Preoperative anxiety in preschool children: A randomized clinical trial comparing midazolam, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine

被引:37
|
作者
Bromfalk, Asa [1 ]
Myrberg, Tomi [1 ]
Wallden, Jakob [2 ]
Engstrom, Asa [3 ]
Hultin, Magnus [4 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med Sunderbyn, Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med Sundsvall, Umea, Sweden
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, Nursing Care, Lulea, Sweden
[4] Umea Univ, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
anesthesiology; children; clinical trials; clonidine; dexmedetomidine; midazolam; premedication; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREANESTHETIC MEDICATION; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; PREMEDICATION; SEDATION; BIOAVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.14279
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Introduction Anxiety in pediatric patients may challenge perioperative anesthesiology management and worsen postoperative outcomes. Sedative drugs aimed to reducing anxiety are available with different pharmacologic profiles, and there is no consensus on their effect or the best option for preschool children. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of three different premedications on anxiety before anesthesia induction in preschool children aged 2-6 years scheduled for elective surgery. The secondary outcomes comprised distress during peripheral catheter (PVC) insertion, compliance at anesthesia induction, and level of sedation. Patients and methods In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 90 participants aged 2-6 years, who were scheduled for elective ear-, nose-and-throat surgery. The participants were randomly assigned to three groups: those who were administered 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam, 4 mu g/kg oral clonidine, or 2 mu g/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine. Anxiety, distress during PVC insertion, compliance with mask during preoxygenation, and sedation were measured using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale, Behavioral Distress Scale, Induction Compliance Checklist, and Ramsay Sedation Scale, respectively. Results Six children who refused premedication were excluded, leaving 84 enrolled patients. At baseline, all groups had similar levels of preoperative anxiety and distress. During anesthesia preparation, anxiety was increased in the children who received clonidine and dexmedetomidine; however, it remained unaltered in the midazolam group. There were no differences in distress during PVC insertion or compliance at induction between the groups. The children in the clonidine and dexmedetomidine groups developed higher levels of sedation than those in the midazolam group. Conclusions In preschool children, midazolam resulted in a more effective anxiolysis and less sedation compared to clonidine and dexmedetomidine.
引用
收藏
页码:1225 / 1233
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clonidine Versus Midazolam Premedication and Postoperative Negative Behavioral Changes in Younger Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zickerman, Caroline
    Hult, Ann-Catrin
    Hedlund, Lars
    Winso, Ola
    Johansson, Goran
    Haney, Michael
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 135 (02): : 307 - 315
  • [42] TikTok browsing for anxiety relief in the preoperative period: A randomized clinical trial
    Gu, Shuhan
    Ping, Jianfan
    Xu, Mingxia
    Zhou, Yanfeng
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2021, 60
  • [43] Guided imagery relaxation therapy on preoperative anxiety: a randomized clinical trial
    dos Santos Felix, Marcia Marques
    Guimaraes Ferreira, Maria Beatriz
    de Oliveira, Lucas Felix
    Barichello, Elizabeth
    Pires, Patricia da Silva
    Barbosa, Maria Helena
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2018, 26
  • [44] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients A Randomized Trial
    Riker, Richard R.
    Shehabi, Yahya
    Bokesch, Paula M.
    Ceraso, Daniel
    Wisemandle, Wayne
    Koura, Firas
    Whitten, Patrick
    Margolis, Benjamin D.
    Byrne, Daniel W.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Rocha, Marcelo G.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 301 (05): : 489 - 499
  • [45] DEXMEDETOMIDINE VS MIDAZOLAM FOR MEDICAL THORACOSCOPY-RANDOMIZED, NONINFERIORITY TRIAL
    Kumar, Vinod
    Sirohiya, Prashant
    Gupta, Nishkarsh
    Garg, Rakesh
    Bharti, Sachidanand Jee
    Madan, Karan
    Misra, Seema
    Bhatnagar, Sushma
    Hadda, Vijay
    Drbrairch, Anant Mohan
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 : 52 - 53
  • [46] The interest of intranasal clonidine in the prevention of perioperative children's anxiety: a prospective randomized trial
    Keskes, Mariem
    Amouri, Nouha
    Ketata, Salma
    Derbel, Rahma
    Charfi, Maha
    Zouche, Imen
    Sallemi, Moncef
    Elloumi, Moez
    Chikhrouhou, Hichem
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 46
  • [47] Efficacy of premedication with intravenous midazolam on preoperative anxiety and mask compliance in pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Li, Wenxian
    Jia, Jie
    Qiao, Hui
    Chen, Jing
    Lv, Peipei
    Ye, Zhou
    Lu, Yu
    TRANSLATIONAL PEDIATRICS, 2022, 11 (11) : 1751 - 1758
  • [48] Comparison of the effects of intranasal midazolam versus different doses of intranasal ketamine on reducing preoperative pediatric anxiety: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    S. A. Hosseini Jahromi
    S. M. Hosseini Valami
    Nematollah Adeli
    Zohreh Yazdi
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2012, 26 : 878 - 882
  • [49] Comparison of the effects of intranasal midazolam versus different doses of intranasal ketamine on reducing preoperative pediatric anxiety: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Jahromi, S. A. Hosseini
    Valami, S. M. Hosseini
    Adeli, Nematollah
    Yazdi, Zohreh
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (06) : 878 - 882
  • [50] A comparison of the effects of midazolam, propofol and dexmedetomidine on the antioxidant system: A randomized trial
    Han, Chao
    Ding, Weiliang
    Jiang, Wenjie
    Chen, Yu
    Hang, Dongyuan
    Gu, Daming
    Jiang, Guojun
    Tan, Yongfei
    Ge, Zhijun
    Ma, Tieliang
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (06) : 2293 - 2298