Forage-based beef finishing systems: A review

被引:24
|
作者
Griebenow, RL [1 ]
Martz, FA [1 ]
Morrow, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSOURI,FORAGE SYST RES CENT,CORNET FARM,LINNEUS,MO 64653
来源
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE | 1997年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jpa1997.0084
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to review alternative methods of increasing the use of forage in beef finishing systems. Most finishing systems based on an all-forage diet have not been particularly successful. Without grain finishing, the final product can have an inconsistent quality grade and a grassy flavor. The greatest sensory difference between forage-fed and grain-fed steers appears to be the flavor of the fat. Diterpenoids seem to be the off-flavor's source. These are derived from the action of ruminal microorganisms as they break down chlorophyll. Phyt-2-ene has been identified as the most discriminating compound for off-favor It was also found to be the strongest indicator that a steer had been forage-finished. As time on grain lengthened, the levels of - tetradecalactone and -hexadecalactone increased, indicating their correlation with desirable flavor characteristics of grain-finished beef. Other investigators have correlated the off-flavor to C 18:3 unsaturated fatty acids. The two methods that show the most promise and increase the use of forage in beef finishing systems are (i) supplemental feeding of cattle on pastures to reduce length of time required for feedlot finishing and (ii) finishing cattle in a pasture with supplemented energy. Efforts to reduce feedlot time have lessened the total concentrate fed and have been economically successful. When finishing cattle in a pasture with supplemental energy, those studies that limited grain intake the last 60 to 80 d before slaughter had mixed results. However, when proper forage management was used in order to ensure adequate supply of high quality forage, carcasses with acceptable quality were produced. Researchers who provided limited supplementation or energy for at least 112 d and fed free choice grain the last 60 to 80 d before slaughter reported that USDA Choice beef was produced. However, USDA quality grade is not necessarily an adequate means to determine the effectiveness of a pasture-based finishing system. Researchers have to determine when meat flavor changes from ''grass'' to ''grain'' and the possibility of achieving this transfer on pasture with energy supplementation.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of forage- and grain-based feeding systems on beef quality: A review
    Muir, PD
    Deaker, JM
    Bown, MD
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (04) : 623 - 635
  • [32] Warm-season annual forages in forage-finishing beef systems: I. Forage yield and quality
    Harmon, Deidre D.
    Hancock, Dennis W.
    Stewart, Robert L., Jr.
    Lacey, Jenna L.
    Mckee, Robert W.
    Hale, John D.
    Thomas, Chevise L.
    Ford, Elyse
    Segers, Jacob R.
    Teutsch, Chris D.
    Stelzleni, Alexander M.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 3 (02) : 911 - 926
  • [33] Physiological responses and forage accumulation of Marandu palisadegrass and Mombaca guineagrass to nitrogen fertilizer in the Brazilian forage-based systems
    Domiciano, Leandro F.
    dos Santos, Mariely L.
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    dos Santos, Patricia M.
    Pereira, Dalton H.
    Pedreira, Bruno C.
    GRASSLAND SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (02) : 93 - 101
  • [34] Soil respiration dynamics in forage-based and cereal-based cropping systems in central Italy
    Francioni, Matteo
    Lai, Roberto
    D'Ottavio, Paride
    Trozzo, Laura
    Kishimoto-Mo, Ayaka W.
    Budimir, Katarina
    Baldoni, Nora
    Toderi, Marco
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2020, 77 (03):
  • [35] Effects of lasalocid, narasin, or virginiamycin supplementation on rumen parameters and performance of beef cattle fed forage-based diet
    Miszura, Alexandre Arantes
    Marques, Rodrigo S.
    Polizel, Daniel Montanher
    Cappellozza, Bruno Ieda
    Cruz, Vinicius Alves
    Ogg, Makayla Anne
    Barroso, Jose Paulo Roman
    Oliveira, Gabriela Bagio
    Martins, Andre Storti
    Limede, Arnaldo Cintra
    Ferreira, Evandro Maia
    Gouvea, Vinicius N.
    Pires, Alexandre Vaz
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [36] Nitrogen and phosphorus status of soils and trophic state of lakes associated with forage-based beef cattle operations in Florida
    Sigua, GC
    Williams, MJ
    Coleman, SW
    Starks, R
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (01) : 240 - 252
  • [37] Long-term effects of grazing and haying on soil nutrient dynamics in forage-based beef cattle operations
    Sigua, Gilbert C.
    Williams, Mary J.
    Coleman, Samuel W.
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2006, 29 (03): : 115 - 134
  • [38] Economic evaluation of forage-fed vs concentrate-fed beef finishing systems
    Robertson, Joel
    Tollefson, Rebecca L.
    Winebold, Deedra M.
    Deaton, Claire
    King, Adam
    Case, Riley
    Church, Emily R.
    Holder, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 343 - 343
  • [39] Production systems for growing and finishing beef steers in pasture: Evaluation of animal performance and forage characteristics
    do Prado, LN
    Moreira, FB
    Cecato, U
    Wada, RY
    de Oliveira, E
    Rego, FCD
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2003, 32 (04): : 955 - 965
  • [40] Economic Evaluation of Forage-Fed vs Concentrate-Fed Beef Finishing Systems
    O'Malley, Micah L.
    Robertson, Caleb
    Holder, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101