共 50 条
Comparison of the diagnostic value of four scoring systems in primary sjogren's syndrome patients
被引:14
|作者:
Qi, Xuan
[1
]
Sun, Chao
[1
]
Tian, Yu
[1
]
Han, Yuxiang
[1
]
Peng, Chenxing
[1
]
Jin, Hongtao
[1
]
Gao, Lixia
[1
]
Guo, Huifang
[1
]
机构:
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Rheumatism & Immunol, Hosp 2, 215 Heping Rd, Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词:
Primary sjogren's syndrome;
Salivary gland ultrasonography;
Receiver operating characteristic;
Sensitivity;
Specificity;
SALIVARY-GLAND ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA;
SIALOGRAPHY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.imlet.2017.05.009
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
Purpose: We attempted to evaluate the diagnostic value of different salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) scoring systems for primary sjogren's syndrome (pSS). Methods: Total 134 patients with pSS and 109 non-SS sicca controls were included in our study. All the cases were evaluated by four scoring systems (such as 0-16 SGUS, 0-3 SGUS, Parotid glands and Submandibular salivary glands scoring system). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for the four scoring systems. Results: The mean scores of pSS patients were significantly higher than that of controls by four scoring systems (P < 0.01). The AUC (area under the curve) of (0-16) SGUS scoring system (0.916) was higher than Submandibular salivary glands scoring system (0.885) (P = 0.016). No significant difference of AUC was observed in (0-3) SGUS scoring system, compared with 0-16, parotid gland and submandibular salivary glands scoring system. The optimal cutoff value of (0-16) SGUS, (0-3) SGUS, Parotid gland, Submandibular salivary glands scoring system was 5, 2, 3, 2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity of the four scoring systems. Conclusion: The simplified parotid gland scoring system may be the simplified and feasible method for pSS diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 12
页数:4
相关论文