Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

被引:43
|
作者
Lim, Sang Woo [1 ]
Huh, Jung Wook [1 ]
Kim, Young Jin [1 ]
Kim, Hyeong Rok [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Hwasun Hosp, Dept Colon & Rectal Surg, Hwasun Gun 519809, Jeollanamdo, South Korea
关键词
TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SPHINCTER PRESERVATION; ANAL-SPHINCTER; TUMOR SPREAD; CHEMORADIATION; RECURRENCE; OUTCOMES; MARGIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-011-1277-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is helpful in the management of patients with low rectal cancer. With the advent of this technique, the need for performance of abdominoperineal resection seems to have decreased in patients with very low rectal tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, the functional outcome, and the short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic ISR for low rectal adenocarcinoma at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 111 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR for low rectal adenocarcinoma between July 2005 and December 2009. Demographic status, surgical outcomes, functional outcome data, and oncologic outcome data were collected. The mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3.4 cm (range: 1-5 cm). The mean operative time was 214.7 min (range, 150-450 min). The mean distal resection margin was 1.3 +/- A 1.1 cm. Morbidity occurred in 24 patients (21.6%), including anastomotic leakage in 2 patients (1.8%). The mean Wexner continence score after stoma repair was 7.5 +/- A 2.7 (range: 2 similar to 19), and 9.8 in total ISR, 7.3 in partial ISR (P = 0.071). The 3-year overall survival rate was 92.8%, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 73.0%. Local recurrence was noted in 6 of the 111 patients with TNM stage I to III (5.4%). The patients with lesions at 2 cm to the dentate line had a 7.07-fold greater risk of local recurrence, including a 13.42-fold greater risk of lateral pelvic wall recurrence and perineal recurrence (95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.141-158.006; P = 0.009) than in those who had lesions more than 2 cm from the anal verge (95% CI, 1.290-38.832; P = 0.011). Laparoscopic ISR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation can be recommended as a technically feasible, minimally invasive, and a sphincter-saving procedure with acceptable functional and short-term oncologic outcomes in patients with very low rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2811 / 2817
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer
    Williams, N. S.
    Bhan, C.
    Murphy, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) : 397 - 397
  • [22] Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
    Xv, Yifan
    Fan, Jiajun
    Ding, Yuan
    Hu, Yang
    Hu, Yingjie
    Jiang, Zhengjie
    Tao, Qingsong
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2020
  • [23] Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Hanyu Chen
    Bin Ma
    Peng Gao
    Hongchi Wang
    Yongxi Song
    Linhao Tong
    Peiwen Li
    Zhenning Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 15
  • [24] Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Patients with cTl-T2 Low Rectal Cancer
    Shiomi, Akio
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Tsukamoto, Syunsuke
    Tomioka, Hiroyuki
    Kagawa, Hiroyasu
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 30 (4-6) : 272 - 277
  • [25] Clinical efficacy of different approaches for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: a comparison study
    Wenquan Ou
    Xiaohua Wu
    Jinfu Zhuang
    Yuanfeng Yang
    Yiyi Zhang
    Xing Liu
    Guoxian Guan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 20
  • [26] IMPLICATION OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL RESECTION MARGIN IN INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION OF LOW RECTAL CANCER
    Choi, G.
    Kim, H.
    Park, J.
    Park, S.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (05) : E268 - E268
  • [27] Clinical efficacy of different approaches for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: a comparison study
    Ou, Wenquan
    Wu, Xiaohua
    Zhuang, Jinfu
    Yang, Yuanfeng
    Zhang, Yiyi
    Liu, Xing
    Guan, Guoxian
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [28] Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Hanyu
    Ma, Bin
    Gao, Peng
    Wang, Hongchi
    Song, Yongxi
    Tong, Linhao
    Li, Peiwen
    Wang, Zhenning
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 15
  • [29] A comparison of the long-term anorectal function between laparoscopic intersphincteric resection and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer
    Kenji Kawada
    Koya Hida
    Suguru Hasegawa
    Yoshiharu Sakai
    Surgery Today, 2018, 48 : 921 - 927
  • [30] INTERSPHINCTERIC RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL TUMORS
    SCHIESSEL, R
    KARNERHANUSCH, J
    HERBST, F
    TELEKY, B
    WUNDERLICH, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) : 1376 - 1378