Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens

被引:9
|
作者
Postema, Arnoud W. [1 ]
Gayet, Maudy C. W. [2 ,3 ]
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [3 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [3 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [1 ]
Savci-Heijink, C. Dilara [4 ]
Schalk, Stefan G. [3 ]
Kajtazovic, Amir [2 ]
van der Poel, Henk [5 ]
Mulders, Peter F. A. [6 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,3 ]
Mischi, Massimo [3 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Henri Dunantstr 1, NL-5223 GZ Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Prostate cancer; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Dispersion analysis; Radical prostatectomy; Quantitative imaging; MULTIPARAMETRIC ULTRASOUND; AGENT DISPERSION; BIOPSY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ANGIOGENESIS; DIAGNOSIS; DETECT; MRI; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-020-03103-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the value of two-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging and the additional value of contrast ultrasound dispersion imaging (CUDI) for the localization of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods In this multicentre study, subjects scheduled for a radical prostatectomy underwent 2D CEUS imaging preoperatively. CUDI maps were generated from the CEUS recordings. Both CEUS recordings and CUDI maps were scored on the likelihood of presenting csPCa (any Gleason >= 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 larger than 0.5 mL) by five observers and compared to radical prostatectomy histopathology. An automated three-dimensional (3D) fusion protocol was used to match imaging with histopathology. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed per observer and imaging modality. Results 133 of 216 (62%) patients were included in the final analysis. Average area under the ROC for all five readers for CEUS, CUDI and the combination was 0.78, 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. This yields a sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 64% for CEUS, 83 and 56% for CUDI and 83 and 55% for the combination. Interobserver agreement for CEUS, CUDI and the combination showed kappa values of 0.20, 0.18 and 0.18 respectively. Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of 2D CEUS and CUDI for csPCa localization are moderate. Despite compressing CEUS in one image, CUDI showed a similar performance to 2D CEUS. With a sensitivity of 83% at cutoff point 3, it could become a useful imaging procedure, especially with 4D acquisition, improved quantification and combination with other US imaging techniques such as elastography.
引用
收藏
页码:2811 / 2818
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer and kidney lesions
    Mitterberger, Michael
    Pelzer, Alexandre
    Colleselli, Daniela
    Bartsch, Georg
    Strasser, Hannes
    Pallwein, Leo
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Gradl, Johann
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (02) : 231 - 238
  • [32] Dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic-phased array magnetic resonance imaging for detection of localized prostate cancer: Correlation with radical prostatectomy findings
    Potiron, Eric
    Bouye, Sebastien
    Puech, Philippe
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Leroy, Xavier
    Fantoni, Jean Christophe
    Biserte, Jacques
    Villers, Arnauld
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 644 - 644
  • [33] CONTRAST ULTRASOUND DISPERSION IMAGING: A NEW APPROACH FOR PROSTATE CANCER LOCALIZATION
    Mischi, Massimo
    Kuenen, Maarten
    Smeenge, Martijn
    Pes, Maria Pilar Laguna
    De la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A244 - A244
  • [34] Prostate Contrast Enhanced Transrectal Ultrasound Evaluation of the Prostate With Whole-Mount Prostatectomy Correlation
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    Calio, Brian P.
    Kamel, Sarah, I
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Forsberg, Flemming
    McCue, Peter
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 133 : 187 - 191
  • [35] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Quantitative Perfusion Analysis in Patients with Suspicion for Prostate Cancer
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Fischer, Thomas
    Schwabe, Julia
    Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
    Stephan, Carsten
    Peters, Robert
    Slowinski, Torsten
    von Laffert, Maximilian
    Garcia, Stephan Rodrigo Marticorena
    Hamm, Bernd
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2019, 40 (03): : 340 - 348
  • [36] Analysis of the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in early diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Zhang, Chundong
    Feng, Meicong
    Fang, Qinmao
    Deng, Heping
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Wu, Xia
    Zhang, Bo
    Guan, Yiman
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2022, 113 (06) : 1032 - 1034
  • [37] TRANSABDOMINAL CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IMAGING OF THE PROSTATE
    Mischi, Massimo
    Demi, Libertario
    Smeenge, Martijn
    Kuenen, Maarten P. J.
    Postema, Arnoud W.
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (04): : 1112 - 1118
  • [38] Reproducibility of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound of the prostate
    Sedelaar, JPM
    Goossen, TEB
    Wijkstra, H
    De la Rosette, JJMCH
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 27 (05): : 595 - 602
  • [39] Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer
    Postema, Arnoud W.
    Frinking, Peter J. A.
    Smeenge, Martijn
    De Reijke, Theo M.
    De la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Tranquart, Francois
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (04) : 598 - 603
  • [40] FLASH REPLENISHMENT IMAGING WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION
    Zola, Joseph C., Jr.
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    Forsberg, Flemming
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 828 - 829