Clinical Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer: Comparison with Adjuvant RT/CCRT Using Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment Weighting

被引:10
|
作者
Jung, Phill-Seung [1 ]
Kim, Dae-Yeon [1 ]
Lee, Shin-Wha [1 ]
Park, Jeong-Yeol [1 ]
Suh, Dae-Shik [1 ]
Kim, Jong-Hyeok [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Man [1 ]
Kim, Young-Tak [1 ]
Nam, Joo-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med,Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
PELVIC RADIATION-THERAPY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; INTERMEDIATE-RISK; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; UTERINE CERVIX; CARCINOMA; TRACHELECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; RADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0132298
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the clinical role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients. Study Design A cohort of 262 patients with cervical cancer who received radical hysterectomy (RH) and adjuvant therapy at Asan Medical Center between 1992 and 2012 was enrolled. In this cohort, 85 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 177 received adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy (AR). Oncologic outcomes and adverse events in both treatment arms were compared using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models with inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) to reduce the impact of treatment selection bias and potential confounding factors. Results During a 46.8-month median follow-up duration, 39 patients (14.9%) had recurrences, and 18 patients (6.9%) died of disease. In multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence and death was not significantly different in patients in either treatment arm (p=0.62 and 0.12, respectively). Also, after IPTW matching, the HR for recurrence did not significantly differ between the arms (HR 1.57, 95% CI 0.68-3.62, p=0.29). Similarly, disease-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the arms (p=0.47 and 0.13, respectively). In addition, patients with AC had a much lower prevalence of long-term complications (lymphedema: n=8 (9.4%) vs. 46 (26.0%), p=0.03; ureteral stricture: n=0 vs. 9 (6.2%), p=0.05). Conclusion Patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer can benefit from AC after RH with fewer long-term complications and non-inferior therapeutic effect to AR. Chemotherapy may therefore be an alternative adjuvant treatment option for cervical cancer, particularly in younger patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] IS THERE A ROLE FOR ADJUVANT PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY AFTER RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN EARLY STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER
    THOMAS, GM
    DEMBO, AJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1991, 1 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [32] Role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer
    Alonso-Espias, Maria
    Pulgar, Mikel Gorostidi
    Garcia-Pineda, Virginia
    Gracia, Myriam
    Diestro, Maria Dolores
    Siegrist, Jaime
    Rodriguez, Isabel
    Belinchon, Belen
    Hernandez, Alicia
    Zapardiel, Ignacio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_1) : A85 - A85
  • [33] Effect of pelvic radiotherapy on patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy: A single-center retrospective study
    Ishizawa, Chihiro
    Taguchi, Ayumi
    Tanikawa, Michihiro
    Honjo, Harunori
    Nishijima, Akira
    Eguchi, Satoko
    Miyamoto, Yuichiro
    Sone, Kenbun
    Tsuruga, Tetsushi
    Mori, Mayuyo
    Osuga, Yutaka
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 25 (03)
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of consolidation chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with risk factors: a retrospective single-center study
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Guo, Huaijuan
    Yang, Jingjing
    Mao, Jingxian
    Wang, Ying
    Gao, Ruidong
    Yan, Xuebing
    Wang, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [35] Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB and IIA Cervical Cancer With Tumor Diameter of 3 cm or Greater
    Kong, Tae Wook
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Lee, Jisun
    Paek, Jiheum
    Ryu, Hee-Sug
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (02) : 280 - 288
  • [36] Adjuvant chemotherapy versus radiation therapy after radical surgery in high-risk positive node Stage IB/IIA cervical cancer
    Mossa, B.
    Mossa, S.
    Marziani, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) : 545 - 550
  • [37] Adjuvant chemotherapy improves prognosis of resectable stage IV colorectal cancer: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Takiyama, Hirotoshi
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Hata, Keisuke
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Nishikawa, Takeshi
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Kaneko, Manabu
    Murono, Koji
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Sonoda, Hirofumi
    Nakajima, Jun
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 11
  • [38] Role of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma and intermediate risk factors
    Nasioudis, Dimitrios
    Latif, Nawar A.
    Giuntoli II, Robert L.
    Haggerty, Ashley F.
    Cory, Lori
    Kim, Sarah H.
    Morgan, Mark A.
    Ko, Emily M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (06) : 829 - 834
  • [39] Adjuvant combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of early stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
    Benoit, MF
    Hatch, S
    Hannigan, EV
    Arrastia, CD
    Dinh, TA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 492S - 492S
  • [40] Prospective multicenter study on urologic complications after radical surgery with or without radiotherapy in the treatment of stage IB-IIA cervical cancer
    Zola, P
    Maggino, T
    Sacco, M
    Rumore, A
    Sinistrero, G
    Maggi, R
    Landoni, F
    Foglia, G
    Sartori, E
    De Toffoli, J
    Franchi, M
    Romagnolo, C
    Sismondi, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2000, 10 (01) : 59 - 66