Accuracy of a patient-specific template for pedicle screw placement compared with a conventional method: a meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Fan, Yong [1 ]
Du, Jin-Peng [1 ]
Wu, Qi-Ning [1 ]
Zhang, Jia-Nan [1 ]
Hao, Ding-Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Honghui Hosp, Dept Spine Surg, Friendship East Rd, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Patient-specific template; Free hand; Accuracy; Pedicle screw; DRILL GUIDE TEMPLATE; ASSISTED ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; INDIVIDUAL TEMPLATES; CLINICAL ARTICLE; SPINE; NAVIGATION; OPERATION; SCOLIOSIS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-017-2815-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate placement of pedicle screws in spine surgery is a challenge for surgeons. Patient-specific template techniques have the potential for improving the accuracy of screw placement. The target of this analysis was to investigate differences in terms of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion between patient-specific template assistance and the conventional free-hand method for reconstruction of spinal stability. The Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and CNKI database were searched until February 2017 for a systematic review, and several comparative studies were screened for comparisons of accuracies of pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific assistance and conventional methods. Primary outcomes extracted from papers that met the selection criterion were expressed as odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval. A chi (2) test and I (2) statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. A total of ten RCTs and two prospective cohort studies were finally chosen for the analysis of accuracy rates. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. There were obvious differences between them, and the accuracy rate of screw implantation among a patient-specific template assistance set was statistically significantly higher than the conventional free-hand set (OR 95% CI 3.78-6.41, P < 0.01); in vitro: OR 95% CI 3.93-7.42, P < 0.01; in vivo: OR 95% CI 2.49-6.44, P < 0.01. The template-assisted technique is superior to the conventional method for the reduction of pedicle violation. The template-assisted technique is a promising technique that should be considered as another available navigation tool for surgeons to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. As an available technique for emerging applications in spine surgeries, this technique will face challenges but ultimately prove successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:1641 / 1649
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parisa Azimi
    Taravat Yazdanian
    Edward C. Benzel
    Hossein Nayeb Aghaei
    Shirzad Azhari
    Sohrab Sadeghi
    Ali Montazeri
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [22] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Spine with Conventional Open Technique
    Borcek, Alp Ozgun
    Suner, Halil Ibrahim
    Emmez, Hakan
    Kaymaz, Memduh
    Aykol, Sukru
    Pasaoglu, Aydin
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 24 (03) : 398 - 402
  • [23] Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study
    Farshad, Mazda
    Betz, Michael
    Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
    Moser, Manuel
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (03) : 738 - 749
  • [24] Accuracy of Patient-Specific Template-Guided Versus Freehand Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement from C2 to C7: A Randomized Cadaveric Study
    Moser, Manuel
    Farshad, Mazda
    Farshad-Amacker, Nadja A.
    Betz, Michael
    Spirig, Jose Miguel
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 126 : E803 - E813
  • [25] Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study
    Mazda Farshad
    Michael Betz
    Nadja A. Farshad-Amacker
    Manuel Moser
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 738 - 749
  • [26] Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis
    Nai-Feng Tian
    Hua-Zi Xu
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 895 - 903
  • [27] Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (04) : 895 - 903
  • [28] Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrumentation Compared With Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Jiang, Jin
    Kang, Xin
    Lin, Qiao
    Teng, Yuanjun
    An, Liping
    Ma, Jingling
    Wang, Jing
    Xia, Yayi
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (04) : E305 - E313
  • [29] Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Nida
    Massaad, Elie
    Hadzipasic, Muhamed
    Shankar, Ganesh M.
    Shin, John H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02): : 181 - 192
  • [30] Pedicle screw placement safety with the aid of patient-specific guides in a case series of patients with thoracic scoliosis
    Mohar, Janez
    Valic, Matej
    Podovsovnik, Eva
    Mihalic, Rene
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (12) : 3544 - 3550