
  • [24] Function of a new internal bioartificial liver: An in vitro study
    Xu, QX
    Yu, DC
    Qiu, YD
    Zhang, HY
    Ding, YT
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, 2003, 33 (03): : 306 - 312
  • [25] Hepatocyte function during experimental use of a bioartificial liver
    Papadimitriou, D
    Arkadopoulos, N
    Kouskouni, E
    Tsarouxa, N
    Demesticha, T
    Kousi, T
    Drakopoulou, M
    Mitrou, S
    Vassileiou, J
    Katsorhis, T
    Patargias, T
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (06) : 1741 - 1743
  • [26] In vitro comparison of two bioartificial liver support systems:: MELS CellModule and AMC-BAL
    Poyck, P. P. C.
    Pless, G.
    Hoekstra, R.
    Roth, S.
    Van Wijk, A. C. W. A.
    Schwartlander, R.
    Van Gulik, T. M.
    Sauer, I. M.
    Chamuleau, R. A. F. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2007, 30 (03): : 183 - 191
  • [27] In vitro comparison of two bioartificial liver support systems: MELS CellModule and AMC-BAL
    Poyck, P.P.C.
    Pless, G.
    Hoekstra, R.
    Roth, S.
    Van Wijk, A.C.W.A.
    Schwartländer, R.
    Van Gulik, T.M.
    Sauer, I.M.
    Chamuleau, R.A.F.M.
    International Journal of Artificial Organs, 2007, 30 (03): : 183 - 191
  • [28] Bioartificial liver support
    Bain, VG
    Montero, JL
    de la Mata, M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05): : 313 - 318
  • [29] Neurological improvement during bioartificial liver sessions in patients with acute liver failure awaiting transplantation
    Samuel, D
    Ichai, P
    Feray, C
    Saliba, F
    Azoulay, D
    Arulnaden, JL
    Debat, P
    Gigou, M
    Adam, R
    Bismuth, A
    Castaing, D
    Bismuth, H
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (02) : 257 - 264
  • [30] The Amsterdam bioartificial liver
    Chamuleau, RAFM
    ARTIFICIAL LIVER SUPPORT, 2006, 145 : 61 - 71