18F-choline PET/CT in prostate cancer biochemical relapse after external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy: Impact of PSA and kinetics

被引:0
|
作者
Playe, M. [1 ,2 ]
Cassou-Mounat, T. [1 ,2 ]
Champion, L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Curie, Site St Cloud,35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 St Cloud, France
[2] Inst Curie, Site Paris,26 Rue Ulm, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
F-18-Choline PET/CT; Biochemical relapse; External beam radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; PSA kinetics; ANTIGEN DOUBLING TIME; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION; C-11-CHOLINE PET/CT; RADIATION-THERAPY; NATURAL-HISTORY; CHOLINE PET/CT; TRIGGER PSA; RADIOLABELED CHOLINE; DETECTION RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.mednuc.2019.12.001
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim. - To determine the impact of PSA and its kinetics on F-18-Choline PET/CT (FCH PET) ability to detect site of relapse in prostate cancer initially treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy (IBT). Methods. - We retrospectively enrolled PET FCH performed for suspicion of biochemical relapse after EBRT/IBT from January 2010 to January 2017 at Institut Curie. PSA(trigger), DPSA(nadir) (PSA(trigger)-PSA(nadir)), PSA doubling time (PSA(dt)) and velocity (PSA(vel)) were compared between positive and negative results. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between these parameters and PET ability to detect True Positives (TP). Results. - In all, 271 FCH PET met the inclusion criteria: 169 after treatment with EBRT and 102 after IBT. Positivity rate was 67.9%, and 63.4% of TP were local relapses. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 81.2% and 71.0%. PSA(trigger) was 3.32 ng/mL (interquartile space: IQS 2.28-5.77) when PET was negative and 5.15 ng/mL (IQS 3.16-10.17) when positive, Delta PSA(nadir) was respectively 2.76 ng/mL (IQS 1.84-4.69) and 4.57 ng/mL (IQS 2.48-8.85), PSAdt 10.78 months (IQS 5.46-20.07) and 7.23 months (EI 2.58-14.14), and PSAvel 2.16 ng/mL/year (EI 1.02-4.80) et 4.92 ng/mL/year (1.89-16.02) (P < 0.001). Positivity rate increased with PSA(trigger) and Delta PSA(nadir). We found PSA(dt) <= 9 months (P = 0.029; OR = 2.97, IC95% [1.12-7.88]) and DPSA(nadir) >= 3 ng/mL (P = 0.03; OR = 2.56, IC95% [1.37-4.77]) to be independent predictive factors of PET sensitivity. Conclusion. - Detection of relapse after EBRT or IBT with PET FCH is influenced by PSA and its kinetics. In our study, PSA(dt) and Delta PSA(nadir) were independant predictors of PET performance, but initial treatment and tumor characteristics were not. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 64
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnosis Performances and Impact on Therapeutic Strategy of (18) F-Choline-PET/CT in Biochemical Relapse after I125 Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Blais, E.
    Karahissarlian, V.
    Sargos, P.
    Cazeau, A. L.
    Piechaud, T.
    Thomas, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E215 - E215
  • [42] The impact of 18F-Choline (FCH) PET/MRI on PSA response in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa)
    Evangelista, L.
    Cassarino, G.
    Lacognata, C.
    Da Pozzo, S.
    Cecchin, D.
    Zucchetta, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (SUPPL 1) : S172 - S172
  • [43] Predictive factors of 18F-choline PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy: is the impact of PSA nadir underestimated?
    Alison C. Johnson
    Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué
    Marlon Silva
    Laura Moise
    Xavier Tillou
    Florence Joly
    Nicolas Aide
    EJNMMI Research, 6
  • [44] Predictive factors of 18F-choline PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy: is the impact of PSA nadir underestimated?
    Johnson, Alison C.
    Dugue, Audrey Emmanuelle
    Silva, Marlon
    Moise, Laura
    Tillou, Xavier
    Joly, Florence
    Aide, Nicolas
    EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2016, 6
  • [45] EVALUATION OF THE PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF 18F-CHOLINE PET/CT IN PATIENTS WITH SKELETAL RECURRENCE PROSTATE CANCER
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Evangelista, Laura
    Agostini, Emanuela
    Cattaneo, Francesco
    Guttilla, Andrea
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E1035 - E1035
  • [46] Diagnostic value of retrospectively fused 64CuCl2 PET/MRI in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: comparison with fused 18F-Choline PET/MRI, 64CuCl2 PET/CT, 18F-Choline PET/CT, and mpMRI
    Paparo, Francesco
    Peirano, Alice
    Matos, Joao
    Bacigalupo, Lorenzo
    Rossi, Umberto
    Mussetto, Ilaria
    Bottoni, Gianluca
    Ugolini, Martina
    Introini, Carlo
    Ruggieri, Filippo Grillo
    Rollandi, Gian Andrea
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (11) : 3896 - 3906
  • [47] Evaluation of the prognostic impact of 18F-Choline PET/CT in patients with skeletal recurrence prostate cancer
    Evangelista, Laura
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Agostini, Emanuela
    Guttilla, Andrea
    Saladini, Giorgio
    Filiberto, Zattoni
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57
  • [48] Intense 18F-Choline Uptake After Minor Head Injury Misleading PET/CT Result in a Patient With Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Adenocarcinoma
    Leyendecker, Pierre
    Imperiale, Alessio
    Matern, Jean-Francois
    Noel, Georges
    Namer, Izzie-Jacques
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 39 (11) : 1012 - 1013
  • [49] Evaluating the impact of 18F-Choline PET/CT on prostate cancer management: Our retrospective study
    Cardona Arbonies, J.
    Mucientes Rasilla, J.
    Prieto Soriano, A.
    Zapata Paz, I.
    Martinez Ballesteros, C.
    Rodriguez Alfonso, B.
    Mitjavila Casanovas, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S541 - S541
  • [50] Diagnostic value of retrospectively fused 64CuCl2 PET/MRI in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer: comparison with fused 18F-Choline PET/MRI, 64CuCl2 PET/CT, 18F-Choline PET/CT, and mpMRI
    Francesco Paparo
    Alice Peirano
    João Matos
    Lorenzo Bacigalupo
    Umberto Rossi
    Ilaria Mussetto
    Gianluca Bottoni
    Martina Ugolini
    Carlo Introini
    Filippo Grillo Ruggieri
    Gian Andrea Rollandi
    Arnoldo Piccardo
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 3896 - 3906