Evaluation of BD MAX Staph SR Assay for Differentiating Between Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Determining Methicillin Resistance Directly From Positive Blood Cultures

被引:14
|
作者
Lee, Jaewoong [1 ]
Park, Yeon-Joon [1 ]
Park, Dong-Jin [1 ]
Park, Kang-Gyun [1 ]
Lee, Hae Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, 222 Banpodaero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Uijeongbu St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Lab Med, Uijongbu, South Korea
关键词
BD MAX; Staph SR; MRSA; Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus; Ct value; Methicillin; MREJ; IDENTIFICATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.39
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluated the performance of the BD MAX StaphSR Assay (SR assay; BD, USA) for direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistance not only in S. aureus but also in coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) from positive blood cultures. Methods: From 228 blood culture bottles, 103 S. aureus [45 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 55 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), 3 mixed infections (1 MRSA+Enterococcus faecalis, 1 MSSA+MRCNS, 1 MSSA+MSCNS)], and 125 CNS (102 MRCNS, 23 MSCNS) were identified by Vitek 2. For further analysis, we obtained the cycle threshold (Ct) values from the BD MAX system software to determine an appropriate cutoff value. For discrepancy analysis, conventional mecA/mecC PCR and oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined. Results: Compared to Vitek 2, the SR assay identified all 103 S. aureus isolates correctly but failed to detect methicillin resistance in three MRSA isolates. All 55 MSSA isolates were correctly identified by the SR assay. In the concordant cases, the highest Ct values for nuc, mecA, and mec right-extremity junction (MREJ) were 25.6, 22, and 22.2, respectively. Therefore, we selected Ct values from 0-27 as a range of positivity, and applying this cutoff, the sensitivity/specificity of the SR assay were 100%/100% for detecting S. aureus, and 97.9%/98.1% and 99.0%/95.8% for detecting methicillin resistance in S. aureus and CNS, respectively. Conclusions: We propose a Ct cutoff value for nuc/mec assay without considering MREJ because mixed cultures of MSSA and MRCNS were very rare (0.4%) in the positive blood cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antimicrobial resistance and virulence characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from imported beef meat
    Kamelia Osman
    Avelino Alvarez-Ordóñez
    Lorena Ruiz
    Jihan Badr
    Fatma ElHofy
    Khalid S. Al-Maary
    Ihab M. I. Moussa
    Ashgan M. Hessain
    Ahmed Orabi
    Alaa Saad
    Mohamed Elhadidy
    Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 16
  • [32] Novel Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Chlorhexidine-Quaternary Ammonium, Mupirocin, and Methicillin Resistance Genes, with Simultaneous Discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
    McClure, Jo-Ann
    DeLongchamp, Johanna Zaal
    Conly, John M.
    Zhang, Kunyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (06) : 1857 - 1864
  • [33] Can procalcitonin differentiate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci in clustered gram-positive bacteremia?
    Shomali, William
    Hachem, Ray
    Chaftari, Anne-Marie
    Bahu, Ramez
    El Helou, Gilbert
    Jiang, Ying
    Hanania, Alex
    Reitzel, Ruth
    Raad, Issam
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2013, 76 (02) : 158 - 161
  • [34] Clinical impact of a PCR assay for identification of Staphylococcus aureus and determination of methicillin resistance directly from blood cultures
    Hallin, M
    Maes, N
    Byl, B
    Jacobs, F
    De Gheldre, Y
    Struelens, MJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (08) : 3942 - 3944
  • [35] Activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in methicillin resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates from paediatric blood cultures
    Fajardo Olivares, Miguel
    Hidalgo Orozco, Rocio
    Rodriguez Garrido, Saray
    Gaona Alvarez, Cristina
    Sanchez Silos, Rosa Maria
    Hernandez Rastrollo, Ramon
    Martinez Tallo, Emilia
    Cordero Carrasco, Juan Luis
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2012, 25 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [36] Characterization of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci Isolates from blood cultures in a Brazilian University Hospital
    Pereira, Valeria Cataneli
    Ribeiro de Souza da Cunha, Maria de Lourdes
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGAINST MICROBIAL PATHOGENS: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 298 - 302
  • [37] Comparison of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Blood Cultures as a True Bacteremia Agent and Contaminant in Terms of Slime Production and Methicillin Resistance
    Uyanik, Muhammet Hamidullah
    Yazgi, Halil
    Ozden, Kemalettin
    Erdil, Zeynep
    Ayyildiz, Ahmet
    EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (02): : 115 - 119
  • [38] STUDY OF METHICILLIN RESISTANCE IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND SPECIES OF COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI ISOLATED FROM VARIOUS CLINICAL SPECIMENS
    Mehdinejad, Manijeh
    Sheikh, Ahmad Farajzadeh
    Jolodar, Abbas
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 24 (05) : 719 - 724
  • [39] Prevalence of antiseptic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from ATM machine in Hong Kong
    Zhang, M.
    Boost, M.
    O'Donoghue, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 14 : S28 - S28
  • [40] Ceftaroline in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococci: a short report from Italy
    Segatore, Bernardetta
    Setacci, Domenico
    Marcoccia, Francesca
    Amicosante, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 29 (02) : 118 - 121