Foley catheter and misoprostol for cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion

被引:5
|
作者
Chandrasekaran, Sruthi [1 ]
Paul, Maureen [1 ]
Ruggiero, Samantha [1 ]
Monschauer, Emily [1 ]
Blanchard, Kelly [1 ]
Robinson, Yashica [2 ]
机构
[1] Ibis Reprod Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
[2] Alabama Womens Ctr Reprod Alternat, Huntsville, AL 35810 USA
关键词
Dilation and evacuation (D&E); Second-trimester abortion; Foley; Balloon catheter;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.015
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Document the effectiveness and safety of Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol use for cervical preparation before a same-day dilation and evacuation (D&E). Study design: We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult patients with viable pregnancies at 18 weeks 0 days to 21 weeks 6 days gestation who received a same-day D&E at an Alabama clinic using a 30-cc Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol for cervical preparation from January 2016 through December 2017. Patients received misoprostol 800 mcg buccally at the time of Foley placement and then every 4 hours until the physician deemed that dilation/effacement was adequate to proceed with a D&E. We extracted patient demographics, pregnancy and medical history, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. We primarily evaluated effectiveness (D&E completion within one procedure day). Our secondary outcomes included safety, time between misoprostol and procedure start time, length of D&E, recovery time, and number of doses of misoprostol provided. Results: Two hundred and ninety patient charts met our review criteria - all of whom had a complete abortion in one day. Only one safety incident, a cervical laceration, occurred (0.3% of all procedures). The median time between Foley placement and first misoprostol dose and the procedure start was 7.2 hours (2.9-12.6 hours; interquartile range [IQR] 6.2-8.4 hours); median procedure length was 12 minutes (2-40 minutes; IQR 10-15 minutes); and median recovery time 14 minutes (4-89 minutes; IQR 14-16 minutes). Most patients needed two doses of misoprostol (n = 258, 89%), and 11 (4%) needed three doses; 21 (7%) patients needed one dose of misoprostol. Conclusion: Patients in the mid-second trimester can effectively and safely undergo cervical preparation with a Foley balloon catheter and misoprostol to facilitate completion of same-day D&E. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 441
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [33] Vaginal misoprostol 800 μg every 12 h for second-trimester abortion
    Carbonell, JLL
    Rodríguez, J
    Delgado, E
    Sánchez, C
    Vargas, F
    Valera, L
    Marí, J
    Valero, F
    Salvador, I
    Llorente, M
    CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 70 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [34] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elami-Suzin, Matan
    Freeman, Martine D.
    Porat, Nurit
    Rojansky, Nathan
    Laufer, Neri
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04): : 815 - 820
  • [35] COMPARISON OF THE FOLEY CATHETER AND DINOPROSTONE PESSARY FOR CERVICAL PREPARATION BEFORE 2ND TRIMESTER ABORTION
    HACKETT, GA
    REGINALD, P
    PAINTIN, DB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (12): : 1432 - 1434
  • [37] Second-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members
    O'Connell, Katharine
    Jones, Heidi E.
    Lichtenberg, E. Steve
    Paul, Maureen
    CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (06) : 492 - 499
  • [38] Second-trimester surgical abortion practices: A survey of national abortion federation members
    O'Connell, K.
    Jones, H.
    Lichtenberg, E. S.
    Paul, M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2008, 78 (02) : 169 - 169
  • [39] Cervical Preparation for First Trimester Surgical Abortion
    Gilliam, Melissa L.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (05): : 1075 - 1076
  • [40] Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Lohr, Patricia A.
    Ngo, Thoai D.
    Hayes, Jennifer L.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (02):