Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback

被引:104
|
作者
Lee, Hyeon Woo [1 ]
Lim, Kyu Yon [2 ]
Grabowski, Barbara L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sangmyung Univ, Dept Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Suwon 441749, South Korea
[3] Penn State Univ, Instruct Syst Program, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Generative learning strategy; Self-regulation; Metacognitive feedback; Structural Equation Modeling (SEM); NOTE-TAKING;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Comprehension of science topics occurs when learners meaningfully generate relationships and conceptions about what they read. In this generation process, learners' cognitive and metacognitive regulation is one of the most critical factors influencing learning. However, learners are not always successful in regulating their own learning, especially in computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) where they are alone. Based on this rationale, the present study was designed to examine the effects of two scaffolding strategies-generative learning strategy prompts and metacognitive feedback-on learners' comprehension and self-regulation while learning the human heart system in a CBLE. Participants were 223 undergraduate student volunteers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to conceptualize and empirically test a model that explains mediating processes among variables. Results revealed that the combination of generative learning strategy prompts with metacognitive feedback improved learners' recall and comprehension by enhancing learners' self-regulation and better use of highlighting and summarizing as generative learning strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 648
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups
    Schuenemann, Nina
    Spoerer, Nadine
    Voellinger, Vanessa A.
    Brunstein, Joachim C.
    INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (04) : 395 - 415
  • [42] Effectiveness of Design-Based Science on Students’ Learning in Electrical Energy and Metacognitive Self-Regulation
    Yasemin Tas
    Gökhan Aksoy
    Ekrem Cengiz
    International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2019, 17 : 1109 - 1128
  • [43] The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: developmental changes in self-regulation and efficiency during learning
    Gökhan Gönül
    Nike Tsalas
    Markus Paulus
    Metacognition and Learning, 2021, 16 : 459 - 483
  • [44] Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self-regulation and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners
    Amini, Davoud
    Anhari, Mostafa Hosseini
    Ghasemzadeh, Abolfazl
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [45] Revisiting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: A Theoretical and Statistical Reevaluation of the Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Effort Regulation Subscales
    Dunn, Karee E.
    Lo, Wen-Juo
    Mulvenon, Sean W.
    Sutcliffe, Rachel
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2012, 72 (02) : 312 - 331
  • [46] Effectiveness of Design-Based Science on Students' Learning in Electrical Energy and Metacognitive Self-Regulation
    Tas, Yasemin
    Aksoy, Gokhan
    Cengiz, Ekrem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2019, 17 (06) : 1109 - 1128
  • [47] Self-regulation in vocabulary learning
    Nett, Ulrike
    Frenzel, Anne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 290 - 290
  • [48] The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: developmental changes in self-regulation and efficiency during learning
    Goenuel, Goekhan
    Tsalas, Nike
    Paulus, Markus
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2021, 16 (02) : 459 - 483
  • [49] A comprehensive reanalysis of the metacognitive self-regulation scale from the MSLQ
    Tock, Jamie L.
    Moxley, Jerad H.
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2017, 12 (01) : 79 - 111
  • [50] Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance
    Bracha Kramarski
    Metacognition and Learning, 2008, 3 : 83 - 99