Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography: diagnostic performance and effect on recall rates versus digital mammography in category O

被引:0
|
作者
Emlik, Ganime Dilek [1 ]
Poyraz, Necdet [1 ]
Altunkeser, Aysegul [2 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
[2] Konya Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Konya, Turkey
关键词
Screening mammography; digital breast tomosynthesis; ultrasonography; diagnostic performance; recall rates; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; DENSE BREASTS; CANCER; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic performance and screening recall rates of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound (US) added to digital mammography (DM) in the category O. This study was approved by the local ethics committee and informed consent was obtained. The additional breast US and DBT performed 216 women categorized as BI-RADS category O according to screening DM between January 2014 and February 2015. A total of 22 women that previously underwent breast surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy were excluded. Finally 194 patients were enrolled in this study. The DM+DBT images and DM+DBT images with US images of patients were independently reviewed by three breast radiologists and than recategorized according to BI-RADS category. Among 194 lesions, 165 (85%) were benign and 29 (14.9%) were malign. DBT reduced recall rate by 70%. For DBT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, 48%, 99%, and 84%, whereas for US sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 93%, 79%, 47%, 98%, and 81%, respectively. AUC value was 0.89 and 0.86 for DBT and US. In conclusion, DBT reduced recall rates. DBT showed better diagnostic performance than breast US for category O. Reduction in RR was independent from breast parenchymal patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:10668 / 10675
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography
    Xiaohui Su
    Qing Lin
    Chunxiao Cui
    Wenjian Xu
    Zhimin Wei
    Jie Fei
    Lili Li
    Breast Cancer, 2017, 24 : 562 - 570
  • [22] Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade
    Geunwon Kim
    Peter G. Mikhael
    Tawakalitu O. Oseni
    Manisha Bahl
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 6089 - 6098
  • [23] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326
  • [24] Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy L.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Osteras, Bjorn H.
    Gullien, Randi
    Gur, David
    Hofvind, Solveig
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [25] Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography
    Su, Xiaohui
    Lin, Qing
    Cui, Chunxiao
    Xu, Wenjian
    Wei, Zhimin
    Fei, Jie
    Li, Lili
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (04) : 562 - 570
  • [26] Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions
    Almasarweh, Sa'ed
    Sudah, Mazen
    Okuma, Hidemi
    Joukainen, Sarianna
    Karja, Vesa
    Vanninen, Ritva
    Masarwah, Amro
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 56 (04) : 461 - 470
  • [27] Imaging Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors with Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Bahl, Manisha
    Mercaldo, Sarah
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Lehman, Constance D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (02) : 308 - 316
  • [28] Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Li, Tong
    Isautier, Jennifer
    Lee, Janie M.
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Houssami, Nehmat
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2025, 25 (02) : e103 - e112
  • [29] Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography
    Alsheik, Nila
    Blount, Linda
    Qiong, Qiu
    Talley, Melinda
    Pohlman, Scott
    Troeger, Kathleen
    Abbey, Genevieve
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Pollack, Erica
    Chong, Alice
    Donadio, Greg
    Behling, Michael
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    Conant, Emily
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (07) : 906 - 918
  • [30] Improvement in diagnostic performance of breast cancer: comparison between conventional digital mammography alone and conventional mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis
    Ryoko Ohashi
    Michinobu Nagao
    Izumi Nakamura
    Takahiro Okamoto
    Shuji Sakai
    Breast Cancer, 2018, 25 : 590 - 596