Symptom-based remote assessment in post-treatment head and neck cancer surveillance: A prospective national study

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Henry [1 ]
Hardman, John C. [1 ]
Tikka, Theofano [1 ]
Nankivell, Paul [2 ]
Mehanna, Hisham [2 ]
Paleri, Vinidh [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Head & Neck Unit, 203 Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Head & Neck Studies & Educ InHANSE, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
multicentre; observational; outpatient; risk; triage; F-18-FDG PET/CT SURVEILLANCE; FOLLOW-UP; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1111/coa.13948
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives To report the incidence of locoregional recurrence in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients under surveillance following treatment undergoing symptom-based remote assessment. Design A 16-week multicentre prospective cohort study. Setting UK ENT departments. Participants HNC patients under surveillance following treatment undergoing symptom-based telephone assessment. Main outcome measures Incidence of locoregional recurrent HNC after minimum 6-month follow-up. Results Data for 1078 cases were submitted by 16 centres, with follow-up data completed in 98.9% (n = 1066). Following telephone consultation, 83.7% of referrals had their face-to-face appointments deferred (n = 897/1072). New symptoms were reported by 11.6% (n = 124/1072) at telephone assessment; 72.6% (n = 90/124) of this group were called for urgent assessments, of whom 48.9% (n = 44/90) came directly for imaging without preceding clinical review. The sensitivity and specificity for new symptoms as an indicator of cancer recurrence were 35.3% and 89.4%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 99.7% (p = .002). Locoregional cancer identification rates after a minimum of 6 months of further monitoring, when correlated with time since treatment, were 6.0% (n = 14/233) <1 year; 2.1% (n = 16/747) between 1 and 5 years; and 4.3% (n = 4/92) for those >5 years since treatment. Conclusions Telephone assessment, using patient-reported symptoms, to identify recurrent locoregional HNC was widely adopted during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. The majority of patients had no face-to-face reviews or investigations. New symptoms were significantly associated with the identification of locoregional recurrent cancers with a high specificity, but a low sensitivity may limit symptom assessment being used as the sole surveillance method.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 567
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recall for assessment after post-treatment surveillance mammograms in breast cancer
    Wassermann, M.
    Swinson, C.
    Shrestha, D.
    Kirkpatrick, K.
    Ravichandran, D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [22] Targeted sequencing reveals TP53 as a potential diagnostic biomarker in the post-treatment surveillance of head and neck cancer
    van Ginkel, Joost H.
    de Leng, Wendy W. J.
    de Bree, Remco
    van Es, Robert J. J.
    Willems, Stefan M.
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (38) : 61575 - 61586
  • [23] Head and neck cancer survivors’ preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
    Sylvia L. Crowder
    Katherine G. Douglas
    Andrew D. Frugé
    William R. Carroll
    Sharon A. Spencer
    Julie L. Locher
    Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
    Laura Q. Rogers
    Anna E. Arthur
    Nutrition Journal, 18
  • [24] Comorbidity in head and neck cancer: Is it associated with therapeutic delay, post-treatment mortality and survival in a population-based study?
    Stordeur, Sabine
    Schillemans, Viki
    Savoye, Isabelle
    Vanschoenbeek, Katrijn
    Leroy, Roos
    Macq, Gilles
    Verleye, Leen
    De Gendt, Cindy
    Nuyts, Sandra
    Vermorken, Jan
    Beguin, Claire
    Gregoire, Vincent
    Van Eycken, Liesbet
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 102
  • [25] Head and neck cancer survivors' preferences for and evaluations of a post-treatment dietary intervention
    Crowder, Sylvia L.
    Douglas, Katherine G.
    Fruge, Andrew D.
    Carroll, William R.
    Spencer, Sharon A.
    Locher, Julie L.
    Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
    Rogers, Laura Q.
    Arthur, Anna E.
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [26] A comparison of patient reported outcome instruments for symptom impact on quality-of-life for head and neck cancer patients post-treatment
    Yarschenko, Adam
    Weppler, Sarah
    Barbera, Lisa
    Quon, Harvey
    Sun, Qiao
    Smith, Wendy
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (08) : 4659 - 4659
  • [27] Frequency of post-treatment surveillance and survival in localized prostate cancer: AFT-30 a national study
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Mohammed, Zahed
    Schumacher, Jessica R.
    Francescatti, Amanda B.
    Cuddy, Amanda
    Chang, George J.
    Kozower, Benjamin D.
    Greenberg, Caprice Christian
    McCarthy, Anne
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Winchester, David P.
    Basak, Ramsankar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [28] Frequency of Post-Treatment PSA Surveillance in Localized Prostate Cancer: AFT-30, a National Study
    Moon, D. H.
    Basak, R.
    Mohammed, Z.
    Francescatti, A.
    Chen, R. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E421 - E421
  • [29] A PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE: TSH MONITORING FOR POST-TREATMENT HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS
    Concert, Catherine
    Peyser, Amanda
    Riccobene, Ann
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2018, 45 (02)
  • [30] Post-treatment evaluation of head and neck cancer patients in the era of advanced imaging and value-based care
    Hirsch, Thomas
    Stadler, Michael
    Campbell, Bruce
    Firat, Selim
    Massey, Becky
    Schultz, Christopher J.
    Shukla, Monica
    Wong, Stuart J.
    Robbins, Jared R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)