Work status and work ability after radical prostatectomy or active surveillance for prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Nilsson, Rasmus [1 ,2 ]
Dahl, Alv A. [2 ,3 ]
Bernklev, Tomm [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kersten, Hege [6 ]
Haug, Erik S. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, POB 2900, N-3710 Skien, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Radiumhosp, Natl Advisory Unit Late Effects Canc Therapy, Oslo, Norway
[4] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Tonsberg, Norway
[5] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Skien, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Biosci, Oslo, Norway
[7] Vestfold Hosp Trust, Dept Urol, Tonsberg, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Canc Genom & Informat, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Active surveillance; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; work status; work ability; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NORWEGIAN POPULATION; SICK LEAVE; FATIGUE; SURVIVORS; HEALTH; RETURN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1080/21681805.2020.1750473
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Being able to work is important for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and little is known about work life after radical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim was to investigate work status (WS) and work ability (WA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS) for PCa, and to identify factors associated with reduced WA. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of 606 men treated with RP (n = 442) or AS (n = 164) at two Norwegian general hospitals. In 2017, they were asked to complete questionnaires measuring adverse effects (AE), HRQoL, aspects of work life and psychological factors at a median of 4.1 (range 1.3-8.1) years after diagnosis. Clinical data were retrieved from medical records. WS was categorized into employed, unemployed or retired. WA was rated using the Work Ability Index. Regression analyses were performed to find factors associated with reduced WA. Results: WS was similar for the RP and AS groups at diagnosis and survey. There was a small reduction in WA from diagnosis to survey and the difference between the RP and AS groups was non-significant. Older age, poorer self-rated health, poorer incontinence score, more chronic fatigue, and increased anxiety and depressive symptoms were associated with reduced WA, while treatment method, urinary bother and use of pads were not. Conclusion: The impact of RP and AS on WS and WA was almost similar. Age and psychological variables were more strongly associated with reduced WA than cancer-related variables.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PROSTATE CANCER Prediction of node-negative status after radical prostatectomy
    Tosco, Lorenzo
    Joniau, Steven
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2013, 10 (11) : 627 - 628
  • [32] Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Koie, Takuya
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Kakoi, Narihiko
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Arai, Yoichi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 914 - 920
  • [33] Immediate Versus Delayed Radical Prostatectomy: Updated Outcomes Following Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Filippou, Pauline
    Welty, Christopher J.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Perez, Nannette
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (03) : 458 - 463
  • [34] RADIOTHERAPY AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PROSTATE CANCER
    Lainez, C.
    Vila, A.
    Sanchez-Reyes, A.
    Artola, N.
    Moya, L. M.
    Julia, J. C.
    Pedro, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S338 - S339
  • [35] Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: does it work?
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Bianchi, Marco
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Roupret, Morgan
    Salonia, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2015, 4 (02) : 110 - 123
  • [36] The Current Status of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Pan, David L. W.
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Eldefrawy, Ahmed
    Manoharan, Murugesan
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2012, 124 (03) : 50 - 58
  • [37] Current status of active surveillance in prostate cancer
    Chung, Mun Su
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 57 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [38] Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance
    Norman, Zambrano
    Militza, Petric
    Andres, Figueroa
    Daniela, Fleck
    Alejandro, Mercado
    Catherine, Sanchez
    Juan, Fulla
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2014, 40 (02): : 154 - 159
  • [39] Pathology findings after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in patients eligible for active surveillance: Contribution of multiparametric MRI to treatment decision
    Martin-Malburet, A.
    Marcq, G.
    Leroy, X.
    Guiffart, P.
    Fantoni, J. -C.
    Flannand, V.
    Villers, A.
    Puech, P.
    Ouzzane, A.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2018, 28 (8-9): : 425 - 433
  • [40] Effect of socioeconomic status and race on outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer
    Koppie, T. M.
    Robbins, A. S.
    Mills, P. K.
    White, R. W. deVere
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)